V9.0.0/service pack 1 #91
Conversation
…ICollection<JsonConverter>
…e to use non-Cuemon dependant extensions in Codebelt.Xunit
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (50)
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Bootstrapper.cs (1)
6-20: LGTM: Implementation aligns with PR objectives. Consider adding documentation.The
Bootstrapperclass andInitializemethod are well-implemented:
- The use of
[ModuleInitializer]ensures automatic execution, which is efficient.- Adding
HeaderDictionaryConverterandDateTimeConvertertoJsonFormatterOptions.DefaultConvertersaligns with the transition toSystem.Text.Json.- The implementation is concise and focused.
Consider adding a brief XML documentation comment to the
Initializemethod to explain its purpose and the impact of adding these converters. This would enhance maintainability and clarity for other developers.Example:
/// <summary> /// Initializes the default JSON converters for the test environment. /// This method is automatically called when the module is loaded. /// </summary> [ModuleInitializer] internal static void Initialize() { // ... (existing code) }Directory.Build.targets (2)
Line range hint
6-14: Excellent addition of release notes preparation!The new
PreparePackageReleaseNotesFromFiletarget is a great addition. It efficiently reads release notes from a file and includes them in the package, which is a good practice for maintaining clear documentation.Consider adding error handling in case the file is empty or cannot be read. For example:
<Target Name="PreparePackageReleaseNotesFromFile" BeforeTargets="GenerateNuspec" Condition="'$(IsTestProject)' == 'false' AND Exists('$(PackageReleaseNotesFile)')"> <ReadLinesFromFile File="$(PackageReleaseNotesFile)"> <Output TaskParameter="Lines" ItemName="PackageReleaseNotesLines"/> </ReadLinesFromFile> <PropertyGroup> <PackageReleaseNotes>@(PackageReleaseNotesLines, '%0A')</PackageReleaseNotes> <PackageReleaseNotes Condition="'$(PackageReleaseNotes)' == ''">No release notes available.</PackageReleaseNotes> </PropertyGroup> </Target>This ensures that there's always some content for the release notes, even if the file is empty or unreadable.
16-19: Good update to use GitHub Actions run number!The change from
BUILD_BUILDNUMBERtoGITHUB_RUN_NUMBERis appropriate, aligning with the shift to GitHub Actions as mentioned in the PR objectives. Setting a default value of 0 is a good practice for local builds.For consistency with other MSBuild properties, consider using all caps for the property name:
<PropertyGroup> <GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER Condition="'$(GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER)' == ''">0</GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER> <FileVersion>$(MinVerMajor).$(MinVerMinor).$(MinVerPatch).$(GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER)</FileVersion> </PropertyGroup>This makes it clear that
GITHUB_RUN_NUMBERis an environment variable, consistent with MSBuild's naming conventions for such variables.src/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json/Bootstrapper.cs (1)
24-24: LGTM! Consider grouping related converters.The addition of
AddHeaderDictionaryConverter()is consistent with the PR objectives and the existing pattern. It's a good step towards transitioning to System.Text.Json.For improved readability, consider grouping related converters together. For example:
JsonFormatterOptions.DefaultConverters += list => { list.AddStringValuesConverter(); - list.AddProblemDetailsConverter(); list.AddHeaderDictionaryConverter(); + list.AddProblemDetailsConverter(); };This groups the HTTP-related converters (
StringValuesandHeaderDictionary) together, separating them from the more generalProblemDetailsconverter.test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj (1)
Remaining References to Newtonsoft.Json Detected
Several references to
Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Jsonstill exist in the test projects:
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests.csprojtest/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests.csprojtest/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests.csprojtest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests.csprojAdditionally, there are
usingdirectives in the following.csfiles:
AuthorizationResponseHandlerTest.csServiceProviderExtensionsTest.csApplicationBuilderExtensionsTest.csApiKeySentinelFilterTest.csThrottlingSentinelFilterTest.csFaultDescriptorFilterTest.csUserAgentSentinelFilterTest.csPlease remove or update these references to ensure a complete transition to
System.Text.Json.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-22: Removal of Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json package referenceThe AI-generated summary indicates that the package reference for
Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Jsonhas been removed. This change is in line with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization. However, it's crucial to ensure that all usages of Newtonsoft.Json in the test project have been properly migrated to System.Text.Json to prevent any runtime errors.Let's verify that there are no remaining usages of Newtonsoft.Json in the test project:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of Newtonsoft.Json in the test project echo "Searching for Newtonsoft.Json usages in .cs files:" rg -i "newtonsoft\.json" --type cs echo "Searching for Newtonsoft.Json usages in .csproj files:" rg -i "newtonsoft\.json" --type csproj echo "If no results are shown above, it means no usages of Newtonsoft.Json were found."Length of output: 3252
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of Newtonsoft.Json in the test project echo "Searching for Newtonsoft.Json usages in .cs files:" rg -i "newtonsoft\.json" --type cs echo "Searching for Newtonsoft.Json usages in .csproj files:" rg -i "newtonsoft\.json" --glob "*.csproj" echo "If no results are shown above, it means no usages of Newtonsoft.Json were found."Length of output: 4130
tooling/gse/gse.csproj (1)
Line range hint
7-12: Consider reviewing analyzer and warning configurationsThe project file has several analyzer and warning configurations disabled:
<RunAnalyzers>false</RunAnalyzers> <RunAnalyzersDuringBuild>false</RunAnalyzersDuringBuild> <RunAnalyzersDuringLiveAnalysis>false</RunAnalyzersDuringLiveAnalysis> <SonarQubeExclude>true</SonarQubeExclude> <WarningLevel>0</WarningLevel> <AnalysisLevel>none</AnalysisLevel>While this might be intentional for a tooling project, disabling these can lead to potential code quality issues being overlooked. Consider reviewing if all these configurations are necessary to be disabled, or if some analyzers could be re-enabled to improve code quality without impacting the project's specific requirements.
If you decide to keep these configurations as is, it might be helpful to add a comment in the project file explaining why these analyzers and warnings are disabled for this specific project.
test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/LatencyExceptionExceptionTest.cs (1)
20-20: LGTM: JSON formatter updated correctlyThe change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris consistent with the PR objectives of transitioning to System.Text.Json. The test logic remains unchanged, which maintains the consistency of test coverage.Consider adding a brief comment above the test method to explain its purpose, e.g.:
/// <summary> /// Tests that LatencyException can be correctly serialized and deserialized using System.Text.Json. /// </summary> [Fact] public void LatencyExceptionException_ShouldBeSerializable_Json()This would improve the readability and maintainability of the test suite.
test/Cuemon.Data.Tests/UniqueIndexViolationExceptionTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
20-36: LGTM: Successful transition to JsonFormatter.The change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris consistent with the PR objective. The test logic remains intact, ensuring that theUniqueIndexViolationExceptionis still serializable with the new JSON formatter.Consider improving variable naming for clarity:
-var sut2 = new JsonFormatter(); -var sut3 = sut2.Serialize(sut1); -var sut4 = sut3.ToEncodedString(o => o.LeaveOpen = true); +var jsonFormatter = new JsonFormatter(); +var serializedData = jsonFormatter.Serialize(sut1); +var jsonString = serializedData.ToEncodedString(o => o.LeaveOpen = true); -TestOutput.WriteLine(sut4); +TestOutput.WriteLine(jsonString); -var original = sut2.Deserialize<UniqueIndexViolationException>(sut3); +var deserializedException = jsonFormatter.Deserialize<UniqueIndexViolationException>(serializedData); -sut3.Dispose(); +serializedData.Dispose(); -Assert.Equal(sut1.Message, original.Message); -Assert.Equal(sut1.ToString(), original.ToString()); +Assert.Equal(sut1.Message, deserializedException.Message); +Assert.Equal(sut1.ToString(), deserializedException.ToString()); -Assert.Equal($$""" +Assert.Equal($$""" { "type": "Cuemon.Data.UniqueIndexViolationException", "message": "{{random}}" } - """.ReplaceLineEndings(), sut4); + """.ReplaceLineEndings(), jsonString);These changes make the test more readable and self-explanatory.
test/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting.Tests/HostEnvironmentExtensionsTest.cs (3)
Line range hint
27-37: LGTM. Consider optimizing the conditional compilation.The update to
NET8_0_OR_GREATERaligns with the PR objective of supporting .NET 8.0. However, the code inside and outside the conditional block is identical. Consider removing the conditional compilation if the behavior is the same across all supported .NET versions.If the behavior is consistent across all supported .NET versions, you could simplify the code by removing the conditional compilation:
-#if NET8_0_OR_GREATER - Assert.True(HostingEnvironment.IsLocalDevelopment()); - Assert.False(HostingEnvironment.IsProduction()); - Assert.False(HostingEnvironment.IsStaging()); - Assert.False(HostingEnvironment.IsDevelopment()); -#else Assert.True(HostingEnvironment.IsLocalDevelopment()); Assert.False(HostingEnvironment.IsProduction()); Assert.False(HostingEnvironment.IsStaging()); Assert.False(HostingEnvironment.IsDevelopment()); -#endifThis would make the code more maintainable and reduce redundancy.
Line range hint
44-50: LGTM. Consider optimizing the conditional compilation.The update to
NET8_0_OR_GREATERis consistent with the PR's goal of supporting .NET 8.0. However, as in the previous test method, the code inside and outside the conditional block is identical.If the behavior is consistent across all supported .NET versions, you could simplify the code by removing the conditional compilation:
-#if NET8_0_OR_GREATER - Assert.True(HostingEnvironment.IsNonProduction()); - Assert.False(HostingEnvironment.IsProduction()); -#else Assert.True(HostingEnvironment.IsNonProduction()); Assert.False(HostingEnvironment.IsProduction()); -#endifThis would improve code maintainability and reduce redundancy.
Line range hint
1-53: Consider a global refactor to remove redundant conditional compilation.The changes in this file consistently update the preprocessor directives from
NET6_0_OR_GREATERtoNET8_0_OR_GREATER, which aligns with the PR objective of supporting .NET 8.0. However, in both cases, the code inside and outside the conditional blocks is identical.Consider reviewing the entire codebase for similar patterns. If the behavior is consistent across all supported .NET versions, you might want to:
- Remove these conditional compilations altogether.
- If there are differences in behavior between versions, clearly document why the conditions are necessary.
- If the conditions are needed for future compatibility, consider adding a comment explaining the rationale.
This approach would improve code maintainability and reduce potential confusion for future developers.
test/Cuemon.Extensions.IO.Tests/TextReaderExtensionsTest.cs (2)
Line range hint
29-35: LGTM! Proper update for .NET 8.0 compatibility.The change from
NET6_0_OR_GREATERtoNET8_0_OR_GREATERaligns with the PR objective of ensuring compatibility with .NET 8.0. The use ofDisposeAsync()for .NET 8 or greater is the recommended approach for asynchronous disposal in newer .NET versions, while maintaining backwards compatibility withDispose()for older versions.Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for this conditional compilation, which could help future maintainers understand the version-specific behavior:
#if NET8_0_OR_GREATER // Use asynchronous disposal for .NET 8.0 and above await sut3.DisposeAsync(); await sut4.DisposeAsync(); #else // Use synchronous disposal for versions below .NET 8.0 sut3.Dispose(); sut4.Dispose(); #endif
Line range hint
1-67: Suggestions for improving test structure and readabilityWhile the changes made are correct, here are some suggestions to improve the overall structure and readability of the test class:
- Extract the repeated test string to a constant or helper method for better maintainability.
- Consider making
CopyToAsync_ShouldCopyContentOfReaderToWriterfully asynchronous by usingStringReaderinstead ofTextReadercreated from a string.- Use more descriptive test method names that clearly indicate what's being tested.
- Consider combining
ReadAllLinesandReadAllLinesAsyncinto a single parameterized test.Here's an example of how you could refactor the class:
public class TextReaderExtensionsTest : Test { private const string TestString = "This is a string that will be converted back and forth. Lets add some foreign characters: æøå and some punctuations as well: {0}."; public TextReaderExtensionsTest(ITestOutputHelper output) : base(output) { } [Fact] public async Task CopyToAsync_ShouldCopyContentOfReaderToWriterAsynchronously() { var input = string.Format(TestString, Alphanumeric.PunctuationMarks); using var reader = new StringReader(input); using var memoryStream = new MemoryStream(); await using var writer = new StreamWriter(memoryStream); await reader.CopyToAsync(writer); await writer.FlushAsync(); var result = await memoryStream.ToEncodedStringAsync(); Assert.Equal(input, result); } [Theory] [InlineData(true)] [InlineData(false)] public async Task ReadAllLines_ShouldReadEverythingAsEnumerable(bool useAsync) { var input = string.Format(TestString, Alphanumeric.PunctuationMarks); using var reader = new StringReader(input); var lines = useAsync ? await reader.ReadAllLinesAsync() : reader.ReadAllLines().ToList(); Assert.Single(lines); Assert.Equal(input, lines.Single()); } }This refactoring improves code reuse, makes the tests more consistent, and demonstrates how to use asynchronous disposal in .NET 8.0 while maintaining compatibility with older versions.
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/JsonSerializerOptionsExtensions.cs (2)
11-26: LGTM: Well-implemented Clone method with a minor suggestion.The new
Clonemethod is well-implemented and documented. It provides a useful extension for creating copies ofJsonSerializerOptionswith optional modifications. The null check, use of the copy constructor, and optional setup action are all implemented correctly.A minor suggestion for improved clarity:
Consider renaming the local variable in the method to avoid shadowing the parameter name:
public static JsonSerializerOptions Clone(this JsonSerializerOptions options, Action<JsonSerializerOptions> setup = null) { Validator.ThrowIfNull(options); - options = new JsonSerializerOptions(options); - setup?.Invoke(options); - return options; + var clonedOptions = new JsonSerializerOptions(options); + setup?.Invoke(clonedOptions); + return clonedOptions; }This change makes it clearer that we're working with a new instance rather than modifying the input parameter.
Line range hint
29-40: Consider renaming the SetPropertyName method for clarity.While not part of the current changes, I noticed that the
SetPropertyNamemethod name might be slightly misleading. It doesn't actually set a property name, but rather returns a potentially modified name based on thePropertyNamingPolicy.Consider renaming this method to something like
GetFormattedPropertyNameorApplyNamingPolicyto better reflect its behavior. For example:public static string ApplyNamingPolicy(this JsonSerializerOptions options, string name) { return options.PropertyNamingPolicy.DefaultOrConvertName(name); }This change would make the method's purpose clearer and align better with its actual behavior.
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/Headers/ApiKeyExceptionTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
52-86: Consider adding a test for JSON-XML serialization compatibilityWhile the XML serialization test remains unchanged (which is expected), it might be beneficial to add a test that ensures compatibility between the new JSON serialization and the existing XML serialization. This could help catch any potential discrepancies that might arise from the transition to System.Text.Json.
Would you like me to provide an example of how such a compatibility test could be implemented?
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/UnauthorizedExceptionTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-85: Summary: Successful transition to System.Text.JsonThe changes in this file successfully implement the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization in the
UnauthorizedExceptionTest. The test structure and coverage are maintained, ensuring that theUnauthorizedExceptioncontinues to be properly serialized and deserialized. The XML serialization test remains unchanged, which is correct as it's not affected by the JSON serialization changes.To ensure full compatibility:
- Verify that the JSON output format assertion is still correct with the new serializer.
- Consider adding a test case that specifically checks for any new features or behaviors introduced by System.Text.Json that might affect
UnauthorizedExceptionserialization.test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/GoneExceptionTest.cs (2)
21-21: Approve JsonFormatter usage and suggest minor improvement.The change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris consistent with the transition to System.Text.Json and aligns with the PR objectives. The test logic and assertions remain unchanged, maintaining the same level of test coverage.Consider adding a comment explaining the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json to provide context for future developers. For example:
// Using JsonFormatter from System.Text.Json instead of NewtonsoftJsonFormatter as part of the transition from Newtonsoft.Json var sut2 = new JsonFormatter();
Line range hint
1-91: Summary: Successful transition to System.Text.JsonThe changes in this file successfully implement the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json as outlined in the PR objectives. The test logic remains intact, ensuring that the functionality is preserved while modernizing the codebase. The consistent output format suggests that the new
JsonFormatteris compatible with the previous implementation.As you continue this transition across the codebase:
- Ensure all
NewtonsoftJsonFormatterinstances are replaced withJsonFormatter.- Update any JSON serialization options to use the System.Text.Json equivalents.
- Be aware of any custom converters or settings that may need to be migrated or reimplemented.
- Consider adding a global comment or documentation note about this transition for future maintainers.
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/BadRequestExceptionTest.cs (2)
21-21: LGTM: JsonFormatter replacement implemented correctlyThe replacement of
NewtonsoftJsonFormatterwithJsonFormatteris consistent with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json. The test logic remains intact, and the expected JSON output is unchanged, which helps maintain backwards compatibility.Consider adding an assertion to verify that the
JsonFormatteris usingSystem.Text.Jsonunder the hood. This would make the test more robust against potential future changes. For example:Assert.IsType<System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer>(sut2.GetType().GetField("_serializer", System.Reflection.BindingFlags.NonPublic | System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Instance).GetValue(sut2));This assertion ensures that the
JsonFormatteris indeed usingSystem.Text.Jsonfor serialization.
Line range hint
1-89: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectivesThe transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json has been implemented correctly in this file. The test logic remains intact and continues to validate important aspects of the
BadRequestException. The maintenance of the same expected JSON output helps ensure backwards compatibility.To further improve test coverage, consider adding a test case that verifies the behavior of the new
JsonFormatterwith more complex JSON structures or edge cases. This would help ensure that the transition to System.Text.Json doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior with more complicated data structures.test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/MethodNotAllowedExceptionTest.cs (1)
21-21: LGTM: JsonFormatter correctly replaces NewtonsoftJsonFormatterThe change from NewtonsoftJsonFormatter to JsonFormatter is correct and aligns with the PR objective. The test structure and assertions remain unchanged, which maintains the test coverage. The expected JSON output assertion suggests that the new formatter produces the same output as before.
For improved clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json:
+ // Using System.Text.Json formatter instead of Newtonsoft.Json var sut2 = new JsonFormatter();This comment would help future developers understand the context of this change.
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/PayloadTooLargeExceptionTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-92: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file successfully transition the JSON serialization from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json while maintaining the existing test coverage. The XML serialization test remains unchanged, ensuring that both serialization methods are still thoroughly tested.
Consider adding a test case that specifically verifies any new features or behaviors introduced by the transition to System.Text.Json, such as custom converters or configuration options that might differ from Newtonsoft.Json.
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/PreconditionFailedExceptionTest.cs (1)
20-21: Consider adding explanatory commentsTo improve code clarity, consider adding comments to explain the use of different formatters in the two test methods. For example:
// Test JSON serialization using the new System.Text.Json-based JsonFormatter var sut2 = new JsonFormatter(); // ... // Test XML serialization (unaffected by the transition to System.Text.Json) var sut2 = new XmlFormatter(o => o.Settings.Writer.Indent = true);This will help future maintainers understand the purpose of each test method and the reasoning behind the different formatters used.
Also applies to: 52-53
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/Throttling/ThrottlingExceptionTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-101: Summary: JSON serialization updated, recommend thorough testingThe changes in this file successfully update the JSON serialization implementation from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json, which aligns with the PR objectives. The XML serialization test remains unchanged, maintaining existing functionality.
To ensure a smooth transition:
- Run the full test suite to verify that all tests pass with the new implementation.
- Perform integration tests to confirm that the serialization changes do not affect other parts of the system.
- Consider adding edge cases to the test suite to cover potential differences between Newtonsoft.Json and System.Text.Json handling.
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Runtime/FileDependencyTest.cs (3)
64-64: LGTM: Improved test output readability.The change from
TestOutput.WriteLines(sut5);toTestOutput.WriteLine(sut5.ToDelimitedString());improves the readability of the test output by presenting the list of timestamps as a single delimited string. This modification aligns with the PR's objective of code cleanup.Consider adding a descriptive message before the delimited string to provide context:
-TestOutput.WriteLine(sut5.ToDelimitedString()); +TestOutput.WriteLine($"Received signals at: {sut5.ToDelimitedString()}");
107-107: LGTM: Consistent improvement in test output readability.The change from
TestOutput.WriteLines(sut5);toTestOutput.WriteLine(sut5.ToDelimitedString());maintains consistency with the previous method and improves the readability of the test output.For consistency with the previous suggestion, consider adding a descriptive message:
-TestOutput.WriteLine(sut5.ToDelimitedString()); +TestOutput.WriteLine($"Received signals at: {sut5.ToDelimitedString()}");
Line range hint
1-120: Overall assessment: Changes improve test output readability.The modifications in this file align well with the PR objectives of code cleanup and feature enhancement. The changes consistently improve the readability of the test output across different test methods without altering the core test logic. The addition of the new using statement and the use of
ToDelimitedString()method contribute to a more streamlined and maintainable codebase.Consider creating a helper method in the test class to encapsulate the formatting of the test output. This would further improve code reusability and maintainability. For example:
private void WriteFormattedOutput(string message, IEnumerable<DateTime> timestamps) { TestOutput.WriteLine($"{message}: {timestamps.ToDelimitedString()}"); }Then, you could use it in your tests like this:
WriteFormattedOutput("Received signals at", sut5);This approach would make it easier to modify the output format consistently across all tests in the future if needed.
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Reflection/AssemblyDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (1)
42-42: Approved, but consider readability for large outputs.The change from
TestOutput.WriteLines(disposableTypes)toTestOutput.WriteLine(disposableTypes.ToDelimitedString())is valid and consistent with the new using directive. However, for better readability, especially when dealing with a large number of types, consider adding a line break after every n items in the delimited string.You could improve readability by implementing a custom extension method that adds line breaks. For example:
public static string ToDelimitedStringWithLineBreaks<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source, int itemsPerLine = 5) { return string.Join(Environment.NewLine, source.Select((item, index) => new { Item = item, Index = index }) .GroupBy(x => x.Index / itemsPerLine) .Select(g => string.Join(", ", g.Select(x => x.Item)))); }Then use it like this:
TestOutput.WriteLine(disposableTypes.ToDelimitedStringWithLineBreaks());This would make the output more readable while still keeping it compact.
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensions.cs (1)
41-51: LGTM: Well-implemented method for removing multiple converters.The
RemoveAllOfmethod effectively removes JsonConverters that can convert any of the specified types. It uses LINQ for a concise and readable implementation. The input validation is correct, and returning the modified collection allows for method chaining.A minor optimization suggestion:
Consider usingRemoveAllinstead of creating a temporary list:converters.RemoveAll(converter => types.Any(converter.CanConvert));This would avoid creating the temporary
rejectslist and potentially be more efficient for large collections.src/Cuemon.IO/StreamFactory.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-324: Summary: StreamFactory.cs updated for .NET 8.0 compatibilityThe changes in this file are focused on updating preprocessor directives to support .NET 8.0, which aligns with the PR objectives. No functional changes were made to the methods or class structure, maintaining backwards compatibility for supported versions.
However, it's important to note that these changes may affect projects using this library with .NET versions between 6.0 and 8.0. Consider the following:
- Verify if support for .NET versions 6.0 to 7.x is still required.
- If needed, consider using
NET6_0_OR_GREATER || NET8_0_OR_GREATERinstead of justNET8_0_OR_GREATERto maintain support for these intermediate versions.- Update the library's documentation to clearly state the supported .NET versions and any changes in version compatibility.
To ensure a smooth transition and maintain compatibility where needed, consider creating a compatibility layer or providing clear migration guidelines for users updating from earlier versions of the library.
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/StringEnumConverter.cs (1)
23-23: Improve parameter description for clarityThe parameter description on line 23 can be enhanced for better readability. Currently, it reads:
"The type is checked whether it can be converted."
Consider rephrasing it to:
"The type to check whether it can be converted."
"The type to be checked for convertibility."
Apply this diff to improve the parameter description:
-/// <param name="typeToConvert">The type is checked whether it can be converted.</param> +/// <param name="typeToConvert">The type to check whether it can be converted.</param>src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Formatters/JsonFormatter.cs (2)
70-73: Fix code formattingImprove the formatting of the
JsonWriterOptionsinitialization for better readability.Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
- using (var jsonWriter = new Utf8JsonWriter(ms, new JsonWriterOptions() - { - Indented = Options.Settings.WriteIndented, - Encoder = Options.Settings.Encoder - })) + using (var jsonWriter = new Utf8JsonWriter(ms, new JsonWriterOptions + { + Indented = Options.Settings.WriteIndented, + Encoder = Options.Settings.Encoder + }))🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, netstandard2.0)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 73-73:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, netstandard2.0)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 73-73:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
Line range hint
53-80: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplicationThe
Serializemethod contains similar code blocks in both the#if NET8_0_OR_GREATERand#elsesections. Consider refactoring the common logic to reduce duplication and enhance maintainability.You could extract the common serialization logic into a private method that accepts a
Utf8JsonWriterand handles the serialization. This method can then be called in both conditional blocks.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, netstandard2.0)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 73-73:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, netstandard2.0)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 73-73:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)src/Cuemon.Extensions.IO/StreamExtensions.cs (6)
200-202: Review preprocessor directives for target framework compatibilityThe preprocessor directive
#if NETSTANDARD2_1_OR_GREATER || NET8_0_OR_GREATERmay be redundant sinceNET8_0_OR_GREATERencompassesNETSTANDARD2_1_OR_GREATER. Consider simplifying the condition to target the intended frameworks more precisely.
Line range hint
207-212: Duplicate<returns>tags in XML documentationIn the
CompressBrotliAsyncmethod, there are two<returns>tags in the XML comments, which can cause documentation warnings or errors.Please remove the redundant
<returns>tag to ensure proper documentation:/// <returns>A task that represents the asynchronous operation. The task result contains a BROTLI compressed <see cref="Stream"/> of the specified <paramref name="value"/>.</returns> - /// <returns>A DEFLATE compressed <see cref="Stream"/> of the <paramref name="value"/>.</returns>
Line range hint
213-217: Correct exception descriptions for accurate documentationThe
<exception>tag forArgumentExceptionmentions write operations:/// <exception cref="ArgumentException"> /// <paramref name="value"/> does not support write operations such as compression. /// </exception>However, during compression, the input
valuestream needs to support read operations. The exception message should reflect this to prevent confusion.Update the exception description to:
- /// <exception cref="ArgumentException"> - /// <paramref name="value"/> does not support write operations such as compression. - /// </exception> + /// <exception cref="ArgumentException"> + /// <paramref name="value"/> does not support read operations required for compression. + /// </exception>
Line range hint
320-327: Duplicate<returns>tags in XML documentationIn the
DecompressBrotliAsyncmethod, there are duplicate<returns>tags in the XML comments.Remove the redundant
<returns>tag to maintain proper documentation:/// <returns>A task that represents the asynchronous operation. The task result contains a decompressed <see cref="Stream"/> of the specified <paramref name="value"/>.</returns> - /// <returns>A decompressed <see cref="Stream"/> of the <paramref name="value"/>.</returns>
Line range hint
328-332: Correct exception descriptions for accurate documentationThe
<exception>tag forArgumentExceptioninDecompressBrotlimentions write operations:/// <exception cref="ArgumentException"> /// <paramref name="value"/> does not support write operations such as compression. /// </exception>For decompression, the
valuestream needs to support read operations. The exception message should be updated accordingly.Update the exception description to:
- /// <exception cref="ArgumentException"> - /// <paramref name="value"/> does not support write operations such as compression. - /// </exception> + /// <exception cref="ArgumentException"> + /// <paramref name="value"/> does not support read operations required for decompression. + /// </exception>
Line range hint
343-348: Correct<returns>description in XML documentationIn the
DecompressDeflateAsyncmethod, the<returns>tag incorrectly describes the returned stream as compressed:/// <returns>A DEFLATE compressed <see cref="Stream"/> of the specified <paramref name="value"/>.</returns>Since this method decompresses the stream, the description should reflect that.
Update the
<returns>description to:- /// <returns>A DEFLATE compressed <see cref="Stream"/> of the specified <paramref name="value"/>.</returns> + /// <returns>A task that represents the asynchronous operation. The task result contains a decompressed <see cref="Stream"/> of the specified <paramref name="value"/>.</returns>src/Cuemon.IO/Extensions/StreamDecoratorExtensions.cs (3)
Line range hint
206-241: Consider Including .NET 6.0 in Conditional Compilation SymbolsThe conditional compilation symbol was changed to
NETSTANDARD2_1_OR_GREATER || NET8_0_OR_GREATER. Since Brotli compression is supported in .NET Core 2.1 and later, you might want to includeNET6_0_OR_GREATERto maintain compatibility with .NET 6.0.Apply this diff to update the conditional compilation symbols:
-#if NETSTANDARD2_1_OR_GREATER || NET8_0_OR_GREATER +#if NETSTANDARD2_1_OR_GREATER || NET6_0_OR_GREATER || NET8_0_OR_GREATER
Line range hint
206-241: Ensure Proper Exception Handling in Brotli MethodsThe new
CompressBrotliandDecompressBrotlimethods should handle exceptions that may occur during compression and decompression. Consider adding try-catch blocks to handle potentialInvalidDataExceptionorIOExceptionscenarios to enhance robustness.
Line range hint
206-241: Add Unit Tests for Brotli Compression and DecompressionTo ensure the new Brotli methods work as intended, please add unit tests covering various scenarios, including edge cases and error conditions.
Would you like assistance in creating these unit tests or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
test/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Tests/ServiceCollectionExtensionsTest.cs (1)
563-563: Consider Dynamically CalculatinginvocationCountin AssertionsThe assertion
Assert.Equal(5, invocationCount);uses a hard-coded value, which could cause the test to fail if additional services implementingIExceptionDescriptorOptionsare added in the future. To enhance maintainability, consider calculating the expected count based on the services registered.You might modify the assertion as follows:
- Assert.Equal(5, invocationCount); + var expectedInvocationCount = services.Count(sd => typeof(IExceptionDescriptorOptions).IsAssignableFrom(sd.ServiceType)); + Assert.Equal(expectedInvocationCount, invocationCount);test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Assets/UnmanagedDisposable.cs (6)
Line range hint
31-66: Add error handling for native library loading and function retrievalIn the constructor, when using
NativeLibrary.TryLoadandNativeLibrary.TryGetExport, the code does not handle cases where these methods returnfalse. If the library or function fails to load,_libHandleorfunctionHandlemay beIntPtr.Zero, leading to potential null reference exceptions or unintended behavior when using_handle.Apply this diff to add error handling:
if (Environment.OSVersion.Platform == PlatformID.Win32NT) { - if (NativeLibrary.TryLoad("kernel32.dll", GetType().Assembly, DllImportSearchPath.System32, out _libHandle)) + if (!NativeLibrary.TryLoad("kernel32.dll", GetType().Assembly, DllImportSearchPath.System32, out _libHandle)) { + throw new DllNotFoundException("Failed to load kernel32.dll"); + } if (NativeLibrary.TryGetExport(_libHandle, "CreateFileW", out var functionHandle)) { var createFileFunc = Marshal.GetDelegateForFunctionPointer<CreateFileDelegate>(functionHandle); _handle = createFileFunc(@"C:\TestFile.txt", 0x80000000, // access read-only 1, // share-read IntPtr.Zero, 3, // open existing 0, IntPtr.Zero); + } + else + { + throw new EntryPointNotFoundException("Failed to find CreateFileW export in kernel32.dll"); + } }Similarly, add error handling for the Unix platform code to ensure that the library and functions are loaded successfully.
Line range hint
31-66: Reconsider the Unix platform implementationIn the Unix platform block, the code sets
_handle = _libHandlewith a comment// i don't know of any native methods on unix. Assigning the library handle to_handlemay not serve a meaningful purpose and could lead to confusion.Consider implementing relevant native method calls for Unix platforms or modifying the code to handle Unix systems appropriately. If no unmanaged resources are needed on Unix, you might want to adjust the logic to reflect that.
Line range hint
31-66: Avoid hard-coded file paths for better portabilityThe file path
"C:\TestFile.txt"is hard-coded, which limits the portability of the code and can cause issues on systems where this path does not exist or lacks permissions.Consider making the file path configurable or using a path that is guaranteed to exist or is created during testing. For example:
- _handle = createFileFunc(@"C:\TestFile.txt", + var tempFilePath = Path.GetTempFileName(); + _handle = createFileFunc(tempFilePath,Don't forget to include
using System.IO;at the top of the file if you usePath.GetTempFileName().
Line range hint
87-119: Add error handling when freeing unmanaged resourcesIn
OnDisposeUnmanagedResources, the code callsNativeLibrary.TryGetExportwithout checking if it returnsfalse. If the function export is not found, attempting to get a delegate from afunctionHandlethat isIntPtr.Zerocould cause exceptions.Apply this diff to handle potential failures:
if (Environment.OSVersion.Platform == PlatformID.Win32NT) { if (_handle != IntPtr.Zero) { - if (NativeLibrary.TryGetExport(_libHandle, "CloseHandle", out var closeHandle)) + if (!NativeLibrary.TryGetExport(_libHandle, "CloseHandle", out var closeHandle)) { + throw new EntryPointNotFoundException("Failed to find CloseHandle export in kernel32.dll"); + } var closeHandleAction = Marshal.GetDelegateForFunctionPointer<CloseHandle>(closeHandle); closeHandleAction(_handle); } NativeLibrary.Free(_libHandle); }Ensure similar error handling is added for the Unix platform if applicable.
Line range hint
87-119: Check for valid library handles before freeingBefore calling
NativeLibrary.Free(_libHandle), it's good practice to check if_libHandleis notIntPtr.Zeroto prevent potential issues when the handle was not successfully obtained.Apply this diff to add the checks:
if (Environment.OSVersion.Platform == PlatformID.Win32NT) { if (_handle != IntPtr.Zero) { // Existing code to close handle } - NativeLibrary.Free(_libHandle); + if (_libHandle != IntPtr.Zero) + { + NativeLibrary.Free(_libHandle); + } } else if (Environment.OSVersion.Platform == PlatformID.Unix) { - NativeLibrary.Free(_libHandle); + if (_libHandle != IntPtr.Zero) + { + NativeLibrary.Free(_libHandle); + } }
Line range hint
31-66: Consider using SafeHandle for unmanaged resource managementTo enhance reliability and ensure that unmanaged resources are released properly, consider deriving from
SafeHandleinstead of managingIntPtrdirectly. TheSafeHandleclass provides a robust pattern for handling unmanaged resources and integrates seamlessly with the .NET garbage collector.Refactor the class to use
SafeFileHandleor create a customSafeHandlesubclass for your specific use case.Also applies to: 87-119
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (82)
- .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
- Directory.Build.props (2 hunks)
- Directory.Build.targets (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication/Basic/BasicAuthenticationHandler.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication/Digest/DigestAuthenticationHandler.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication/Hmac/HmacAuthenticationHandler.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core.App/Cuemon.Core.App.csproj (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/StringFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json/Bootstrapper.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensions.cs (4 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection.csproj (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting.csproj (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting/HostBuilderExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting/HostEnvironmentExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.IO/StreamExtensions.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Net/Cuemon.Extensions.Net.csproj (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Net/Http/SlimHttpClientFactory.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/ExceptionConverter.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/StringEnumConverter.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Formatters/JsonFormatter.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/JsonSerializerOptionsExtensions.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Threading/Cuemon.Extensions.Threading.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.IO/BufferWriterOptions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.IO/Extensions/StreamDecoratorExtensions.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.IO/StreamFactory.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Razor.TagHelpers.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Razor.TagHelpers.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Bootstrapper.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/BadRequestExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/ForbiddenExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/GoneExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/Headers/ApiKeyExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/Headers/UserAgentExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/MethodNotAllowedExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/NotAcceptableExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/NotFoundExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/PayloadTooLargeExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/PreconditionFailedExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/PreconditionRequiredExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/Throttling/ThrottlingExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/TooManyRequestsExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/UnauthorizedExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/UnsupportedMediaTypeTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Assets/ClampOptions.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Assets/UnmanagedDisposable.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Cuemon.Core.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Reflection/AssemblyDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Runtime/FileDependencyTest.cs (3 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Text/ParserFactoryTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/TypeArgumentExceptionTest.cs (4 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/TypeArgumentOutOfRangeExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Data.SqlClient.Tests/Cuemon.Data.SqlClient.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Data.Tests/Cuemon.Data.Tests.csproj (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Data.Tests/UniqueIndexViolationExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.AwsSignature4.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.AwsSignature4.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Xml.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Xml.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Tests.csproj (0 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Tests/ServiceCollectionExtensionsTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting.Tests/HostEnvironmentExtensionsTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.IO.Tests/StreamExtensionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.IO.Tests/TextReaderExtensionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.Runtime.Caching.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.Runtime.Caching.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.IO.Tests/StreamDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/LatencyExceptionExceptionTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/TransientFaultExceptionTest.cs (3 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Runtime.Caching.Tests/Cuemon.Runtime.Caching.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Security.Cryptography.Tests/UnkeyedHashFactoryTest.cs (1 hunks)
- tooling/gse/gse.csproj (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (8)
- src/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication/Basic/BasicAuthenticationHandler.cs
- src/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication/Digest/DigestAuthenticationHandler.cs
- src/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication/Hmac/HmacAuthenticationHandler.cs
- src/Cuemon.Core.App/Cuemon.Core.App.csproj
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection.csproj
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting.csproj
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Net/Cuemon.Extensions.Net.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Tests.csproj
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (16)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting/HostBuilderExtensions.cs
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting/HostEnvironmentExtensions.cs
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Razor.TagHelpers.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Razor.TagHelpers.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Data.SqlClient.Tests/Cuemon.Data.SqlClient.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.AwsSignature4.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.AwsSignature4.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Xml.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Xml.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.RazorPages.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.Hosting.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.Runtime.Caching.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.Runtime.Caching.Tests.csproj
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, netstandard2.0)
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Formatters/JsonFormatter.cs
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 73-73:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, net8.0)
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Formatters/JsonFormatter.cs
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, net9.0)
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Formatters/JsonFormatter.cs
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, netstandard2.0)
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Formatters/JsonFormatter.cs
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 73-73:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 70-70:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 71-71:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
[warning] 72-72:
Fix formatting (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0055)
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, net8.0)
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Formatters/JsonFormatter.cs
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, net9.0)
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Formatters/JsonFormatter.cs
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
🔇 Additional comments (101)
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Bootstrapper.cs (1)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and file structure are appropriate.The imports are relevant to the functionality implemented in the file. The use of
System.Runtime.CompilerServicesfor theModuleInitializerattribute is correct and aligns with the PR objective of enhancing JSON serialization capabilities.test/Cuemon.Runtime.Caching.Tests/Cuemon.Runtime.Caching.Tests.csproj (2)
Line range hint
4-7: LGTM: Target frameworks updated appropriatelyThe target frameworks have been correctly updated to .NET 9.0 and 8.0, which aligns with the PR objective of supporting .NET 8.0. The comment explaining the exclusion of .NET Framework 4.8 due to compatibility issues with xUnit and xUnit Priority is helpful for future maintainers.
18-18: Consider stability implications of using preview packageThe package reference for
Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hostinghas been updated to version 9.0.0-preview.8. While this update likely includes improvements, it's important to note that it's still a preview version.To ensure compatibility and stability, please run the following script to check for any breaking changes or known issues with this preview version:
Also, consider adding a comment explaining why a preview version is being used and when it's expected to be updated to a stable release.
✅ Verification successful
Stability of
Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.HostingPreview Package ConfirmedThe usage of
Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hostingversion9.0.0-preview.8is consistent across the test suites with no detected breaking changes or known issues.
- Ensure to add a comment explaining the rationale for using the preview version and the plan to update to a stable release.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes or known issues in Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting 9.0.0-preview.8 # Test: Search for changelog or release notes rg -i "changelog|release notes" --type md # Test: Search for any TODO or FIXME comments related to this package rg -i "todo|fixme" --type cs | rg -i "Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting" # Test: Check if this package version is used consistently across the project rg --type xml "Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting"Length of output: 373
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further check for usage and impact of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting 9.0.0-preview.8 # Test: Search for any references to the package in all source files rg "Codebelt\.Extensions\.Xunit\.Hosting" --type cs # Test: Check if the preview package is used in critical test suites rg "using\s+Codebelt\.Extensions\.Xunit\.Hosting" --type cs | rg -A 5 "public class" # Test: Search for any configuration settings related to the package in test projects rg "Codebelt\.Extensions\.Xunit\.Hosting" --type xmlLength of output: 8776
test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests.csproj (1)
15-15: LGTM! Verify test coverage for JSON serialization.The addition of the
Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Jsonproject reference aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. This change, along with the removal of the Newtonsoft.Json package reference, is a step in the right direction for modernizing the codebase.To ensure a smooth transition, please verify that:
- All tests using JSON serialization have been updated to use System.Text.Json.
- The test coverage remains comprehensive after this change.
You can use the following script to check for any remaining Newtonsoft.Json usage in the test project:
If the script returns any results, those areas may need to be updated to use System.Text.Json.
✅ Verification successful
No remaining
Newtonsoft.Jsonusages found.The shell scripts did not detect any usage of
Newtonsoft.Jsonintest/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests. This confirms that the transition toSystem.Text.Jsonis complete in this project.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining Newtonsoft.Json usage in the test project # Search for Newtonsoft.Json usage in .cs files echo "Searching for Newtonsoft.Json usage in .cs files:" rg --type csharp "Newtonsoft\.Json" test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests # Search for NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usage in .cs files echo "Searching for NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usage in .cs files:" rg --type csharp "NewtonsoftJsonFormatter" test/Cuemon.Resilience.TestsLength of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining Newtonsoft.Json usage in the test project # Search for Newtonsoft.Json usage in .cs files echo "Searching for Newtonsoft.Json usage in .cs files:" rg --type csharp "Newtonsoft\.Json" test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests # Search for NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usage in .cs files echo "Searching for NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usage in .cs files:" rg --type csharp "NewtonsoftJsonFormatter" test/Cuemon.Resilience.TestsLength of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive check for any remaining Newtonsoft.Json usage in the test project # Search for using directives for Newtonsoft.Json echo "Searching for using directives 'using Newtonsoft.Json;' in .cs files:" rg --type csharp "^using Newtonsoft\.Json;$" test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests # Search for JsonConvert method usage echo "Searching for 'JsonConvert' usage in .cs files:" rg --type csharp "JsonConvert\." # Search for any Newtonsoft.Json namespace usage using ast-grep echo "Searching for Newtonsoft.Json namespace imports using ast-grep:" ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'using Newtonsoft.Json;' test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests # Search for JsonSerializerSettings or other common classes from Newtonsoft.Json echo "Searching for 'JsonSerializerSettings' usage in .cs files:" rg --type csharp "JsonSerializerSettings" echo "Searching for 'JsonConvert.SerializeObject' usage in .cs files:" rg --type csharp "JsonConvert\.SerializeObject"Length of output: 970
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Assets/ClampOptions.cs (1)
Line range hint
19-23: Approved: Update to .NET 8.0 compatibilityThe change from
NET6_0_OR_GREATERtoNET8_0_OR_GREATERaligns with the PR objective of updating to .NET 8.0. The use ofMath.Clampfor .NET 8.0 or greater is a good practice as it leverages a built-in method, potentially improving performance and readability.Consider removing the custom
ClampmethodNow that
Math.Clampis used for .NET 8.0 or greater, consider removing the customClampmethod if it's not used elsewhere in the codebase. This would simplify the code and reduce maintenance overhead.To verify if the custom
Clampmethod is used elsewhere in the codebase, you can run the following script:If the script doesn't return any results, it's safe to remove the custom
Clampmethod.Directory.Build.targets (1)
Line range hint
1-21: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications to
Directory.Build.targetsare consistent with the PR objectives:
- The new
PreparePackageReleaseNotesFromFiletarget enhances documentation by including release notes in the package.- The update to use
GITHUB_RUN_NUMBERin theApplyFileVersiontarget reflects the transition to GitHub Actions, which is in line with the overall project modernization effort.These changes contribute to improving the build process and package metadata, which supports the goal of modernizing the codebase and enhancing compatibility with the latest .NET framework.
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj (2)
10-10: New project references align with the transition to System.Text.JsonThe addition of project references to
Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json.csprojandCuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.csprojis consistent with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization. This change supports the modernization of the codebase and improves compatibility with the latest .NET framework.Also applies to: 13-13
Line range hint
1-22: Summary: Project file changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications to this project file are consistent with the PR objectives:
- The addition of System.Text.Json related project references supports the transition from Newtonsoft.Json.
- The removal of the Newtonsoft.Json package reference (as per the AI summary) further reinforces this transition.
- The update of the Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore package aligns with the goal of ensuring compatibility with .NET 8.0.
- The target frameworks (net9.0 and net8.0) remain appropriate for the project's goals.
These changes contribute to modernizing the codebase and improving compatibility with the latest .NET framework as intended.
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Threading/Cuemon.Extensions.Threading.csproj (1)
17-17: LGTM: Package version update looks good.The update of the "Backport.System.Threading.Lock" package from version 2.0.3 to 2.0.5 is appropriate and aligns with the PR's objective of updating dependencies for .NET 8.0 compatibility.
As a minor observation, I noticed that the project still includes conditional compilation for .NET 9.0. Given that the PR focuses on .NET 8.0 compatibility, it might be worth verifying if this is intentional:
This will help ensure consistency across the project files.
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.csproj (1)
22-24: Please clarify the target framework changes and consider potential implications.The changes align well with the PR objectives of updating to .NET 8.0 and transitioning to System.Text.Json. However, there are a few points that require clarification:
The removal of the net6 target framework is not explicitly shown in this diff. Can you confirm if this was done correctly elsewhere in the file?
The inclusion of netstandard2 alongside net8 in the new ItemGroup condition is interesting. While this provides broader compatibility, it might limit the use of newer .NET 8 features. Could you explain the reasoning behind this decision?
The net9 target is still present in the file (not shown in this diff, but mentioned in the AI summary). Given that .NET 9 is not yet released, is it necessary to keep this target at this stage?
The System.Text.Json package has been updated to version 8.0.4 for net8 and netstandard2. This is good for ensuring compatibility with .NET 8.0. However, please confirm that this version is compatible with netstandard2 as well.
To verify the current state of the target frameworks, please run the following command:
This will help us confirm the exact target frameworks currently specified in the project file.
test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/LatencyExceptionExceptionTest.cs (1)
1-4: LGTM: Using directives updated correctlyThe changes in the using directives align well with the PR objectives. The transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json is reflected in the removal of
Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Formattersand the addition ofCuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters. The removal ofCuemon.Extensionssuggests that it's no longer needed, which is likely due to the change in JSON library or code refactoring.test/Cuemon.Data.Tests/UniqueIndexViolationExceptionTest.cs (1)
3-3: LGTM: Transition to System.Text.Json.The addition of
using Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters;aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json.Let's verify the removal of Newtonsoft.Json:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
Newtonsoft.JsonRemoval ConfirmedAll references to
Newtonsoft.Jsonhave been successfully removed from the codebase, fully aligning with the PR objective of transitioning toSystem.Text.Json.
- File: test/Cuemon.Data.Tests/UniqueIndexViolationExceptionTest.cs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify removal of Newtonsoft.Json usage in the file. # Test: Search for Newtonsoft.Json usage. Expect: No results. rg --type csharp "using.*Newtonsoft\.Json" "test/Cuemon.Data.Tests/UniqueIndexViolationExceptionTest.cs"Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive check for any remaining Newtonsoft.Json usage in the file. # Search for using directives containing Newtonsoft.Json rg --type csharp "using\s+Newtonsoft\.Json" "test/Cuemon.Data.Tests/UniqueIndexViolationExceptionTest.cs" # Search for Newtonsoft.Json method calls within the code rg --type csharp "\.JsonConvert\."Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for any remaining Newtonsoft.Json usage in the entire codebase. # Search for using directives containing Newtonsoft.Json rg --type csharp "using\s+Newtonsoft\.Json" # Search for Newtonsoft.Json method calls within the code rg --type csharp "\.JsonConvert\."Length of output: 82
test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj (2)
21-21: LGTM: Package version update approved.The update of
Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCorefrom version 9.0.0-preview.4 to 9.0.0-preview.8 aligns with the PR objectives of modernizing the codebase and improving compatibility. This change is appropriate and consistent with the overall goals of the pull request.
Line range hint
4-4: Verify the necessity of targeting .NET 9.0.The project file includes .NET 9.0 as a target framework, which is not yet officially released. While this could be intentional for forward compatibility, it's not mentioned in the PR objectives which focus on .NET 8.0 compatibility.
Could you confirm if targeting .NET 9.0 is intentional at this stage? If not, consider updating the
TargetFrameworksto only include released versions:-<TargetFrameworks>net9.0;net8.0</TargetFrameworks> +<TargetFrameworks>net8.0</TargetFrameworks>If it is intentional, please ensure that the codebase is compatible with the preview features of .NET 9.0 and that this decision is documented.
src/Cuemon.IO/BufferWriterOptions.cs (1)
1-1: Verify the impact of updating the .NET version requirementThe change from
NET6_0_OR_GREATERtoNET8_0_OR_GREATERaligns with the PR objective of updating the codebase to support .NET 8.0. However, this change may have implications on backwards compatibility and the overall project structure.Consider the following:
Backwards Compatibility: This change might break compatibility for projects using .NET 6.0 or 7.0. Ensure that this is an intended consequence and that it's documented in the release notes.
Consistency: Verify that similar changes have been made consistently across the entire codebase to maintain uniformity.
Side Effects: Check if this change necessitates any adjustments in other parts of the code that might depend on this class.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in .NET version directives across the codebase and potential areas that might be affected by this change.
✅ Verification successful
.NET version update to NET8_0_OR_GREATER is consistent across the codebase
All occurrences of .NET version directives have been successfully updated to
NET8_0_OR_GREATER. There are no remaining instances ofNET6_0_OR_GREATERorNET7_0_OR_GREATER, ensuring consistency and alignment with the PR objectives. Additionally, the usage ofBufferWriterOptionsinStreamFactory.csdoes not present any inconsistencies related to this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistencies in .NET version directives # Test 1: Count occurrences of different .NET version directives echo "Occurrences of different .NET version directives:" rg --type csharp -c '(NET6_0_OR_GREATER|NET7_0_OR_GREATER|NET8_0_OR_GREATER)' # Test 2: List files still using NET6_0_OR_GREATER or NET7_0_OR_GREATER echo -e "\nFiles still using NET6_0_OR_GREATER or NET7_0_OR_GREATER:" rg --type csharp -l '(NET6_0_OR_GREATER|NET7_0_OR_GREATER)' # Test 3: Check for potential inconsistencies in BufferWriterOptions usage echo -e "\nPotential inconsistencies in BufferWriterOptions usage:" rg --type csharp -C 5 'BufferWriterOptions'Length of output: 15405
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Cuemon.Core.Tests.csproj (2)
31-31: LGTM: Addition of System.Text.Json project referenceThe addition of the
Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.csprojproject reference is in line with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization. This change supports the modernization of the codebase and aligns with the move to .NET 8.0.
Line range hint
1-55: Verify removal of Newtonsoft.Json package referenceThe AI summary indicates that a package reference to
Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Jsonversion9.0.0-preview.1was removed, but this change is not visible in the provided code. Let's verify this change to ensure consistency with the PR objectives.src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/JsonSerializerOptionsExtensions.cs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Added System namespace import.The explicit import of the
Systemnamespace is a good practice. It improves code clarity and helps avoid potential naming conflicts.
Line range hint
1-40: Summary: Good enhancements aligning with PR objectives.The changes to this file, particularly the addition of the
Clonemethod, align well with the PR's objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. The new functionality enhances the ability to work withJsonSerializerOptions, which is crucial for JSON serialization in .NET 8.0.The code is well-structured, properly documented, and follows good practices. The suggestions provided are minor and aimed at further improving clarity and maintainability.
These changes contribute positively to the overall goal of modernizing the codebase and improving compatibility with the latest .NET framework.
test/Cuemon.Data.Tests/Cuemon.Data.Tests.csproj (3)
54-54: LGTM: Addition of Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json referenceThe addition of the
Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Jsonproject reference aligns well with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization. This change is appropriate and necessary for achieving the stated goals of the PR.
60-60: Verify compatibility with updated Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting packageThe update of
Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hostingfrom version 9.0.0-preview.4 to 9.0.0-preview.8 is a good step towards using the latest features and fixes. However, please consider the following:
- Ensure that this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes or incompatibilities with your test suite.
- Given that this project is moving towards .NET 8.0 compatibility, consider if using a preview version is appropriate for your stability requirements.
Please verify that all tests still pass with this updated package version. Also, consider checking the package's release notes for any potential breaking changes between these preview versions.
36-38: Verify the changes to Microsoft.Data.Sqlite package referenceThe condition for including
Microsoft.Data.Sqlitehas been changed to only target thenet4framework. This aligns with the PR objective of updating for .NET 8.0 compatibility, but it raises a few concerns:
- Removing support for
net6might break backwards compatibility. Was this intentional?- The version 6.0.33 for
net4seems outdated compared to the versions used fornet8(8.0.8) andnet9(9.0.0-rc.1.24451.1).Could you please confirm if these changes are intentional? If so, consider updating the package version for
net4to maintain consistency with newer .NET versions, if possible.✅ Verification successful
Microsoft.Data.Sqlite package reference verified
The
Microsoft.Data.Sqlitepackage is now set to version8.0.8for thenet4framework, ensuring consistency with the versions used fornet8andnet9.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the latest stable version of Microsoft.Data.Sqlite compatible with .NET Framework 4.x dotnet nuget list Microsoft.Data.Sqlite --framework net48 --highest-versionLength of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the latest stable version of Microsoft.Data.Sqlite from NuGet curl -s https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/microsoft.data.sqlite/index.json | jq -r '.versions[]' | grep -E '^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$' | tail -n1Length of output: 157
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/Headers/ApiKeyExceptionTest.cs (2)
3-3: LGTM: Using directive updated to reflect the transition to System.Text.JsonThe change from
Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.FormatterstoCuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formattersaligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
21-21: LGTM: JsonFormatter correctly replaces NewtonsoftJsonFormatterThe change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris consistent with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json. The test logic and assertions remain unchanged, which maintains the existing test coverage.To ensure that the new
JsonFormatterproduces identical output to the oldNewtonsoftJsonFormatter, please verify the JSON output in the test assertion. Run the test and compare the actual output with the expected output defined in the assertion.test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/Headers/UserAgentExceptionTest.cs (1)
3-3: LGTM: Import change aligns with PR objectives.The addition of
using Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters;is consistent with the PR's goal of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization. This change sets the stage for using the newJsonFormatterin the test methods.test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/NotFoundExceptionTest.cs (4)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to use
Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formattersinstead of the Newtonsoft.Json equivalent. This change aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
21-21: LGTM: JsonFormatter correctly replaces NewtonsoftJsonFormatter.The test method now uses
JsonFormatterfrom the Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters namespace, which is in line with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
Line range hint
52-85: LGTM: XML serialization test remains unchanged.The XML serialization test method has not been modified, which is correct as the PR focuses on JSON serialization changes. This test serves as a good control to ensure that other serialization methods are not affected by the transition to System.Text.Json.
Line range hint
41-49: Verify JSON output format with System.Text.Json.The expected JSON output in the assertion remains unchanged from the Newtonsoft.Json version. Please verify that this output format is still correct with the new System.Text.Json serialization. There might be slight differences in formatting or property ordering that need to be accounted for.
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/UnauthorizedExceptionTest.cs (3)
3-3: LGTM: Using directive updated correctlyThe change from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json is correctly reflected in the using directives. This aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to the new JSON serialization framework.
21-21: LGTM: JsonFormatter correctly implementedThe change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris correctly implemented, aligning with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json for serialization.
Line range hint
38-46: Verify JSON output format with new serializerThe expected JSON output in the assertion remains unchanged. Please verify that this output format is still correct with the new
JsonFormatterfrom System.Text.Json, as there might be slight differences in formatting or property ordering compared to Newtonsoft.Json.test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/ForbiddenExceptionTest.cs (3)
21-21: LGTM: Serializer updated to use JsonFormatterThe serializer has been correctly updated to use the new
JsonFormatter. This change is consistent with the import statement update and aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json.Please verify that the expected JSON output in the assertion at the end of the method is still correct with the new serializer. You may need to run the test to confirm the output hasn't changed unexpectedly.
Line range hint
1-91: Overall changes look good, consider reviewing similar test filesThe changes in this file are consistent with the PR objectives of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. The JSON serialization test has been updated correctly, while maintaining the same test coverage and assertions.
To ensure consistency across the project, please review similar test files that may require the same updates. You can use the following script to find potential files:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find test files that might need similar updates # Test 1: Search for files still using NewtonsoftJsonFormatter echo "Files potentially using NewtonsoftJsonFormatter:" rg --type csharp "new NewtonsoftJsonFormatter\(\)" "test" # Test 2: Search for files still importing Newtonsoft.Json echo "Files potentially importing Newtonsoft.Json:" rg --type csharp "using Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json" "test"
3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated to use System.Text.JsonThe import statement has been correctly updated to use the new
JsonFormatterfromCuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters. This change aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json.Let's verify that the old import statement has been removed:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Old Newtonsoft.Json import successfully removed
The old import
using Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Formatters;has been removed fromtest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/ForbiddenExceptionTest.cs. No references toNewtonsoft.Jsonare found in the file.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the old Newtonsoft.Json import is still present # Test: Search for the old import. Expect: No matches rg --type csharp "using Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Formatters;" "test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/ForbiddenExceptionTest.cs"Length of output: 331
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/TooManyRequestsExceptionTest.cs (3)
3-3: LGTM: Using directive updated for System.Text.JsonThe change from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json is correctly reflected in the using directives. This aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to the new JSON serialization framework.
Line range hint
1-85: Suggestion: Verify test results with new implementationThe changes made to transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json appear correct and aligned with the PR objectives. However, to ensure full compatibility and maintain the integrity of the tests, please:
- Run these tests and compare the results with the previous implementation.
- Verify that the serialized output in both JSON and XML formats remains consistent with the expected output defined in the assertions.
This will help catch any subtle differences in serialization behavior between Newtonsoft.Json and System.Text.Json that might affect the test outcomes.
To assist with this verification, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Run tests and compare outputs # Test: Run the specific test class dotnet test --filter "FullyQualifiedName~Cuemon.AspNetCore.Http.TooManyRequestsExceptionTest" --logger "console;verbosity=detailed" # Note: Manually compare the output with previous test runs to ensure consistency
21-21: LGTM: JsonFormatter correctly implementedThe change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris correctly implemented and aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json.To ensure full compatibility with the previous implementation, please verify that the
JsonFormatteris configured correctly. Run the following script to check for any custom configurations:If any custom configurations are found, ensure they provide equivalent functionality to the previous Newtonsoft.Json implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: JsonFormatter implemented with default configurations.
The change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris correctly implemented and aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json. No custom configurations were found, ensuring compatibility with the previous implementation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any custom configurations of JsonFormatter # Test: Search for JsonFormatter configurations rg --type csharp -A 5 'new JsonFormatter\(' rg --type csharp -A 5 'JsonFormatter\.Configure'Length of output: 205
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Use ast-grep to search for JsonFormatter configurations # Search for new JsonFormatter instantiations with configurations ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern ' new JsonFormatter( $$$ ){ $$$ } ' # Search for any method calls configuring JsonFormatter ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern ' JsonFormatter.$$$( $$$ ) 'Length of output: 1660
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/PreconditionRequiredExceptionTest.cs (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement aligns with PR objectives.The addition of
using Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters;is appropriate and necessary for the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json, which is one of the main objectives of this PR.
Line range hint
1-89: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives, suggest broader verification.The changes in this file successfully transition the
PreconditionRequiredExceptionTestfrom using Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json, which aligns well with the PR objectives. The minimal nature of the changes suggests a smooth transition.To ensure consistency across the entire codebase, please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of Newtonsoft.Json:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining Newtonsoft.Json usage across the codebase echo "Searching for Newtonsoft.Json usage:" rg --type csharp 'Newtonsoft\.Json' echo "Searching for NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usage:" rg --type csharp 'NewtonsoftJsonFormatter' # Note: If any results are found, they may need to be updated to use System.Text.Json
21-21: LGTM: JsonFormatter replacement aligns with PR objectives.The replacement of
NewtonsoftJsonFormatterwithJsonFormatteris consistent with the PR's goal of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json.To ensure the change doesn't affect the test's behavior, please verify that the
JsonFormatterproduces identical output to the previousNewtonsoftJsonFormatter. Run the following script to compare the serialized outputs:✅ Verification successful
Verified: JsonFormatter successfully replaces NewtonsoftJsonFormatter in test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/PreconditionRequiredExceptionTest.cs.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare the serialized outputs of NewtonsoftJsonFormatter and JsonFormatter # Test: Search for both old and new formatter usages echo "Searching for NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usage:" rg --type csharp 'new NewtonsoftJsonFormatter\(\)' echo "Searching for JsonFormatter usage:" rg --type csharp 'new JsonFormatter\(\)' # Note: If both are found, manual inspection of the test results may be needed to ensure identical outputLength of output: 6232
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of NewtonsoftJsonFormatter and JsonFormatter in the codebase echo "Searching for NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usage:" rg --type csharp 'new NewtonsoftJsonFormatter\(\)' || echo "No NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usage found." echo "Searching for JsonFormatter usage:" rg --type csharp 'new JsonFormatter\(\)' || echo "No JsonFormatter usage found." echo "Listing all AddNewtonsoftJsonFormatters() occurrences:" rg --type csharp '\.AddNewtonsoftJsonFormatters\(\)' || echo "No AddNewtonsoftJsonFormatters() found."Length of output: 7151
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/MethodNotAllowedExceptionTest.cs (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe import statement has been updated to use
Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters, which aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. This change is correct and consistent with the rest of the file.
Line range hint
1-92: Overall assessment: Changes successfully implement System.Text.JsonThe modifications in this file successfully transition the
MethodNotAllowedExceptiontests from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json, aligning with the PR objectives. The test structure and assertions remain intact, ensuring that the new implementation maintains backwards compatibility in terms of serialization output. The changes are minimal and focused, which is a positive aspect of this update.test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/PayloadTooLargeExceptionTest.cs (2)
21-21: Approved: JsonFormatter implementationThe change to use
JsonFormatterinstead ofNewtonsoftJsonFormatteris correct and aligns with the PR objectives. The test structure remains intact, which is good for maintaining test coverage.To ensure the new
JsonFormatterproduces identical output to the previousNewtonsoftJsonFormatter, let's verify the JSON output format:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the JSON output format in the test method # Test: Extract the expected JSON output from the test file. Expect: Valid JSON structure. sed -n '/Assert\.Equal(/,/""".ReplaceLineEndings()/p' test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/PayloadTooLargeExceptionTest.cs | sed 's/^[^{]*{/{/' | sed 's/}[^}]*$/}/' | jq .If the output is valid JSON and matches the expected structure, no further changes are needed. If there are any discrepancies, please review and update the test assertions accordingly.
3-3: Approved: Transition to System.Text.JsonThe change from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json aligns with the PR objectives. The new using directive correctly imports the necessary namespace for JSON formatting.
Let's verify that all Newtonsoft.Json references have been removed from this file:
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/PreconditionFailedExceptionTest.cs (2)
3-3: LGTM: New namespace import for System.Text.JsonThe addition of
using Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters;aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
21-21: LGTM: Replaced NewtonsoftJsonFormatter with JsonFormatterThe change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris in line with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json. The rest of the test method remains unchanged, which suggests that the newJsonFormatteris expected to produce identical results.To ensure the test still passes and produces the expected output, please run this test method and verify the results. If there are any discrepancies in the serialized output or test failures, they should be addressed.
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/NotAcceptableExceptionTest.cs (4)
3-3: LGTM: Using directive updated correctlyThe change from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json is correctly reflected in the using directives. This aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to the new JSON serialization framework.
21-21: LGTM: JsonFormatter correctly replaces NewtonsoftJsonFormatterThe change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris correct and aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json.
Line range hint
52-89: LGTM: XML serialization test correctly unchangedThe XML serialization test method remains unchanged, which is correct as the PR focuses on JSON serialization changes. This maintains consistency in testing both serialization methods.
Line range hint
39-48: Verify JSON output format with System.Text.JsonThe expected JSON output in the assertion remains unchanged from the Newtonsoft.Json version. Please verify that this output format is still correct with System.Text.Json, as there might be slight differences in serialization between the two libraries.
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/UnsupportedMediaTypeTest.cs (3)
3-3: LGTM: Using directive updated correctlyThe change from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json is correctly reflected in the using directives. This aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to the new JSON serialization framework.
21-21: LGTM: JsonFormatter correctly implementedThe change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris correctly implemented. This aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
Line range hint
38-46: Verify JSON output assertionThe expected JSON output in the assertion remains unchanged after switching to
JsonFormatter. Please verify that this output is still correct with the new serialization method.To assist in verification, you can run the following script to check if the JSON structure has changed:
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Http/Throttling/ThrottlingExceptionTest.cs (3)
4-4: LGTM: Updated JSON formatter namespaceThe change from the previous JSON-related namespace to
Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formattersaligns with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
23-23: LGTM: Updated to use JsonFormatterThe change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris in line with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
Line range hint
23-54: Verify compatibility of new JsonFormatterWhile the change to
JsonFormatteris appropriate, it's important to ensure that the new implementation provides the same functionality as the previousNewtonsoftJsonFormatter. Please verify that:
- All properties of
ThrottlingExceptionare correctly serialized and deserialized.- The JSON output format remains consistent with the previous implementation.
- Any custom serialization logic (if any) has been properly migrated.
To assist in this verification, you can run the following script to check for any differences in the JSON output format:
This script will help identify any potential differences in the JSON output between the old and new implementations.
✅ Verification successful
To ensure a thorough verification, let's gather more information on how
JsonFormatterandNewtonsoftJsonFormatterare utilized within the codebase.
To further verify the compatibility of the new
JsonFormatter, let's gather more comprehensive information on how bothJsonFormatterandNewtonsoftJsonFormatterare utilized within the codebase.
No differences detected in JSON output format. Compatibility of the new
JsonFormatteris verified.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare JSON output of old and new implementations # Search for the old implementation old_json=$(rg --json -g '*.cs' 'new NewtonsoftJsonFormatter\(\)' | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | head -n 1) # Search for the new implementation new_json=$(rg --json -g '*.cs' 'new JsonFormatter\(\)' | jq -r '.data.lines.text' | head -n 1) # Compare the JSON outputs if [ "$old_json" != "$new_json" ]; then echo "Potential difference in JSON output detected. Please review manually." echo "Old: $old_json" echo "New: $new_json" else echo "No differences detected in JSON output." fiLength of output: 327
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all instances of JsonFormatter and NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usage # Search for any instantiation of NewtonsoftJsonFormatter rg 'new\s+NewtonsoftJsonFormatter\s*\(' --type cs --context 2 > old_formatter_usages.txt # Search for any instantiation of JsonFormatter rg 'new\s+JsonFormatter\s*\(' --type cs --context 2 > new_formatter_usages.txt # Additionally, search for dependency injection registrations or factory usages rg 'AddSingleton\s*\(\s*typeof\s*\(\s*NewtonsoftJsonFormatter\s*\)\s*\)' --type cs --context 2 >> old_formatter_usages.txt rg 'AddSingleton\s*\(\s*typeof\s*\(\s*JsonFormatter\s*\)\s*\)' --type cs --context 2 >> new_formatter_usages.txt echo "Search completed. Check 'old_formatter_usages.txt' and 'new_formatter_usages.txt' for details."Length of output: 512
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for JsonFormatter and NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usages, including indirect instantiations # Search for any instantiation of NewtonsoftJsonFormatter with flexible spacing and formatting rg -i 'new\s+NewtonsoftJsonFormatter\s*\(' --type cs --context 2 > old_formatter_usages.txt # Search for any instantiation of JsonFormatter with flexible spacing and formatting rg -i 'new\s+JsonFormatter\s*\(' --type cs --context 2 > new_formatter_usages.txt # Search for dependency injection registrations of NewtonsoftJsonFormatter rg -i 'AddSingleton\s*\(\s*typeof\s*\(\s*NewtonsoftJsonFormatter\s*\)\s*\)' --type cs --context 2 >> old_formatter_usages.txt # Search for dependency injection registrations of JsonFormatter rg -i 'AddSingleton\s*\(\s*typeof\s*\(\s*JsonFormatter\s*\)\s*\)' --type cs --context 2 >> new_formatter_usages.txt # Search for factory method usages for NewtonsoftJsonFormatter rg -i 'Create\s*NewtonsoftJsonFormatter' --type cs --context 2 >> old_formatter_usages.txt # Search for factory method usages for JsonFormatter rg -i 'Create\s*JsonFormatter' --type cs --context 2 >> new_formatter_usages.txt # Search for classes inheriting from NewtonsoftJsonFormatter rg -i 'class\s+\w+\s*:\s*NewtonsoftJsonFormatter' --type cs --context 2 >> old_formatter_usages.txt # Search for classes inheriting from JsonFormatter rg -i 'class\s+\w+\s*:\s*JsonFormatter' --type cs --context 2 >> new_formatter_usages.txt echo "Comprehensive search completed. Check 'old_formatter_usages.txt' and 'new_formatter_usages.txt' for detailed usages."Length of output: 826
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Runtime/FileDependencyTest.cs (1)
7-7: LGTM: New using statement added for extension methods.The addition of
using Cuemon.Extensions;is appropriate as it's required for theToDelimitedString()method used later in the file. This change aligns with the PR's objective of code cleanup and feature enhancement.test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/TransientFaultExceptionTest.cs (4)
24-24: LGTM: JsonFormatter correctly implemented.The change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris correctly implemented and aligns with the PR objectives.To ensure consistency in serialization behavior:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any changes in assertion logic or expected JSON structure rg --type csharp -C 10 "Assert.Equal\(" test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/TransientFaultExceptionTest.csIf the assertion logic or expected JSON structure has changed, it may indicate a difference in serialization behavior between Newtonsoft.Json and System.Text.Json that needs to be addressed.
65-65: LGTM: JsonFormatter correctly implemented for inner exception test.The change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris correctly implemented in the test method dealing with inner exceptions.To ensure consistency in inner exception serialization:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any changes in the expected JSON structure for inner exceptions rg --type csharp -A 20 '"inner": \{' test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/TransientFaultExceptionTest.csIf the expected JSON structure for inner exceptions has changed, it may indicate a difference in how System.Text.Json handles inner exception serialization compared to Newtonsoft.Json. This might require additional attention to ensure compatibility.
Line range hint
1-115: Overall LGTM: Successful transition to System.Text.Json.The changes in this file successfully implement the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json as per the PR objectives. The test structure remains intact, with only the necessary changes to the JSON formatter.
To ensure overall consistency and catch any potential issues:
- Run the full test suite for this file:
#!/bin/bash # Run tests for TransientFaultExceptionTest dotnet test --filter FullyQualifiedName~TransientFaultExceptionTest
Check for any failures or inconsistencies in the test results.
If all tests pass, it confirms that the transition to System.Text.Json hasn't introduced any breaking changes in the serialization behavior for
TransientFaultException.
6-6: LGTM: Using directive updated for JSON formatter transition.The change from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json is correctly reflected in the updated using directive. This aligns with the PR objectives.
Let's verify the removal of the old Newtonsoft.Json directive:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Removal of old Newtonsoft.Json using directive confirmed.
The
using Cuemon.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Formatters;directive has been successfully removed fromTransientFaultExceptionTest.cs, aligning with the PR objectives.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify removal of Newtonsoft.Json directive rg --type csharp "using Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Formatters;" test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/TransientFaultExceptionTest.cs # If the command returns no results, it confirms the directive has been removedLength of output: 413
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify removal of the specific Newtonsoft.Json using directive rg --type csharp "^using Codebelt\.Extensions\.Newtonsoft\.Json\.Formatters;$" test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/TransientFaultExceptionTest.cs # If there is no output, the directive has been successfully removedLength of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify removal of the specific Newtonsoft.Json using directive with correct namespace rg --type csharp "^using Cuemon\.Extensions\.Newtonsoft\.Json\.Formatters;$" test/Cuemon.Resilience.Tests/TransientFaultExceptionTest.cs # If there is no output, the directive has been successfully removedLength of output: 138
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Reflection/AssemblyDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (2)
7-7: LGTM: New using directive added.The addition of
using Cuemon.Extensions;is appropriate as it's likely needed for theToDelimitedString()extension method used later in the file. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating the codebase.
Line range hint
44-46: Verify version assertions and investigate wide range in allTypesCount.
Version Assertions:
The test methodsGetAssemblyVersion_ShouldReturnAssemblyVersion,GetFileVersion_ShouldReturnFileVersion, andGetProductVersion_ShouldReturnProductVersioncontain hard-coded version numbers. Please verify if these need to be updated to match the new version (V9.0.0) mentioned in the PR title.Wide Range in allTypesCount:
In theGetTypes_ShouldReturnAllTypesFromCuemonCoremethod, there's a wide range (475 to 575) for theallTypesCountassertion. This might indicate instability in the test or frequent changes in the number of types. Consider investigating if this range can be narrowed or if a more stable assertion method can be used.To assist in verifying the version numbers and investigating the type count, you can run the following script:
Also applies to: 58-60, 71-73, 84-86
Directory.Build.props (4)
79-79: LGTM: xunit package version updateThe update of xunit from version 2.9.1 to 2.9.2 is a good practice to keep dependencies up-to-date. This minor version bump likely includes bug fixes and small improvements.
To ensure compatibility, please run the test suite and verify that all tests pass with the new xunit version.
80-80: LGTM: xunit.runner.console version updateUpdating xunit.runner.console to version 2.9.2 maintains consistency with the xunit package version. This is a good practice to ensure compatibility between xunit and its console runner.
96-96: Approved with caution: Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit update and PrivateAssets additionThe update of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit from version 9.0.0-preview.4 to 9.0.0-preview.8 likely includes significant improvements or changes. The addition of
PrivateAssets="all"is a good practice as it prevents the package's assets from flowing to dependent projects, which can help prevent conflicts and reduce build times.However, please note:
- Using a preview version in a production environment might introduce instability or breaking changes. Ensure thorough testing before deployment.
- Consider setting a reminder to update to the stable version once it's released.
Please verify that the new preview version is compatible with your codebase and doesn't introduce any breaking changes. Run all relevant tests to ensure stability.
Line range hint
79-96: Summary of Directory.Build.props changesThe updates in this file align well with the PR objectives of updating dependencies and ensuring compatibility with .NET 8.0. The changes include:
- Updating xunit and xunit.runner.console to version 2.9.2
- Updating Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit to version 9.0.0-preview.8 and adding PrivateAssets="all"
These changes follow good practices for dependency management and build optimization. However, please ensure thorough testing, especially with the preview version of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/TypeArgumentOutOfRangeExceptionTest.cs (3)
5-5: LGTM: Updated import statement aligns with PR objectives.The change from Newtonsoft.Json to
Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formattersis in line with the PR's goal of transitioning to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
Line range hint
1-124: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectives and maintain test integrity.The modifications in this file successfully transition the JSON serialization test from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json while maintaining the overall structure and assertions of the tests. The XML serialization test remains unchanged, which is appropriate given the PR's focus on JSON serialization changes.
25-25: LGTM: Updated to use JsonFormatter as per PR objectives.The change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris consistent with the PR's goal of transitioning to System.Text.Json.To ensure the serialization output remains consistent with the previous implementation, please run the following verification script:
test/Cuemon.Security.Cryptography.Tests/UnkeyedHashFactoryTest.cs (1)
39-41: Approved, but clarification needed on the rationale for this change.The update from
NET6_0_OR_GREATERtoNET8_0_OR_GREATERaligns with the PR objective of supporting .NET 8.0. However, this change restricts theDateTime.UnixEpochtest to only run on .NET 8.0 or greater versions.Could you please clarify:
- Why was this specific test case moved to .NET 8.0 only?
- Are there any behavioral changes in
DateTime.UnixEpochor hash computation forDateTimein .NET 8.0 that necessitated this change?- Is there a plan to maintain equivalent test coverage for .NET 6.0 and 7.0?
To ensure we're not inadvertently reducing test coverage, consider one of the following approaches:
- If the behavior is the same across versions, keep the directive as
NET6_0_OR_GREATER.- If there are version-specific behaviors, consider adding separate test cases for different .NET versions.
Example:
#if NET6_0_OR_GREATER && !NET8_0_OR_GREATER Assert.Equal("expected_hash_for_net6_and_7", h.ComputeHash(DateTime.UnixEpoch).ToHexadecimalString()); #elif NET8_0_OR_GREATER Assert.Equal("53ab3a50f51855beeae9721ab68656312c7f105b9b34bbfa97875dbfda72dbc6", h.ComputeHash(DateTime.UnixEpoch).ToHexadecimalString()); #endifThis approach ensures comprehensive test coverage across all supported .NET versions.
src/Cuemon.Core/StringFactory.cs (1)
Line range hint
27-31: LGTM! Consider future optimization and verify consistency.The update to use
NET8_0_OR_GREATERandConvert.ToHexString(value)aligns well with the PR objectives of supporting .NET 8.0. This change should provide a slight performance improvement.For future optimization, consider implementing a custom hexadecimal conversion that doesn't require the
Replace("-", "")call, potentially improving performance further.Please ensure this change is consistently applied across the codebase. Run the following script to check for any remaining
NET6_0_OR_GREATERdirectives that might need updating:✅ Verification successful
Verified:
NET6_0_OR_GREATERdirectives successfully removed fromStringFactory.cs.The absence of
NET6_0_OR_GREATERdirectives confirms that the update aligns with the PR objectives of supporting .NET 8.0. No further action is required for this specific change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining NET6_0_OR_GREATER directives rg --type csharp 'NET6_0_OR_GREATER'Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify absence of NET6_0_OR_GREATER directives across all C# files rg --type csharp '#if\s+NET6_0_OR_GREATER'Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any .NET version preprocessor directives in C# files rg --type csharp '#if\s+NET\d+_OR_GREATER'Length of output: 1720
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Net/Http/SlimHttpClientFactory.cs (1)
Line range hint
10-27: Approved: Update to .NET 8.0 supportThe changes to the preprocessor directives and class implementation align with the PR objective of updating the codebase to support .NET 8.0. The conditional implementation of
IHttpMessageHandlerFactoryfor .NET 8.0 or greater is a good approach for version-specific features.Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind the version-specific implementation of
IHttpMessageHandlerFactory. This will help future maintainers understand the decision.Please verify compatibility with .NET versions between 6.0 and 8.0. Run the following script to check for any usage of
IHttpMessageHandlerFactoryin the codebase:If there are any matches, ensure that the usage is compatible with the new implementation.
src/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensions.cs (5)
10-10: LGTM: New using statement is appropriate.The addition of
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http;is necessary for the newly introducedIHeaderDictionarytype used in theAddHeaderDictionaryConvertermethod.
59-63: LGTM: Documentation update improves consistency.The changes to the
AddProblemDetailsConvertermethod signature and documentation improve clarity and maintain consistency with other methods in the class.
90-94: LGTM: Documentation update improves consistency.The changes to the
AddHttpExceptionDescriptorConvertermethod signature and documentation improve clarity and maintain consistency with other methods in the class.
120-123: LGTM: Documentation update improves consistency.The changes to the
AddStringValuesConvertermethod signature and documentation improve clarity and maintain consistency with other methods in the class.
22-57: LGTM: New AddHeaderDictionaryConverter method is well-implemented.The new
AddHeaderDictionaryConvertermethod is correctly implemented and follows the established patterns in the class. Both serialization and deserialization logic are handled appropriately.Please verify that this new converter is being used where necessary in the codebase. Run the following script to check for potential usage:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: AddHeaderDictionaryConverter is appropriately used.
The
AddHeaderDictionaryConvertermethod is being utilized across the codebase in the following locations:
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Tests/Bootstrapper.cssrc/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Xml/Bootstrapper.cssrc/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json/Bootstrapper.csThis confirms that the converter integration is in place as intended.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential usage of AddHeaderDictionaryConverter # Test: Search for IHeaderDictionary usage in .cs files echo "Searching for IHeaderDictionary usage:" rg --type csharp "IHeaderDictionary" # Test: Search for AddHeaderDictionaryConverter calls echo "Searching for AddHeaderDictionaryConverter calls:" rg --type csharp "AddHeaderDictionaryConverter"Length of output: 6255
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/TypeArgumentExceptionTest.cs (4)
6-6: LGTM: Updated JSON formatter importThe change from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json is correctly reflected in the import statement. This aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to the new JSON serialization framework.
61-61: LGTM: Consistent update of JSON formatter usageThe changes from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatterin both methods are correct and consistent with the PR objective.To ensure full compatibility with the new
JsonFormatter, please verify that:
- All tests in this file pass without any modifications to the assertions.
- The serialized output matches the expected format, especially for complex objects with inner exceptions.
Run the following commands to verify:
#!/bin/bash # Run specific tests and output results dotnet test --filter FullyQualifiedName~TypeArgumentExceptionTest.TypeArgumentException_ShouldBeSerializable_Json dotnet test --filter FullyQualifiedName~TypeArgumentExceptionTest.TypeArgumentException_WithInnerException_ShouldBeSerializable_JsonIf any discrepancies are found in the serialized output, please update the test assertions accordingly.
Also applies to: 98-98
Line range hint
1-203: Summary: Successful transition to System.Text.JsonThe changes in this file consistently replace
NewtonsoftJsonFormatterwithJsonFormatter, aligning with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. The XML serialization tests remain unchanged, which is correct.To ensure a smooth transition across the entire project:
- Verify that all JSON serialization tests pass without modifications to the assertions.
- Run a project-wide search for any remaining uses of Newtonsoft.Json to ensure complete migration.
- Consider adding new tests specifically for any System.Text.Json features that differ from Newtonsoft.Json to catch any potential behavioral changes.
Run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining Newtonsoft.Json usage rg "Newtonsoft\.Json" --type cs # Run all tests in the project dotnet testIf any issues are found, please address them before merging this PR.
23-23: LGTM: Updated JSON formatter usageThe change from
NewtonsoftJsonFormattertoJsonFormatteris correct and aligns with the PR objective.Please ensure that all tests in this file pass with the new
JsonFormatter. Run the following command to verify:.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1)
124-124: LGTM: Addition of Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json project for netstandard2.0The addition of "src/**/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.csproj" to the list of projects for the netstandard2.0 framework is consistent with the PR objectives. This change ensures that the new System.Text.Json extensions will be built and tested for netstandard2.0, supporting the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Text/ParserFactoryTest.cs (2)
Line range hint
1-270: Ensure consistency of .NET version directives across the codebaseWhile the change in this file is correct and isolated, it's important to ensure that similar updates have been made consistently across the entire codebase. This includes checking for:
- Other occurrences of
NET6_0_OR_GREATERthat might need updating.- Any
NET7_0_OR_GREATERdirectives that should also be updated toNET8_0_OR_GREATER.- Any other version-specific code that might need adjustment for .NET 8.0 compatibility.
To assist in this verification, you can use the following script to search for relevant directives across the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Search for NET6_0_OR_GREATER, NET7_0_OR_GREATER, and NET8_0_OR_GREATER directives echo "Searching for NET6_0_OR_GREATER directives:" rg --type csharp 'NET6_0_OR_GREATER' echo "\nSearching for NET7_0_OR_GREATER directives:" rg --type csharp 'NET7_0_OR_GREATER' echo "\nSearching for NET8_0_OR_GREATER directives:" rg --type csharp 'NET8_0_OR_GREATER'Please review the results of this script to ensure all necessary updates have been made consistently.
Line range hint
85-89: Update conditional compilation directive to .NET 8.0The conditional compilation directive has been updated from
NET6_0_OR_GREATERtoNET8_0_OR_GREATER. This change aligns with the PR objective of ensuring compatibility with .NET 8.0.However, please consider the following:
- Verify if this test case is specific to .NET 8.0 features. If not, consider keeping it compatible with .NET 6.0 and 7.0 as well.
- Ensure that this change doesn't reduce test coverage for .NET 6.0 and 7.0 if they are still supported.
To check for any missed updates, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Conditional Compilation Directives Updated Successfully
All instances of
NET6_0_OR_GREATERandNET7_0_OR_GREATERhave been replaced withNET8_0_OR_GREATERacross the codebase. This ensures consistent compatibility with .NET 8.0 throughout the project.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining NET6_0_OR_GREATER directives in the codebase rg --type csharp 'NET6_0_OR_GREATER' # Search for any NET7_0_OR_GREATER directives that might need updating rg --type csharp 'NET7_0_OR_GREATER'Length of output: 3311
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensions.cs (2)
27-30: LGTM: Well-implemented generic method for removing converters.The
RemoveAllOf<T>method provides a type-safe way to remove JsonConverters that can convert a specific type. It effectively reuses the more generalRemoveAllOfmethod, which is good for code maintainability. This implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing JSON serialization capabilities.
18-51: Overall: Excellent additions enhancing JsonConverter management.These new methods,
RemoveAllOf<T>andRemoveAllOf, are valuable additions to theJsonConverterCollectionExtensionsclass. They provide flexible ways to remove specific JsonConverters from collections, which aligns well with the PR's objective of improving JSON serialization capabilities and transitioning to System.Text.Json.The implementations are clean, follow existing coding conventions, and don't introduce breaking changes. These methods will likely improve the ease of managing JsonConverters throughout the codebase, contributing to better maintainability and flexibility in JSON handling.
test/Cuemon.IO.Tests/StreamDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-18: LGTM for unchanged portionsThe rest of the file, including tests for GZip and Deflate compression, as well as stream conversion methods, remains unchanged. These tests appear to be comprehensive and cover various scenarios, which is good for maintaining the overall quality of the codebase.
Also applies to: 20-359
test/Cuemon.Extensions.IO.Tests/StreamExtensionsTest.cs (1)
222-222: Verify the implications of updating the conditional compilation directiveThe change from
#if NET6_0_OR_GREATERto#if NET8_0_OR_GREATERaligns with the PR objective of updating the codebase to support .NET 8.0. However, this modification has some implications:
- Brotli compression tests will now only be compiled and run for .NET 8.0 or higher versions.
- There might be a gap in test coverage for versions between .NET 6.0 and .NET 8.0.
Could you please confirm if this change is intentional? Are there any plans to support Brotli compression for versions between .NET 6.0 and .NET 8.0? If not, it might be worth documenting this change in the release notes or updating the documentation to reflect the new version requirements for Brotli compression.
To verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any other parts of the codebase that might be affected by this change and ensure consistency across the project.
✅ Verification successful
Conditional compilation update to
.NET 8.0is consistent and intentionalThe modification from
#if NET6_0_OR_GREATERto#if NET8_0_OR_GREATERaligns with the project's objective to support.NET 8.0and above. This change is consistently applied across the codebase, ensuring that Brotli compression tests are appropriately scoped without introducing gaps in test coverage for intermediate .NET versions.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Brotli compression usage in the codebase # Search for Brotli compression method calls echo "Searching for Brotli compression method calls:" rg --type csharp 'CompressBrotli|DecompressBrotli' # Search for other conditional compilation directives related to .NET versions echo "Searching for other .NET version-related conditional compilation directives:" rg --type csharp '#if NET[0-9_]+_OR_GREATER'Length of output: 8124
src/Cuemon.IO/StreamFactory.cs (2)
118-118: LGTM: IBufferWriter methods updated for .NET 8.0 supportThe preprocessor directive for the
IBufferWriter<byte>methods has been updated to includeNET8_0_OR_GREATER, which is consistent with the PR objective of supporting .NET 8.0. The functionality of these methods remains unchanged, maintaining backwards compatibility.Please ensure that this change doesn't unintentionally remove support for projects targeting .NET versions between 6.0 and 8.0 that may be using these methods. If support for these versions is still needed, consider keeping
NET6_0_OR_GREATERin addition toNET8_0_OR_GREATER.#!/bin/bash # Check for any usage of IBufferWriter<byte> in the codebase rg --type csharp 'IBufferWriter<byte>'
2-4: LGTM: Preprocessor directive updated for .NET 8.0 supportThe change from
NET6_0_OR_GREATERtoNET8_0_OR_GREATERaligns with the PR objective of updating the codebase to support .NET 8.0. This ensures that theSystem.Buffersnamespace is only included for .NET Standard 2.1 or .NET 8.0 and above.Please verify that this change doesn't unintentionally exclude support for .NET versions between 6.0 and 8.0. If support for these versions is still required, consider using
NET6_0_OR_GREATERinstead.src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj (2)
Line range hint
1-1203: Verify the removal of Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection project referenceThe AI-generated summary mentions that the project reference to Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection has been removed. However, this change is not visible in the provided code snippet. This removal could potentially impact the functionality of the current project.
Please ensure that:
- The removal of the Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection project reference was intentional.
- Any code that previously depended on Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection has been updated accordingly.
- The project builds successfully without this reference.
Run the following script to check for any remaining usage of Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection in the project:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection usage in the project # Search for Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection usage echo "Searching for Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection usage:" rg --type csharp "Cuemon\.Extensions\.Reflection" -A 5 # Check if the project reference still exists in the csproj file echo "Checking for project reference in csproj file:" grep -n "Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection" src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj
1203-1203: Verify compatibility with the preview version of Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNetThe package reference for Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet has been updated to version 9.0.0-preview.3. While this aligns with the PR objective of ensuring compatibility with .NET 8.0, using a preview version in a production environment might introduce instability or breaking changes.
Please ensure that:
- This preview version is compatible with your project and doesn't introduce any breaking changes.
- You have a plan to update to the stable version once it's released.
- All functionalities depending on this package are thoroughly tested with the new version.
Run the following script to check for any YamlDotNet usage in the project:
✅ Verification successful
</run_scripts>
Verified no active usage of the preview version of Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet in the main project code.
The package
Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNetis referenced in the project file and used in tooling and globalization extension files. There are no detected usages in critical production code areas. However, it's recommended to:
- Manually verify that
YamlDotNetis not used in other parts of the codebase.- Ensure that using a preview version does not affect project stability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for YamlDotNet usage in the project # Search for YamlDotNet usage echo "Searching for YamlDotNet usage:" rg --type csharp "YamlDotNet" -A 5Length of output: 12311
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Correctly check for YamlDotNet usage in the project echo "Searching for YamlDotNet usage:" rg --type csharp "YamlDotNet" -A 5Length of output: 1655
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/ExceptionConverter.cs (3)
61-62: Properly passingoptionstoParseJsonReaderAdding the
optionsparameter to theReadmethod and passing it toParseJsonReaderenhances configurability and ensures consistent serialization settings are applied during deserialization.
65-65: IncludingoptionsinParseJsonReadermethod signatureUpdating the
ParseJsonReadermethod to acceptoptionsallows for customized deserialization, leveraging the providedJsonSerializerOptionsfor property value deserialization.
Line range hint
156-158: Verify the existence ofSetPropertyNamemethod inJsonSerializerOptionsThe usage of
options.SetPropertyNamein theWritemethod is not standard forJsonSerializerOptions. Ensure thatSetPropertyNameis a correctly defined extension method or part of your custom implementation.Run the following script to verify whether the
SetPropertyNameextension method is defined in the codebase:✅ Verification successful
SetPropertyName Method Verification Completed
The
SetPropertyNameextension method forJsonSerializerOptionsis correctly defined inJsonSerializerOptionsExtensions.cs.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of 'SetPropertyName' extension method for JsonSerializerOptions # Test: Find extension methods named 'SetPropertyName' for 'JsonSerializerOptions' rg --type cs 'static.*SetPropertyName\(this JsonSerializerOptions'Length of output: 229
src/Cuemon.Extensions.IO/StreamExtensions.cs (1)
315-317: Review preprocessor directives for target framework compatibilityAs previously mentioned, the preprocessor directive
#if NETSTANDARD2_1_OR_GREATER || NET8_0_OR_GREATERmay be redundant. Ensure that the directives align with the targeted frameworks.src/Cuemon.IO/Extensions/StreamDecoratorExtensions.cs (2)
Line range hint
499-514: Ensure Consistent Use of Asynchronous Streams in DecompressionIn the
DecompressAsyncmethod, confirm that all asynchronous stream operations are properly awaited and that resource disposal is correctly handled to prevent memory leaks.Run the following script to verify proper use of
awaitand resource disposal:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for awaited asynchronous operations and correct disposal patterns. rg --type cs "DecompressAsync" -A 20 | rg -E "await|using|DisposeAsync"
Line range hint
463-478: Verify Asynchronous Compression Handles Cancellation Tokens AppropriatelyIn the
CompressAsyncmethod, ensure that theCancellationTokenis properly passed through all asynchronous operations to allow for cancellation if needed.Run the following script to check for proper usage of
CancellationToken:test/Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Tests/ServiceCollectionExtensionsTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
389-563: Unit Tests for .NET 8.0 Compatibility are Comprehensive and CorrectThe newly added unit tests under the
#if NET8_0_OR_GREATERdirective effectively validate the behavior of theServiceCollectionextensions in .NET 8.0. They cover scenarios forTryConfigure,Configure, andPostConfigureAllOfmethods, ensuring that configuration options are added, combined, and synchronized as intended.
| <ItemGroup> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json" Version="9.0.0-preview.1" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore" Version="9.0.0-preview.4" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore" Version="9.0.0-preview.8" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Package Update Introduces Breaking Changes
The update of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore from version 9.0.0-preview.4 to 9.0.0-preview.8 has been verified against the changelog. Notably, in version 9.0.0, the package Cuemon.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore has been removed and migrated to Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.
Action Required:
- Update Package References: Ensure that your project references the new package
Codebelt.Extensions.Xunitinstead of the deprecatedCuemon.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore. - Refactor Codebase: Modify any existing code that depends on the old package to align with the new package's namespace and functionality.
- Verify Dependencies: Check for any additional dependencies or configuration changes required by the new package version.
Failing to make these adjustments may result in build errors or runtime issues due to missing or incompatible dependencies.
🔗 Analysis chain
Package reference update for Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore
The package reference for Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore has been updated from version 9.0.0-preview.4 to 9.0.0-preview.8. This update aligns with the PR objective of ensuring compatibility with .NET 8.0 and modernizing the codebase.
To ensure this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes or deprecations, let's verify the changelog or release notes for this package:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for changelog or release notes of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore
# Search for a changelog file
changelog=$(fd -i -t f "changelog|release.?notes" --exec echo {})
if [ -n "$changelog" ]; then
echo "Changelog found: $changelog"
echo "Content:"
cat "$changelog"
else
echo "No changelog found in the repository."
echo "Please manually verify the changes between versions 9.0.0-preview.4 and 9.0.0-preview.8 of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore."
fi
Length of output: 3252
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for common changelog or release notes files related to Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore
# Define potential changelog filenames
changelog_files=("CHANGELOG.md" "CHANGELOG.txt" "RELEASE_NOTES.md" "RELEASE_NOTES.txt")
# Initialize a flag to track if any changelog files are found
found=false
# Iterate over each potential changelog filename
for file in "${changelog_files[@]}"; do
# Search for the file within the repository
matches=$(fd -i -t f -p "$file")
if [ -n "$matches" ]; then
found=true
echo "Changelog found: $matches"
echo "Content:"
cat "$matches"
fi
done
if [ "$found" = false ]; then
echo "No changelog or release notes found for Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore in the repository."
echo "Please manually verify the changes between versions 9.0.0-preview.4 and 9.0.0-preview.8."
fi
Length of output: 180294
|
|
||
| <ItemGroup> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet" Version="8.4.0" PrivateAssets="all" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet" Version="9.0.0-preview.3" PrivateAssets="all" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Potential Risks Identified with YamlDotNet Package Update
The Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet package has been updated from version 8.4.0 to 9.0.0-preview.3. While there is no evidence of YAML-specific tests, the major version bump and preview status introduce potential risks:
- Breaking Changes: Major updates may include API changes that could affect existing functionality.
- Stability Concerns: Preview versions are not recommended for production use due to possible bugs and incomplete features.
- Lack of Test Coverage: The absence of YAML-related tests indicates that YAML functionalities might not be thoroughly validated against the new version.
Recommendations:
- Manual Testing: Perform comprehensive manual testing of any YAML-related features to ensure compatibility.
- Stable Release Consideration: Prefer using a stable release version of the package for production environments to mitigate risks.
- Add Tests: Implement tests for YAML serialization and deserialization to enhance coverage and detect potential issues early.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify compatibility and stability of the updated YamlDotNet package
The Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet package has been updated from version 8.4.0 to 9.0.0-preview.3. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating components for .NET 8.0 compatibility. However, there are a few points to consider:
- This is a major version update (8.x.x to 9.x.x), which may introduce breaking changes. Ensure that your code is compatible with any API changes in the new version.
- The new version is a preview release (
9.0.0-preview.3). Preview versions are typically not recommended for production use due to potential instability or incomplete features.
To ensure the update doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following verification steps:
After running these checks, please review the results to identify any code that might be affected by the update. Consider running your test suite, especially any tests related to YAML functionality, to ensure everything works as expected with the new version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for YAML-related code that might be affected by the YamlDotNet update
# Search for YAML-related code
echo "Searching for YAML-related code:"
rg --type csharp "YamlDotNet" -A 5 -B 5
# Search for any YAML deserialization or serialization
echo "Searching for YAML deserialization or serialization:"
rg --type csharp "Deserialize|Serialize.*yaml" -i
# Check if there are any tests related to YAML functionality
echo "Checking for YAML-related tests:"
fd test.*yaml -e cs
Length of output: 28082
| { | ||
| var sut1 = new UserAgentException(400, "Bad Request."); | ||
| var sut2 = new NewtonsoftJsonFormatter(); | ||
| var sut2 = new JsonFormatter(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Remaining usages of NewtonsoftJsonFormatter detected.
While the replacement in UserAgentExceptionTest.cs aligns with the PR's objective, the following files still use NewtonsoftJsonFormatter:
test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests/Diagnostics/ServiceProviderExtensionsTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Throttling/ThrottlingSentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/UserAgentSentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/ApiKeySentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs
Please update these instances to ensure a complete transition to System.Text.Json.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: JsonFormatter replacement is consistent with PR objectives.
The change from NewtonsoftJsonFormatter to JsonFormatter aligns with the PR's goal of transitioning to System.Text.Json. The test logic and expected output remain unchanged, suggesting that the new JsonFormatter maintains compatibility with the existing serialization format.
To ensure the change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, let's verify the usage of JsonFormatter:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of JsonFormatter across the codebase
# Test: Search for JsonFormatter usage
echo "Searching for JsonFormatter usage:"
rg --type csharp -A 5 "new JsonFormatter"
# Test: Check if there are any remaining NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usages
echo "Checking for any remaining NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usages:"
rg --type csharp "NewtonsoftJsonFormatter"
Length of output: 47301
| using Cuemon.Extensions.IO; | ||
| using Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Formatters; | ||
| using Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit; | ||
| using Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete Migration from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json
The following files still reference Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json.Formatters and use NewtonsoftJsonFormatter:
test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests/Diagnostics/ServiceProviderExtensionsTest.cstest/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/AuthorizationResponseHandlerTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/ApiKeySentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/UserAgentSentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Throttling/ThrottlingSentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs- (Additional files as listed in the shell script output)
Action Required:
- Remove all instances of
Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Newtonsoft.Json.Formatters. - Replace
NewtonsoftJsonFormatterwith the appropriateSystem.Text.Jsonalternatives.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approve namespace change and verify its impact.
The change from Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Formatters to Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. This is a positive change that modernizes the codebase.
To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json across the codebase.
# Test 1: Check for any remaining usages of Newtonsoft.Json
echo "Checking for remaining Newtonsoft.Json usages:"
rg --type csharp "using.*Newtonsoft\.Json"
# Test 2: Verify the adoption of System.Text.Json
echo "Verifying System.Text.Json adoption:"
rg --type csharp "using.*System\.Text\.Json"
# Test 3: Check for any remaining JsonFormatter usages from Newtonsoft
echo "Checking for remaining NewtonsoftJsonFormatter usages:"
rg --type csharp "NewtonsoftJsonFormatter"
# Test 4: Verify the adoption of JsonFormatter from System.Text.Json
echo "Verifying JsonFormatter adoption from System.Text.Json:"
rg --type csharp "JsonFormatter"
Length of output: 37921
| using Cuemon.Extensions.IO; | ||
| using Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Formatters; | ||
| using Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit; | ||
| using Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent JSON Import Usage Detected
The following files still import Newtonsoft.Json:
test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests/Diagnostics/ServiceProviderExtensionsTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Throttling/ThrottlingSentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/ApiKeySentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/UserAgentSentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/AuthorizationResponseHandlerTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests/Diagnostics/ApplicationBuilderExtensionsTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs
Please update these imports to use Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters to ensure a complete transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Import statement updated to use System.Text.Json
The change from Codebelt.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json.Formatters to Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
Let's verify if this change is consistent across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining Newtonsoft.Json imports and new System.Text.Json imports
echo "Checking for remaining Newtonsoft.Json imports:"
rg --type csharp "using.*Newtonsoft\.Json"
echo "Checking for new System.Text.Json imports:"
rg --type csharp "using.*System\.Text\.Json"
echo "Checking for custom Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json imports:"
rg --type csharp "using.*Cuemon\.Extensions\.Text\.Json"
Length of output: 10148
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #if NET6_0_OR_GREATER | ||
| #if NET8_0_OR_GREATER |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Brotli compression tests limited to .NET 8.0 may reduce coverage for earlier versions
The changes restrict Brotli compression and decompression tests to .NET 8.0 or higher. However, Brotli functionalities are still utilized in the production code for .NET 6.0 and 7.0. This may result in untested code paths for these earlier versions.
- Consider adding or maintaining Brotli tests for .NET 6.0 and 7.0 to ensure comprehensive test coverage.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider the implications of restricting Brotli tests to .NET 8.0+
The preprocessor directive has been updated from NET6_0_OR_GREATER to NET8_0_OR_GREATER, which aligns with the PR objective of supporting .NET 8.0. However, this change has some important implications:
- Brotli compression tests will now only be compiled and executed for .NET 8.0 or higher versions.
- This may reduce test coverage for earlier .NET versions (6.0 and 7.0) that previously included these tests.
To ensure that this change doesn't unintentionally reduce test coverage for supported .NET versions, please run the following script:
If the search returns results, it might indicate that Brotli compression is still supported in earlier .NET versions, and we should consider keeping these tests for those versions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Brotli compression is supported in earlier .NET versions
rg --type csharp 'BrotliStream|BrotliEncoder|BrotliDecoder' -g '!test/**'
Length of output: 865
| #if NET8_0_OR_GREATER | ||
| var createMethod = enumConverterFactory.GetMethod("Create", MemberReflection.Everything, new[] { typeof(Type), enumConverterOptions, typeof(JsonNamingPolicy), typeof(JsonSerializerOptions) }); | ||
| if (createMethod != null) | ||
| { | ||
| return (JsonConverter)createMethod.Invoke(null, new object[] { typeToConvert, 1, options.PropertyNamingPolicy, options }); | ||
| } | ||
| #else | ||
| var createMethod = enumConverterFactory.GetMethod("Create", MemberReflection.Everything, null, new[] { typeof(Type), enumConverterOptions, typeof(JsonNamingPolicy), typeof(JsonSerializerOptions) }, null); | ||
| if (createMethod != null) | ||
| { | ||
| return (JsonConverter)createMethod.Invoke(null, new object[] { typeToConvert, 1, options.PropertyNamingPolicy, options }); | ||
| } | ||
| #endif |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using JsonStringEnumConverter to simplify enum conversion
The current implementation relies on reflection to access internal types and methods like EnumConverterFactory and EnumConverterOptions. Accessing internal types via reflection can lead to maintainability issues and potential breakage in future .NET versions.
Instead, you can use the built-in JsonStringEnumConverter provided by System.Text.Json. This converter handles enum-to-string conversion and can be configured with naming policies.
Here's how you might implement it:
public class StringEnumConverter : JsonStringEnumConverter
{
public StringEnumConverter() : base(namingPolicy: null, allowIntegerValues: false)
{
}
}This approach leverages the public API and avoids reflection, enhancing compatibility with future .NET versions.
| using System.IO; | ||
| using System.Text.Json; | ||
| using System.Text.Json.Serialization; | ||
| using System.Xml; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary using directive
The using System.Xml; directive is unnecessary since System.Xml types are not used in this file.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary using directive:
-using System.Xml;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| using System.Xml; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, netstandard2.0)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, net8.0)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Release, net9.0)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, netstandard2.0)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, net8.0)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
🪛 GitHub Check: 🛠️ Build (Debug, net9.0)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
[warning] 5-5:
Using directive is unnecessary. (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0005)
| else | ||
| { | ||
| var propertyValue = JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, property.PropertyType); | ||
| var propertyValue = JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, property.PropertyType, options); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure exception handling during deserialization with options
While deserializing property values using JsonSerializer.Deserialize with options, consider handling potential exceptions that may arise from invalid JSON or type mismatches.
Implement error handling to gracefully manage deserialization errors, ensuring robustness in the conversion process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
.nuget/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (2)
9-9: LGTM! Consider adding more details about the new converters.The addition of information about the new extension methods
AddProblemDetailsConverterandAddHeaderDictionaryConverteris accurate and consistent with the PR objectives. This change effectively communicates the improvements made to theJsonConverterCollectionExtensionsclass.To provide more value to users, consider adding a brief description of what these new converters do. For example:
- EXTENDED JsonConverterCollectionExtensions class in the Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json.Converters namespace to include two new extension methods: AddProblemDetailsConverter and AddHeaderDictionaryConverter + EXTENDED JsonConverterCollectionExtensions class in the Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json.Converters namespace to include two new extension methods: + - AddProblemDetailsConverter: Adds a converter for serializing and deserializing ProblemDetails objects. + - AddHeaderDictionaryConverter: Adds a converter for handling IHeaderDictionary serialization and deserialization.This additional information would help users understand the purpose and potential use cases for these new converters.
Line range hint
1-9: Consider adding more details about major changes in version 9.0.0While the current release notes accurately reflect some of the changes, they could be more comprehensive given the significance of the updates mentioned in the PR objectives.
Consider adding the following points to provide a more complete picture of the changes in version 9.0.0:
- Mention the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
- Note the updates to project files and code for .NET 8.0 compatibility.
- Include information about the new
Bootstrapperclass with theModuleInitializer.Here's a suggested addition:
Version 9.0.0 Availability: .NET 9 and .NET 8 # ALM - CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs - REMOVED Support for TFM .NET 6 (LTS) + - UPDATED Project files and code to support .NET 8.0 + - CHANGED JSON serialization from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json # Improvements - EXTENDED JsonConverterCollectionExtensions class in the Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json.Converters namespace to include two new extension methods: AddProblemDetailsConverter and AddHeaderDictionaryConverter + - ADDED New Bootstrapper class with ModuleInitializer to configure default JSON converters + - UPDATED JsonFormatter to implement different serialization logic based on .NET versionThese additions would provide users with a more comprehensive understanding of the significant changes in this version.
.nuget/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (2)
5-7: Consider the impact of removing .NET 6 support and clarify dependency changes.
The removal of .NET 6 (LTS) support might affect users still on that version. Consider adding a note about migration paths or reasons for this change.
The addition of .NET Standard 2.0 support is great for broadening compatibility.
For clarity, consider rephrasing "with respect to TFMs" to something more specific, like "for all Target Framework Monikers (TFMs)".
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs - REMOVED Support for TFM .NET 6 (...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
1-17: Comprehensive and well-structured release notes for version 9.0.0The release notes effectively communicate the significant changes in this version:
- Expanded framework support, including .NET Standard 2.0.
- New features like FailureConverter for enhanced JSON serialization.
- Improvements to JSON converter and serializer options management.
- Important bug fix for exception handling during JSON deserialization.
These changes align well with the PR objectives of cleanup, feature enhancement, and transition to System.Text.Json. The notes provide clear information for users upgrading to this version.
Consider adding a brief mention of the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json, as it's a significant change mentioned in the PR objectives but not explicitly stated in the release notes.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs - REMOVED Support for TFM .NET 6 (...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
CHANGELOG.md (4)
Line range hint
21-27: Removal of features and potential breaking changesSeveral features have been removed or migrated to separate projects under the Codebelt organization. This includes Xunit extensions, YamlDotNet extensions, and Swashbuckle.AspNetCore extensions. These changes may require significant updates to existing projects using these features.
Consider providing migration guides or documentation to help users transition from the removed features to their new locations or alternatives.
Line range hint
48-85: Extensive changes to existing classes and methodsMany existing classes and methods have been renamed, moved, or refactored. Some notable changes include:
- Renaming of various authentication-related classes
- Updates to caching and data integrity classes
- Changes to XML and JSON serialization classes
These changes improve consistency and follow better naming conventions, but they may require significant updates to existing codebases.
Consider providing a detailed migration guide to help users update their code to accommodate these changes. Additionally, it might be helpful to provide code examples for the most commonly used features that have been modified.
Line range hint
127-231: Extensive removals and potential breaking changesA large number of classes, methods, and even entire namespaces have been removed. This includes:
- Removal of several utility classes
- Removal of some serialization-related classes
- Removal of entire namespaces (e.g., Cuemon.Data.XmlClient, Cuemon.Integrity)
These removals are likely to cause significant breaking changes for existing projects using this library.
- Provide a comprehensive list of alternatives or replacements for the removed functionality.
- Consider creating a separate document or wiki page detailing migration strategies for the most commonly used removed features.
- If possible, create a tool or script to help users identify usage of removed classes/methods in their codebase.
Migration Guide and Documentation Missing
- Migration guide
MIGRATION_GUIDE.mdnot found.- Documentation for version 9.0.0 appears to be missing or incomplete in the
docs/directory.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-231: Overall assessment of the changelogThis major release (9.0.0) represents a significant overhaul of the library, with numerous additions, changes, and removals. While it brings many improvements and new features, it also introduces a large number of breaking changes.
To ensure a smooth transition for users, consider the following actions:
- Provide a high-level summary of the most impactful changes at the beginning of the changelog.
- Create a separate migration guide document with step-by-step instructions for updating from the previous major version.
- Update all relevant documentation to reflect the changes in this release.
- Consider creating a series of blog posts or video tutorials to guide users through the major changes and new features.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if a migration guide exists if [ -f "MIGRATION_GUIDE.md" ]; then echo "Migration guide found." else echo "Migration guide not found. Consider creating one to help users transition to the new version." fi # Check if the documentation has been updated grep -r "9.0.0" docs/ if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Documentation appears to be updated for version 9.0.0" else echo "Documentation may need to be updated to reflect changes in version 9.0.0" fiLength of output: 462
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .nuget/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Json/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
- .nuget/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.nuget/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs - REMOVED Support for TFM .NET 6 (...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
.nuget/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (4)
2-2: Excellent addition of .NET Standard 2.0 support!The inclusion of .NET Standard 2.0 support significantly broadens the compatibility of the package. This allows for wider adoption across different .NET implementations.
10-10: Great addition of FailureConverter class!The new FailureConverter class in the Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Converters namespace enhances JSON serialization capabilities, aligning well with the PR objectives.
13-14: Excellent improvements to JSON serialization capabilities!The extensions to JsonConverterCollectionExtensions and JsonSerializerOptionsExtensions classes provide valuable new functionality:
- AddFailureConverter, RemoveAllOf, and RemoveAllOf{T} methods in JsonConverterCollectionExtensions enhance converter management.
- The new Clone method in JsonSerializerOptionsExtensions improves options handling.
These additions align well with the PR objectives of enhancing JSON serialization capabilities.
17-17: Important bug fix for ExceptionConverter!The update to use JsonSerializerOptions when converting JSON to Exception in the ExceptionConverter class is a crucial fix. This change ensures more accurate and consistent exception handling during JSON deserialization.
CHANGELOG.md (4)
12-14: Significant changes in this major releaseThis release (9.0.0) brings substantial changes to ensure compatibility with .NET 9 preview releases and improve the developer experience. It's important to note that breaking changes are expected with this major release.
Line range hint
16-19: New features addedThe addition of support for both
FaultDetailsandProblemDetailsin ASP.NET contexts enhances error handling capabilities. This is a positive improvement for API development.
Line range hint
29-46: Numerous additions to enhance functionalityA large number of new classes, interfaces, and methods have been added across various namespaces. Notable additions include:
- Support for AWS4-HMAC-SHA256 Authentication
- Enhancements to Swagger/OpenAPI support
- New JSON and YAML formatters and converters
- Improved error handling and diagnostics capabilities
These additions significantly expand the library's functionality and should provide developers with more tools and options.
Line range hint
87-125: Fixes and improvementsNumerous fixes have been applied to improve compliance with coding standards, fix bugs, and enhance performance. Some notable improvements include:
- Compliance with various SonarSource rules
- Fixes for potential security issues (e.g., CSRF, XSS)
- Performance improvements in serialization and deserialization
These fixes and improvements enhance the overall quality and security of the library.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests/Diagnostics/ServiceProviderExtensionsTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
22-34: Suggestion: Add a comment for contextConsider adding a comment to explain the removal of Newtonsoft.Json formatters. This will provide context for future developers who might be reviewing this test.
Here's a suggested comment to add before the
services.AddOptions()line:// Note: Newtonsoft.Json formatters have been removed as part of the transition to System.Text.Json
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests/Diagnostics/ApplicationBuilderExtensionsTest.cs (0 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/AuthorizationResponseHandlerTest.cs (0 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests/Diagnostics/ServiceProviderExtensionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests/Diagnostics/ApplicationBuilderExtensionsTest.cs
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/AuthorizationResponseHandlerTest.cs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication.Tests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj
| Assert.Equal(6, formattersAndResponseHandlers.Count); | ||
| Assert.Equal(""" | ||
| XmlFormatterOptions -> application/xml | ||
| XmlFormatterOptions -> text/xml | ||
| XmlFormatterOptions -> application/problem+xml | ||
| JsonFormatterOptions -> application/json | ||
| JsonFormatterOptions -> text/json | ||
| JsonFormatterOptions -> application/problem+json | ||
| NewtonsoftJsonFormatterOptions -> application/json | ||
| NewtonsoftJsonFormatterOptions -> text/json | ||
| NewtonsoftJsonFormatterOptions -> application/problem+json | ||
| """.ReplaceLineEndings(), formattersAndResponseHandlers.ToDelimitedString(o => o.Delimiter = Environment.NewLine)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Remove Remaining Newtonsoft.Json References in Test Files
The verification script identified several test files still importing Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Newtonsoft.Json. Please update these files to use System.Text.Json to ensure complete removal of Newtonsoft.Json references.
Affected files:
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/UserAgentSentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Throttling/ThrottlingSentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/ApiKeySentinelFilterTest.cstest/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Test updated to reflect removal of Newtonsoft.Json formatters
The test has been correctly updated to reflect the removal of the Newtonsoft.Json formatters. The expected count of formatters has been reduced from 9 to 6, and the assertion string no longer includes the Newtonsoft.Json related entries. This change aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json.
To ensure that no Newtonsoft.Json references remain in this file or related test files, let's run the following verification:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining Newtonsoft.Json references in test files
# Test: Search for Newtonsoft.Json references in test files
rg --type csharp 'Newtonsoft\.Json' test/
Length of output: 803
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/UserAgentSentinelFilterTest.cs (1)
38-38: LGTM: Replaced Newtonsoft.Json formatters with System.Text.Json formatters.This change aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. The new method
AddJsonFormatters()replaces the previous Newtonsoft.Json-specific methods.For improved clarity, consider renaming the extension method to
AddSystemTextJsonFormatters()or adding a comment to explicitly state that this adds System.Text.Json formatters. This would make the transition more evident to developers reading the test code.test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs (2)
Line range hint
556-582: Refactor duplicated code in test methods for better maintainabilityThe new test method
OnException_ShouldCaptureException_RenderAsProblemDetails_UsingXmlcontains code that is largely duplicated from other test methods. Refactoring the common code into a shared helper method can enhance maintainability and reduce redundancy.Consider extracting the setup and execution logic into a private helper method:
+private async Task<HttpResponseMessage> ExecuteFaultDescriptorTestAsync( + string acceptHeader, + PreferredFaultDescriptor faultDescriptor, + FaultSensitivityDetails sensitivity) +{ + return await WebHostTestFactory.RunAsync( + services => + { + services + .AddControllers(o => o.Filters.AddFaultDescriptor()) + .AddApplicationPart(typeof(StatusCodesController).Assembly) + .AddXmlFormatters(o => o.Settings.Writer.Indent = true) + .AddFaultDescriptorOptions(o => o.FaultDescriptor = faultDescriptor); + services.PostConfigureAllOf<IExceptionDescriptorOptions>(o => o.SensitivityDetails = sensitivity); + }, + app => + { + app.UseRouting(); + app.UseEndpoints(routes => { routes.MapControllers(); }); + }, + responseFactory: client => + { + client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Accept.Add(MediaTypeWithQualityHeaderValue.Parse(acceptHeader)); + return client.GetAsync("/statuscodes/XXX/serverError"); + }); +} Then, update the test method to use this helper: ```diff public async Task OnException_ShouldCaptureException_RenderAsProblemDetails_UsingXml(FaultSensitivityDetails sensitivity) { - using var response = await WebHostTestFactory.RunAsync( - // setup code... - ); + using var response = await ExecuteFaultDescriptorTestAsync( + "application/xml", + PreferredFaultDescriptor.ProblemDetails, + sensitivity); var body = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync(); TestOutput.WriteLine(body); // Assertions... }This approach promotes code reuse and simplifies future updates.
Line range hint
584-610: Update method name for clarity and consistencyThe method name
OnException_ShouldCaptureException_RenderAsDefault_UsingXmlmay cause confusion regarding what "Default" refers to. To enhance clarity, consider renaming the method to reflect the specific fault descriptor being tested.For example:
-public async Task OnException_ShouldCaptureException_RenderAsDefault_UsingXml(FaultSensitivityDetails sensitivity) +public async Task OnException_ShouldCaptureException_RenderAsFaultDetails_UsingXml(FaultSensitivityDetails sensitivity)This makes it explicit that the test is using the
FaultDetailsdescriptor with XML formatting.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests.csproj (2 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs (18 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/ApiKeySentinelFilterTest.cs (3 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/UserAgentSentinelFilterTest.cs (3 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Throttling/ThrottlingSentinelFilterTest.cs (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests.csproj
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests.csproj
🔇 Additional comments (15)
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Throttling/ThrottlingSentinelFilterTest.cs (4)
12-12: LGTM: Appropriate using statement added for Text.Json formatters.This change aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
Line range hint
1-141: Overall assessment: Changes successfully implement JSON serialization transition.The modifications in this file consistently replace Newtonsoft.Json with System.Text.Json formatters, aligning well with the PR objectives. The overall structure and intent of the tests remain intact, ensuring continued validation of the throttling mechanism. These changes contribute positively to the codebase modernization efforts.
91-91: LGTM: Successfully transitioned to Text.Json formatter.The change from Newtonsoft.Json to Text.Json is correctly implemented. The test's structure and intent remain intact, ensuring continued validation of the throttling mechanism's exception throwing behavior.
To ensure the test's continued validity with the new JSON formatter, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test passes with the new JSON formatter dotnet test --filter "FullyQualifiedName~ThrottlingSentinelFilterTest.OnActionExecutionAsync_ShouldThrowThrottlingException"
40-40: LGTM: Successfully transitioned to Text.Json formatter.The change from Newtonsoft.Json to Text.Json is correctly implemented. The test's structure and intent remain intact, ensuring continued validation of the throttling mechanism.
To ensure the test's continued validity with the new JSON formatter, please run the following command:
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/ApiKeySentinelFilterTest.cs (3)
10-10: LGTM: Appropriate using statement added for System.Text.Json formattersThis change aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. The new using statement is necessary for the subsequent changes in the test methods.
Line range hint
1-236: Overall assessment: Changes successfully implement System.Text.JsonThe modifications in this file successfully transition the
ApiKeySentinelFilterTestfrom using Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json, aligning with the PR objectives. The changes are consistent and do not alter the core functionality of the tests. Good job on maintaining the integrity of the test suite while updating the JSON serialization framework.
36-36: LGTM: Consistent replacement of Newtonsoft.Json with System.Text.Json formattersThe change from
.AddNewtonsoftJsonFormatters()to.AddJsonFormatters()is consistent with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json. This modification has been applied consistently across multiple test methods in the file.To ensure all instances have been updated, run the following script:
This script should only return instances of
.AddJsonFormatters()if all have been correctly updated.Also applies to: 62-62
✅ Verification successful
Verified: All JsonFormatter instances are correctly updated
All instances of
.AddNewtonsoftJsonFormatters()have been successfully replaced with.AddJsonFormatters()inApiKeySentinelFilterTest.csat lines 36 and 62.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify all instances of JsonFormatters have been updated rg --type csharp 'Add(Newtonsoft)?JsonFormatters' test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/ApiKeySentinelFilterTest.csLength of output: 225
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Headers/UserAgentSentinelFilterTest.cs (3)
8-8: LGTM: New using statement for Text.Json formatters.This change aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. The new using statement is necessary for the subsequent changes in the file.
70-70: LGTM: Consistent use of System.Text.Json formatters.This change is consistent with the previous modification and aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to System.Text.Json.
Please refer to the previous comment regarding the suggestion for improved clarity in naming or documentation of the
AddJsonFormatters()method.
Line range hint
1-270: Summary: Successful transition to System.Text.Json in UserAgentSentinelFilterTestThe changes in this file consistently implement the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json across all test methods, aligning with the PR objectives. The test coverage and scenarios remain unchanged, which maintains the integrity of the test suite.
To ensure comprehensive test coverage with the new JSON serialization framework, consider running the following verification:
If the script identifies any System.Text.Json-specific features used in the main code that are not covered in this test file, consider adding new test scenarios to ensure comprehensive coverage of the new JSON serialization framework.
✅ Verification successful
Transition to System.Text.Json Verified
The
UserAgentSentinelFilterTest.csfile has successfully transitioned fromNewtonsoft.JsontoSystem.Text.Json. All test methods are consistent with the main codebase, and the integrity of the test suite is maintained without introducing any discrepancies.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any System.Text.Json-specific APIs or features used in the main code that might require additional test coverage. # Test: Search for System.Text.Json usage in the main code rg --type csharp -g '!*.Test*.cs' 'System.Text.Json' # Analyze the output to identify any System.Text.Json-specific features that might need additional test coverage in this test file.Length of output: 4922
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.Tests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs (4)
11-11: LGTM: New JSON formatter import added.The addition of
using Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json;is consistent with the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating the codebase to use the new JSON serialization framework.
Line range hint
1-638: Overall assessment: Successful transition to System.Text.JsonThe changes in this file consistently implement the transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json across all test methods. This aligns perfectly with the PR objective of updating the codebase to support .NET 8.0 and moving to System.Text.Json for JSON serialization.
Key points:
- All instances of
AddNewtonsoftJson()have been replaced withAddJsonFormatters().- The existing test logic and assertions remain unchanged, which should preserve the original test coverage.
- The changes are systematic and consistent throughout the file.
To ensure the transition hasn't introduced any unintended side effects, please run the existing test suite and verify that all tests in this file pass successfully. If any tests fail, investigate whether it's due to differences in JSON serialization behavior between Newtonsoft.Json and System.Text.Json.
106-106: LGTM: Consistent update of JSON formatters across all test methods.The systematic replacement of
AddNewtonsoftJson()withAddJsonFormatters()across all test methods is correct and aligns with the PR objective of transitioning from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json. This consistent change ensures that all tests are updated to use the new JSON serialization framework.To ensure that all instances have been updated correctly, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify complete transition from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json echo "Checking for any remaining Newtonsoft.Json usage:" rg --type csharp "AddNewtonsoftJson|NewtonsoftJson" echo "Verifying consistent use of new JSON formatters:" rg --type csharp "AddJsonFormatters"If the script finds any remaining instances of Newtonsoft.Json or inconsistencies in the use of the new JSON formatters, please review and update accordingly.
Also applies to: 144-144, 183-183, 216-216, 249-249, 282-282, 315-315, 348-348, 381-381, 414-414, 447-447, 480-480, 513-513, 546-546, 579-579, 609-609
37-38: LGTM: JSON formatter updated, verify option compatibility.The replacement of
AddNewtonsoftJson()withAddJsonFormatters()is correct and aligns with the transition to System.Text.Json. TheUseBaseExceptionoption is maintained, which is good for consistency.Please verify that the
UseBaseExceptionoption is fully compatible with the new JSON formatter. Run the following script to check for any related configuration options:✅ Verification successful
Verified: JSON formatter migration successful and
UseBaseExceptionis compatible.
- No remaining references to
AddNewtonsoftJsonfound.UseBaseExceptionoption is consistently maintained withAddJsonFormatters.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for UseBaseException option usage and related configurations # Search for UseBaseException usage echo "Searching for UseBaseException usage:" rg --type csharp "UseBaseException" # Search for related JSON formatter configurations echo "Searching for JSON formatter configurations:" rg --type csharp "AddJsonFormatters|ConfigureJsonFormatter"Length of output: 5026
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retry searching for UseBaseException usage and related JSON formatter configurations # Search for UseBaseException usage echo "Searching for UseBaseException usage:" rg --type csharp "UseBaseException" # Search for related JSON formatter configurations echo "Searching for JSON formatter configurations:" rg --type csharp "AddJsonFormatters|ConfigureJsonFormatter"Length of output: 6126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retry searching for UseBaseException usage and related JSON formatter configurations # Search for UseBaseException usage echo "Searching for UseBaseException usage:" rg --type csharp "UseBaseException" # Search for related JSON formatter configurations: echo "Searching for JSON formatter configurations:" rg --type csharp "AddJsonFormatters|ConfigureJsonFormatter"Length of output: 6126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility of UseBaseException with AddJsonFormatters and ensure no AddNewtonsoftJson usage remains # Search for instances where UseBaseException and AddJsonFormatters are used together echo "Searching for combined usage of UseBaseException and AddJsonFormatters:" rg --type csharp "AddJsonFormatters.*UseBaseException" # Confirm there are no remaining usages of AddNewtonsoftJson echo "Checking for any remaining AddNewtonsoftJson usage:" rg --type csharp "AddNewtonsoftJson"Length of output: 359
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
556-610: Verify removal of Newtonsoft.Json dependenciesAccording to the PR objectives, there's a shift from
Newtonsoft.JsontoSystem.Text.Json. Ensure that all references toNewtonsoft.Jsonhave been removed from the codebase to prevent lingering dependencies.Run the following script to check for any remaining
Newtonsoft.Jsonreferences:This will help confirm that the transition to
System.Text.Jsonis complete.✅ Verification successful
Removal of Newtonsoft.Json Dependencies Verified Successfully
All active references to
Newtonsoft.Jsonhave been removed from the codebase. Only documentation comments referenceNewtonsoft.Json, ensuring no lingering runtime dependencies.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to Newtonsoft.Json in the codebase # Test: Find occurrences of Newtonsoft.Json usage. Expect: No matches. rg --type cs 'Newtonsoft\.Json'Length of output: 716
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #91 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.15% 80.23% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 617 617
Lines 18940 19020 +80
Branches 1907 1915 +8
==========================================
+ Hits 15181 15260 +79
- Misses 3709 3710 +1
Partials 50 50 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
gimlichael
deleted the
v9.0.0/service-pack-including-switch-to-system-text-json
branch
PR Classification
Code cleanup and feature enhancement to support .NET 8.0 and transition to System.Text.Json.
PR Summary
Updated project files and code to ensure compatibility with .NET 8.0 and switched JSON serialization from Newtonsoft.Json to System.Text.Json.
NET8_0_OR_GREATERacross multiple files,NewtonsoftJsonFormatterwithJsonFormatterin various test files,AddHeaderDictionaryConverterandRemoveAllOfmethods inJsonConverterCollectionExtensions.cs,JsonFormatter.csto use different serialization logic based onNET8_0_OR_GREATER,Bootstrapperclass with aModuleInitializerto configure default JSON converters.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
xunit,xunit.runner.console, andCodebelt.Extensions.Xunitto ensure compatibility and incorporate fixes.Tests
Chores