Skip to content

Conversation

@gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Nov 11, 2024

This pull request includes updates to package versions and documentation. The most important changes include updating the release date in the changelog and updating package versions to release candidates.

Documentation updates:

  • CHANGELOG.md: Updated the release date for version 9.0.0 to 2024-11-13.

Package version updates:

  • Directory.Packages.props: Updated Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App and Cuemon.Core package versions from preview to release candidate.
  • Directory.Packages.props: Updated Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk, Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub, and MinVer package versions to their latest versions.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes for Version 9.0.0 (2024-11-13)

  • New Features

    • Introduced new classes and interfaces for enhanced unit measurement, including BaseUnit, Unit, UnitFactory, and UnitFormatter.
    • Added methods for handling unit prefixes with MetricPrefixTable, PrefixExtensions, and PrefixTableExtensions.
  • Improvements

    • Refactored existing classes to improve structure and clarity, including changes to StorageCapacity and MultipleTable.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated classes BitStorageCapacity and ByteStorageCapacity.
  • Chores

    • Updated package dependencies to the latest release candidates.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Nov 11, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request encompass updates to the Codebelt.Unitify namespace, including the addition of new structures, interfaces, and classes, as well as significant refactoring and renaming of existing entities. Notable removals include the BitStorageCapacity and ByteStorageCapacity classes. Additionally, the Directory.Packages.props file has been modified to update the version numbers of two package dependencies to release candidates.

Changes

File Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Updated to reflect release version 9.0.0 and added new entities in the Codebelt.Unitify namespace.
Codebelt.Unitify - Added: BaseUnit, IBaseUnit, MetricPrefixTable, PrefixExtensions, PrefixTableExtensions, Unit, UnitFactory, UnitFormatter classes.
- Removed: BitStorageCapacity, ByteStorageCapacity classes.
- Refactored: StorageCapacity to DataPrefixTable, MultipleTable to PrefixTable, PrefixMultiple to Prefix, IPrefixMultiple to IPrefix, and UnitPrefix to PrefixStyle. Updated IPrefixUnit and refactored PrefixUnit and UnitPrefixFormatter.
Directory.Packages.props Updated version numbers for Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App and Cuemon.Core dependencies.

Poem

In the land of Codebelt, changes abound,
New units and prefixes, all neatly found.
With a hop and a skip, we refactor with glee,
A cleaner design, as bright as can be!
So let’s celebrate, with a joyful cheer,
For version nine point oh, is finally here! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.33%. Comparing base (3f809b2) to head (321dc4a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main       #3   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.33%   83.33%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines         666      666           
  Branches       51       51           
=======================================
  Hits          555      555           
  Misses        110      110           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

Line range hint 12-24: Consider grouping related additions for better readability.

While the entries are well-documented, consider organizing them into logical groups. For example:

  1. Core Structures and Interfaces:

    • BaseUnit struct
    • IBaseUnit interface
    • Unit class
  2. Prefix-related Classes:

    • MetricPrefixTable
    • PrefixExtensions
    • PrefixTableExtensions
    • PrefixUnitExtensions
  3. Utility Classes:

    • UnitFactory
    • UnitFormatter

This grouping would make it easier for readers to understand related changes.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~8-~8: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...er.

[!NOTE]
Changelog entries prior to version 9.0.0 was migrated from previou...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3f809b2 and 321dc4a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Directory.Packages.props (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Directory.Packages.props
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)

10-10: LGTM! Release header follows the standard format.

The version number and release date are correctly formatted according to Keep a Changelog standards and match the PR objectives.


Line range hint 26-36: Verify completeness of the Changed section.

The AI summary mentions significant refactoring and renaming of existing entities, but some changes might be missing from the changelog. For example, the summary mentions changes to IPrefixUnit interface's PrefixValue property, which should be explicitly documented in the changelog.

✅ Verification successful

The changelog entry for IPrefixUnit interface changes is accurate and complete.

The changelog correctly states that "IPrefixUnit interface in the Codebelt.Unitify namespace was refactored to not include PrefixValue property". The search results confirm this change as:

  1. The old PrefixValue property is no longer present in the interface
  2. The functionality has been moved to extension methods in PrefixUnitExtensions class, which is also documented in the changelog: "PrefixUnitExtensions class... that provides extension methods for the PrefixUnit class: ToPrefixValue, ToBaseValue..."
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for IPrefixUnit interface changes in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IPrefixUnit {
  $$$
  PrefixValue
  $$$
}'

# Search for any remaining references to PrefixValue
rg "PrefixValue" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 5630

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~8-~8: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...er.

[!NOTE]
Changelog entries prior to version 9.0.0 was migrated from previou...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit 4acdac1 into main Nov 11, 2024
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v9.0.0/prepare-for-launch branch November 11, 2024 22:57
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants