Ossf/gha scorecard #5
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes include modifications to GitHub Actions workflows and updates to the README file. The Changes
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@gimlichael has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 83.33% 83.33%
=======================================
Files 19 19
Lines 666 666
Branches 51 51
=======================================
Hits 555 555
Misses 110 110
Partials 1 1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
gimlichael
had a problem deploying
to
Production
GitHub Actions
Error
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (1)
1-10: Consider optimizing the schedule timingThe workflow is well-structured with appropriate triggers. However, consider adjusting the schedule to run during off-peak hours to minimize resource contention.
- - cron: '45 17 * * 2' + - cron: '0 2 * * 2' # Run at 2 AM UTC on TuesdaysThe
read-alldefault permission follows security best practices..github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-15: Consider adding SLSA provenance generationSince this PR focuses on security improvements and supply chain security (as evidenced by the new scorecard workflow), consider enhancing the pipeline's security posture by adding SLSA provenance generation for the NuGet packages.
This would complement the existing security measures (CodeQL, SonarCloud) and align with the PR's security objectives.
Would you like me to provide an example configuration for implementing SLSA provenance generation in this workflow?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/scorecard.yml(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.md
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (2)
11-18: LGTM! Well-configured job permissions
The job configuration follows security best practices:
- Specific write permissions only where needed (security-events and id-token)
- Uses latest Ubuntu runner for up-to-date security patches
19-42: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance security and reliability of workflow steps
While the steps are well-structured, consider these security improvements:
- Pin third-party actions to specific SHA commits for better supply chain security
- Consider extending artifact retention for longer analysis history
- Add error handling for upload steps
Apply these changes:
- name: "Checkout code"
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
+ uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608 # v4.1.0
with:
persist-credentials: false
- name: "Run analysis"
- uses: ossf/scorecard-action@v2.4.0
+ uses: ossf/scorecard-action@e38b1902ae4f44df626f11ba0734b14fb91345aa # v2.4.0
with:
results_file: results.sarif
results_format: sarif
publish_results: true
- name: "Upload artifact"
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@c7d193f32edcb7bfad88892161225aeda64e9392 # v4.0.0
with:
name: SARIF file
path: results.sarif
- retention-days: 5
+ retention-days: 30
+ continue-on-error: true
- name: "Upload to code-scanning"
- uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
+ uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@407ffafae6a767df3e0230c3df91b6443ae8df75 # v3.22.11
with:
sarif_file: results.sarif
+ continue-on-error: trueRun this script to verify the latest versions and SHAs of the actions:
✅ Verification successful
Update GitHub Action SHAs to latest verified versions
Apply these security improvements:
- Pin actions to latest verified SHA commits
- Extend artifact retention period
- Add error handling for upload steps
- name: "Checkout code"
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
+ uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608 # v4.1.0
with:
persist-credentials: false
- name: "Run analysis"
- uses: ossf/scorecard-action@v2.4.0
+ uses: ossf/scorecard-action@ff5dd8929f96a8a4dc67d13f32b8c75057829621 # v2.4.0
with:
results_file: results.sarif
results_format: sarif
publish_results: true
- name: "Upload artifact"
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@c7d193f32edcb7bfad88892161225aeda64e9392 # v4.0.0
with:
name: SARIF file
path: results.sarif
- retention-days: 5
+ retention-days: 30
+ continue-on-error: true
- name: "Upload to code-scanning"
- uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
+ uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@232b83d754c938082c76ba7ca8bf9529ce4c7550 # v3.22.11
with:
sarif_file: results.sarif
+ continue-on-error: true🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the latest versions and SHAs of GitHub Actions
# Function to get latest release SHA
get_latest_sha() {
local repo=$1
local tag=$2
gh api repos/$repo/git/refs/tags/$tag | jq -r .object.sha
}
# Check actions/checkout
echo "actions/checkout latest SHA:"
get_latest_sha "actions/checkout" "v4.1.0"
# Check ossf/scorecard-action
echo "ossf/scorecard-action latest SHA:"
get_latest_sha "ossf/scorecard-action" "v2.4.0"
# Check actions/upload-artifact
echo "actions/upload-artifact latest SHA:"
get_latest_sha "actions/upload-artifact" "v4.0.0"
# Check github/codeql-action
echo "github/codeql-action latest SHA:"
get_latest_sha "github/codeql-action" "v3.22.11"
Length of output: 1169
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml
Outdated
| push: | ||
| paths-ignore: | ||
| - .codecov/** | ||
| - .docfx/** | ||
| - .nuget/** | ||
| - '**/*.md' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maintain consistency between event triggers
The paths-ignore patterns differ between push and pull_request events. Specifically, .github/** is present in pull_request but missing from push.
This inconsistency could lead to different pipeline behavior between push and PR events.
Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
push:
paths-ignore:
- .codecov/**
- .docfx/**
+ - .github/**
- .nuget/**
- '**/*.md'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| push: | |
| paths-ignore: | |
| - .codecov/** | |
| - .docfx/** | |
| - .nuget/** | |
| - '**/*.md' | |
| push: | |
| paths-ignore: | |
| - .codecov/** | |
| - .docfx/** | |
| - .github/** | |
| - .nuget/** | |
| - '**/*.md' |
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml
Outdated
| - .codecov/** | ||
| - .docfx/** | ||
| - .github/** | ||
| - .nuget/** | ||
| - '**/*.md' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Ignoring .github directory is a security risk - needs modification
The verification reveals that .github/** contains critical security files that should not be ignored:
dependabot.ymlfor automated dependency updatesscorecard.ymlfor supply-chain security checksworkflows/containing CI/CD configurations
While the scorecard.yml workflow runs independently on push to main, changes to these security-critical files in PRs should trigger the main pipeline for proper review. Recommend:
- Remove
.github/**from paths-ignore - If needed, explicitly ignore only non-critical paths like
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/**
🔗 Analysis chain
Review security implications of ignoring .github directory
While the glob patterns are more specific now, ignoring the entire .github/** directory means that changes to workflow files won't trigger the pipeline. This could potentially bypass security checks for workflow modifications.
Consider either:
- Removing
.github/**from paths-ignore, or - Being more specific about which .github subdirectories to ignore (e.g.,
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/**)
Let's check what security-critical files might be in the .github directory:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all files in .github directory to assess security impact
fd . .github -t f
Length of output: 177
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of dependabot.yml and scorecard.yml to understand security implications
echo "=== dependabot.yml ==="
cat .github/dependabot.yml
echo -e "\n=== scorecard.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/scorecard.yml
echo -e "\n=== Current pipeline triggers ==="
# Check if there are other workflow files that might handle .github changes
rg "on:" .github/workflows/ -A 5
Length of output: 8045
|
This pull request includes several changes to improve the CI/CD pipeline and enhance security measures. The updates include modifications to the GitHub Actions workflows and an addition to the
README.mdfile.CI/CD Pipeline Improvements:
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml: Updated thepaths-ignorepatterns to use more specific glob patterns and added apushevent trigger with the same ignore patterns.Security Enhancements:
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml: Added a new workflow for Scorecard supply-chain security analysis, including scheduled runs and artifact uploads.Documentation Update:
README.md: Added a new badge for OpenSSF Scorecard to the list of project badges.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation