chore: create PR description from changeset

[vicb]

Fill out the PR description (when empty) from changesets

---

• Tests
  • Tests included/updated
  • Automated tests not possible - manual testing has been completed as follows:
  • Additional testing not necessary because:
• Public documentation
  • Cloudflare docs PR(s):
  • Documentation not necessary because: DX

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory, but encouraged)

---

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9093dd5

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[pkg-pr-new]

create-cloudflare

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/create-cloudflare@12407

@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler@12407

miniflare

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/miniflare@12407

@cloudflare/pages-shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/pages-shared@12407

@cloudflare/unenv-preset

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/unenv-preset@12407

@cloudflare/vite-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/vite-plugin@12407

@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers@12407

@cloudflare/workers-editor-shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/workers-editor-shared@12407

@cloudflare/workers-utils

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/workers-utils@12407

wrangler

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/wrangler@12407

commit: 9093dd5

[petebacondarwin]

While I am not against this PR, I don't think it is very valuable. I worry we are just churning more CI runners with little benefit.

• If creating the PR manually, copying the changeset content to the PR description is pretty trivial.
• If I get an agent to generate the PR it is very capable of filling the description.

Moreover the PR description is fundamentally different to a changeset since it should also convey additional information about the implementation and things the review should be aware of.

[devin-ai-integration]

Devin Review found 1 potential issue.

View issue and 4 additional flags in Devin Review.

[vicb]

While I am not against this PR, I don't think it is very valuable. I worry we are just churning more CI runners with little benefit.

I don't like churn in the code especially in "critical" areas. I don't think it matters as much for Ci workflow.

• If creating the PR manually, copying the changeset content to the PR description is pretty trivial.

It is but not awlays done. I created the PR after this. It is not the first time I saw that. If I open a PR and there is no description, I usually don't bother getting farther.

• If I get an agent to generate the PR it is very capable of filling the description.

I don't think we need a (resource intensive) agent for such a simple thing?

Moreover the PR description is fundamentally different to a changeset since it should also convey additional information about the implementation and things the review should be aware of.

Agreed with that however I think changesets are reasonable in a lot of the simple cases

That being said I am not against closing this PR if it is deemed unvaluable.

[petebacondarwin]

I created the PR after #12384. It is not the first time I saw that. If I open a PR and there is no description, I usually don't bother getting farther.

I think you can feel free to ignore and not review PRs that are missing important information like a description.

I would like to close this PR as in general I have not heard anyone else hitting this issue and the extra complexity it requires in the PR template and parsing logic is not worth the benefit.