CC-5462: Simplify containers images list output

[gpanders]

Fixes CC-5462.

Use a simple table (one row for each entry) instead of a fancy table with box characters (that is hard to read and breaks when text wraps). Print one row for each name:tag combination.

---

• Tests
  • TODO (before merge)
  • Tests included
  • Tests not necessary because:
• Wrangler / Vite E2E Tests CI Job required? (Use "e2e" label or ask maintainer to run separately)
  • I don't know
  • Required
  • Not required because: UI only change
• Public documentation
  • TODO (before merge)
  • Cloudflare docs PR(s):
  • Documentation not necessary because: UI only change
• Wrangler V3 Backport
  • TODO (before merge)
  • Wrangler PR:
  • Not necessary because: the cloudchamber images feature does not exist in v3

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 2c7b227

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages

Name	Type
wrangler	Patch
@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[pkg-pr-new]

create-cloudflare

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/create-cloudflare@9620

@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler@9620

miniflare

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/miniflare@9620

@cloudflare/pages-shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/pages-shared@9620

@cloudflare/unenv-preset

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/unenv-preset@9620

@cloudflare/vite-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/vite-plugin@9620

@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers@9620

@cloudflare/workers-editor-shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/workers-editor-shared@9620

wrangler

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/wrangler@9620

commit: 2c7b227

[vicb]

Is this equivalent to:

Suggested change

	widths[i] = rows.map((r) => r[i].length).reduce((a, b) => Math.max(a, b), headers[i].length);
	widths[i] = Math.max(headers[i].length, ...rows.map((r) => r[i].length));

[gpanders]

Almost, but using the spread operator can fail or return incorrect results if the array is too large (according to the MDN reference). reduce doesn’t have that problem.

It’s unlikely that this array will ever be so large that that’s an issue in practice, but given that the array is technically unbounded in size I went with the safer option.

[CarmenPopoviciu]

LGTM