-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Update package.json #17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
CodeAnt AI is reviewing your PR. Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing. Share on X · |
Summary of ChangesHello @ayushjrathod-dd, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request updates the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughThree stray keys ( Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 Biome (2.1.2)packages/eslint-plugin-query/package.json[error] 18-19: Property key must be double quoted (parse) [error] 20-20: expected Remove II (parse) [error] 21-21: expected Remove dfsgfs (parse) Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Update package.jsonTL;DR: Adds invalid content "dfsgfs" to the scripts section of eslint-plugin-query package.json Refacto PR SummaryIntroduces malformed content to the package.json scripts configuration in the eslint-plugin-query package. Change HighlightsClick to expand
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant D as Developer
participant NPM as NPM/Yarn
participant P as package.json
participant E as Error Handler
D->>NPM: npm install or npm run
NPM->>P: Parse package.json
P-->>NPM: Invalid JSON structure
NPM->>E: Syntax error
E-->>D: Package parsing failed
Testing GuideClick to expand
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces an invalid change into packages/eslint-plugin-query/package.json. The addition of dfsgfs inside the scripts object breaks the JSON syntax, which is a critical issue that will prevent the package from being used. This seems to be an accidental change and must be reverted.
|
|
||
|
|
||
| dfsgfs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
CodeAnt AI finished reviewing your PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/eslint-plugin-query/package.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
packages/eslint-plugin-query/package.json
[error] 20-20: Property key must be double quoted
(parse)
🪛 GitHub Actions: autofix.ci
packages/eslint-plugin-query/package.json
[error] 1-1: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile failed due to JSON parse error: ERR_PNPM_JSON_PARSE Expected property name or '}' in JSON at position 476 (line 20 column 5) while parsing '{ "name": "@tanstack/eslint-plugin-que' in /home/runner/work/query/query/packages/eslint-plugin-query/package.json
🪛 GitHub Actions: pr
packages/eslint-plugin-query/package.json
[error] 20-20: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile failed due to invalid JSON in package.json: ERR_PNPM_JSON_PARSE Expected property name or '}' in JSON at position 476
|
|
||
|
|
||
| dfsgfs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix critical JSON syntax error in package.json.
Lines 18–20 introduce invalid JSON that breaks npm script parsing and build pipelines. Specifically:
- Lines 18–19 are extraneous blank lines breaking the object structure
- Line 20 contains stray text ("dfsgfs") without proper JSON syntax (missing quotes and colon-value pair)
This has already caused pipeline failures: ERR_PNPM_JSON_PARSE Expected property name or '}' in JSON at position 476 (line 20 column 5).
Remove the stray content entirely:
"scripts": {
-
-
- dfsgfs
"clean": "premove ./dist ./coverage ./dist-ts",🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
[error] 20-20: Property key must be double quoted
(parse)
🪛 GitHub Actions: pr
[error] 20-20: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile failed due to invalid JSON in package.json: ERR_PNPM_JSON_PARSE Expected property name or '}' in JSON at position 476
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
packages/eslint-plugin-query/package.json lines 18–20 contain stray blank lines
and the invalid token "dfsgfs" which breaks JSON parsing; remove the extraneous
blank lines and the "dfsgfs" text (or replace it with a valid JSON key/value if
that content was intended), then ensure surrounding commas and braces are
syntactically correct and validate the file (e.g., with a JSON linter) so
npm/pnpm can parse it.
|
/refacto-visz |
|
Refacto is reviewing this PR. Please wait for the review comments to be posted. |
📁 Selected files for review (1)
🎯 Custom Instructions
|
|
No review comments were generated during this review iteration of the PR. |
|
/reacto-visz |
|
/refacto-visz |
2 similar comments
|
/refacto-visz |
|
/refacto-visz |
|
Refacto is reviewing this PR. Please wait for the review comments to be posted. |
Code Review: Configuration👍 Well Done
📁 Selected files for review (1)
🎯 Custom Instructions
📝 Additional Comments
|
| dd | ||
| dfsgfs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Incomplete Script Cleanup
Invalid tokens remain in scripts section after partial cleanup. The 'dd' addition and 'dfsgfs' string will cause JSON parsing failures and break all npm script execution for this package.
Standards
- ISO-IEC-25010-Reliability
- SRE-Error-Handling
- DbC-Preconditions
| dd | ||
| dfsgfs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Broken Script Configuration
Invalid script configuration blocks npm command execution causing CI pipeline failures and preventing local development builds. This configuration corruption will cause complete build system breakdown until resolved.
Standards
- ISO-IEC-25010-Performance-Resource-Utilization
- Algorithm-Opt-Build-Pipeline
| }, | ||
| "scripts": { | ||
|
|
||
| dd |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Invalid JSON Syntax
Invalid token 'dd' inserted into JSON structure breaks package.json parsing. This malformed JSON will cause npm install failures and prevent script execution across development and CI environments.
Standards
- Algorithm-Correctness-JSON-Parsing
- Business-Rule-Package-Validation
| dd | ||
| dfsgfs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Invalid JSON Structure
Stray tokens 'dd' and 'dfsgfs' corrupt the package.json scripts section, breaking npm command execution and blocking development workflows. This malformed JSON prevents script parsing and causes immediate build failures for team members.
Standards
- Clean-Code-Formatting
- Refactoring-Remove-Dead-Code
|
/refacto-visz |
|
Refacto is reviewing this PR. Please wait for the review comments to be posted. |
Code Review: Configuration👍 Well Done
📁 Selected files for review (1)
🎯 Custom Instructions
📝 Additional Comments
|
| dd | ||
| II | ||
| dfsgfs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Invalid JSON Structure
Invalid tokens inserted into package.json scripts section breaks JSON syntax. The strings 'dd', 'II', and 'dfsgfs' are not valid JSON properties, causing npm script parsing failures and blocking all package operations including clean, compile, and test commands.
"scripts": {
Commitable Suggestion
| dd | |
| II | |
| dfsgfs | |
| "scripts": { |
Standards
- Algorithm-Correctness-JSON-Parsing
- Business-Rule-Package-Configuration
| dd | ||
| II | ||
| dfsgfs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Corrupted JSON Configuration
Invalid JSON tokens in scripts section break npm command execution and CI pipeline functionality. Malformed configuration blocks all development workflows including builds, tests, and deployments for the eslint-plugin-query package.
"scripts": {
Commitable Suggestion
| dd | |
| II | |
| dfsgfs | |
| "scripts": { |
Standards
- Clean-Code-Configuration
- Refactoring-Remove-Dead-Code
CodeAnt-AI Description
Stray token inserted into package.json scripts breaks npm scripts
What Changed
Impact
✅ Failing package scripts for the eslint plugin✅ CI test and build failures for workflows invoking those scripts✅ Blocked local builds and tests for contributors💡 Usage Guide
Checking Your Pull Request
Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.
Talking to CodeAnt AI
Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:
This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.
Example
Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt
You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:
This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.
Example
Retrigger review
Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:
Check Your Repository Health
To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.
Summary by CodeRabbit