Skip to content

Conversation

@kylecarbs
Copy link
Member

This allows a host override, which is useful for running Docker
containers that need to access the same deployment port, but on
host.docker.internal as the hostname.

It also removes access port, which was released a few days ago in hopes of
solving the same problem, but never really did. It doesn't seem likely to
be used yet, so it feels safe to remove.

kylecarbs and others added 2 commits August 18, 2022 10:17
This allows a host override, which is useful for running Docker
containers that need to access the same deployment port, but on
`host.docker.internal` as the hostname.

It also removes access port, which was released a few days ago in hopes of
solving the same problem, but never really did. It doesn't seem likely to
be used yet, so it feels safe to remove.
Signed-off-by: Spike Curtis <spike@coder.com>
@kylecarbs kylecarbs requested a review from spikecurtis August 18, 2022 20:40
@kylecarbs kylecarbs self-assigned this Aug 18, 2022
@kylecarbs kylecarbs merged commit 7172f9c into main Aug 18, 2022
@kylecarbs kylecarbs deleted the fixport branch August 18, 2022 20:53
DanielleMaywood pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2024
* fix: Add custom host for access URL and remove access port

This allows a host override, which is useful for running Docker
containers that need to access the same deployment port, but on
`host.docker.internal` as the hostname.

It also removes access port, which was released a few days ago in hopes of
solving the same problem, but never really did. It doesn't seem likely to
be used yet, so it feels safe to remove.

* Fix access url when host is not provided

Signed-off-by: Spike Curtis <spike@coder.com>

Signed-off-by: Spike Curtis <spike@coder.com>
Co-authored-by: Spike Curtis <spike@coder.com>
Co-authored-by: Spike Curtis <spike@spikecurtis.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants