Add Notary Project docs assessment#27
Conversation
celestehorgan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nate - This is a great start! In general I think you need to think about:
- What the purpose of producing a document like this is: because we are limited resource in the CNCF ecosystem, we need to spread our resources carefully, and provide feedback that people can action on who aren't us. As such, when writing documentation like this, understand that the purpose of the document is to give enough information to the project maintainers that they can action without us - and anything we decide to help them with is a bonus!
- Who the intended user of the document is: Much of what you've written are in the form of (what amount to) notes to yourself, but aren't directly useful to someone who isn't you, because you haven't provided enough context for someone else to action on.
I'm concerned that perhaps the original documentation in the template was not robust enough, so let's talking during our 1:1 today about how we can improve that going forward.
4cac2c1 to
31387de
Compare
|
I'm not yet convinced of the Information Architecture suggestions here. I do think that it will need to be a work in progress with the maintainers, especially as the development is ongoing. |
Signed-off-by: Nate W <4453979+nate-double-u@users.noreply.github.com>
297ddc6 to
d09bf05
Compare
celestehorgan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mostly grammar and lexical issues this time; hopefully easy to resolve!
| | Criteria | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | | ||
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ||
| | Information architecture | | ✅ | | | | | ||
| | New user content | ✅ | | | | | | ||
| | Content maintainability | ✅ | | | | | | ||
| | Content creation processes | ✅ | | | | | | ||
|
|
||
| Criteria: | ||
| - 1 = (Is not present or requires significant work) | ||
| - 3 = (is present, but needs work) | ||
| - 5 = (is executed extremely well or no improvement required) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like the change you made to these tables, btw. Far more readable. Could you upstream this to the template? 😍
Signed-off-by: Nate W <4453979+nate-double-u@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Celeste Horgan <celeste@cncf.io>
Signed-off-by: Nate W <4453979+nate-double-u@users.noreply.github.com>
celestehorgan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM!
Please wait on @kapunahelewong to give her final okay before merging, @nate-double-u!
kapunahelewong
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Minor suggestions. Otherwise, LGTM!
Signed-off-by: Nate W <4453979+nate-double-u@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kapunahele Wong <kapunahelewong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nate W <4453979+nate-double-u@users.noreply.github.com>
Notary Project docs assessment
Deploy preview: https://github.com/cncf/techdocs/blob/26-notary-docs-assessment/assessments/0002-notary-project.md
Closes #26
Contributes to #32