sru: manual verification on azure of gh-529, 539, 494#159
Conversation
| sleep 30 | ||
| retry_ssh_command $IP "cloud-init status --wait --long" 5 | ||
| ssh "${SSHOPTS[@]}" $IP -- cloud-init status --wait --long | ||
| echo "--- TEST: EXPECT NO KVP dump logs in cloud-init.log" #bbsw |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Modifications to typical azure-sru script to validate cloud-int canonical/cloud-init#529
| echo "REBOOTING TO Confirm boot extra timeout across reboot LP: #1830740" #bbsw | ||
| ssh "${SSHOPTS[@]}" $IP -- sudo reboot || true | ||
| ssh "${SSHOPTS[@]}" $IP -- cloud-init status --wait --long | ||
| echo "--- TEST: BEGIN EXPECT Long boot time LP: #1830740" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Modifications to typical azure-sru script to validate canonical/cloud-init#539
| sleep 60 | ||
| ssh "${SSHOPTS[@]}" $IP -- cloud-init status --wait --long | ||
| ssh "${SSHOPTS[@]}" $IP -- sudo cat /run/cloud-init/result.json | ||
| echo "--- TEST: BEGIN EXPECT to find KVP dump logs in cloud-init.log" #bbsw |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| sleep 60 | ||
| retry_ssh_command $IP "cloud-init status --wait --long" 5 | ||
| echo 'After reboot' | ||
| echo "--- TEST: BEGIN EXPECT no delayed boot time LP: #1830740" #bbsw |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| diff -urN previous-network.out upgrade-network.out | ||
| echo '------- TEST: END Expect driver directives in diff previous-network to post-upgrade-network expect ------' | ||
|
|
||
| echo '--- TEST: Expect success count of 2 for temporary_hostname' #bbsw |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| } | ||
| } | ||
| --- TEST: BEGIN EXPECT to find KVP dump logs in cloud-init.log | ||
| 2020-09-09 16:26:50,291 - azure.py[DEBUG]: Dumping cloud-init.log file to KVP |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
found kvp upload logs
| detail: | ||
| DataSourceAzure [seed=/var/lib/waagent] | ||
| --- TEST: BEGIN EXPECT Long boot time LP: #1830740 | ||
| Startup finished in 6.058s (kernel) + 11.818s (userspace) = 17.877s |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's that value expected ? It seems way smaller than the other releases
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lucasmoura good eyes. And yes I should have qualified the test message to mention xenial is unaffected (because we only render fallback network config on Xenial (dhcp on eth0) instead of networking from IMDS. So, it shouldn't affect this release unless someone has custom images with apply_network_config: true.
2 participants
Validate: