Final fixes

[LolaValente]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Reorganized LTI 1.3 Canvas integration guide into clearer sections, adding “Link Selection and Assignment Selection” and “Course Navigation and Editor Button.”
  • Added and updated visual guides for the new sections; removed several placeholder/example table blocks and an obsolete assignment-mapping section.
  • Replaced external reference with the official IMS Global LTI v1.3 specification link and clarified step guidance.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Restructured Canvas LTI 1.3 integration documentation with updated external links to IMS Global LTI v1.3 specification, revised step descriptions for clarity, introduced two new labeled sections with supporting images (Link/Assignment Selection and Course Navigation/Editor Button), removed prior list-table message type blocks, and eliminated the concluding mapping section.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)

Change Summary

Canvas LTI 1.3 Integration Documentation source/instructors/admin/integration/lti1-3Canvas.rst

Replaced cross-reference and URL block for LTI specification with formatted external link to IMS Global LTI v1.3; removed explicit deep-linking URL line; updated step 17 heading and description; introduced two new labeled sections with corresponding images (Link Selection and Assignment Selection; Course Navigation and Editor Button); removed prior list-table sections containing "Select Message Type" entries and several old image placements; removed concluding "Connecting/mapping assignments in Canvas" section

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• LTIUpdateandotherfixes #418: Restructures the same Canvas LTI doc (headings, links, and section content).
• LTI and DynReg Update #406: Removes and restructures mapping/connection content in the same LTI Canvas file.
• updated copy button and join course #407: Updates image directives and UI-related layout in the same documentation file.

Suggested reviewers

• shajason

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The pull request title "Final fixes" is vague and generic, using non-descriptive language that fails to convey meaningful information about the changeset. While the author may consider the documentation restructuring as final corrections, the title could apply to virtually any pull request containing updates or corrections. The actual changes—restructuring LTI 1.3 Canvas integration documentation, introducing new sections ("Link Selection and Assignment Selection" and "Course Navigation and Editor Button"), updating external references, and removing obsolete content blocks—are substantial and specific, but none of this is reflected in the title.	Consider updating the title to be more descriptive and specific, such as "Restructure LTI 1.3 Canvas integration documentation with new sections and updated references" or "Reorganize Canvas LTI documentation with link and course navigation sections." This would give reviewers and future maintainers a clear understanding of the primary changes when scanning commit history.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2924a09 and 4c05b77.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• source/instructors/admin/integration/lti1-3Canvas.rst (3 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

**/*.rst

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

**/*.rst: Review files for:

• Consistent formatting (e.g., headings, lists, links).
• Clear and concise language.
• Correct grammar and spelling.
• Proper use of rst syntax (e.g., avoid broken links or invalid code blocks).
• Adherence to style guides (e.g., consistent tone, terminology).
  Suggest improvements to enhance readability and accessibility.

Files:

• source/instructors/admin/integration/lti1-3Canvas.rst

🔇 Additional comments (3)

source/instructors/admin/integration/lti1-3Canvas.rst (3)

12-12: External link syntax and content look good.

The formatted link to the IMS Global specification is correctly structured with proper RST syntax (double underscores indicate an external link).

---

77-78: Instruction clarity is improved.

The expanded step 17 description now clearly conveys that each section has two steps and directs users to reference the image. The em dash is used appropriately, and the tone is consistent with the rest of the document.

---

80-81: Verify subsection titles accurately reflect their combined content.

The restructuring combines "Link Selection" with "Assignment Selection" into one section (line 80–81) and "Course Navigation" with "Editor Button" into another (lines 103–104). Confirm that grouping these placements together aligns with the configuration workflow and user expectations. If they are indeed always configured identically, the grouping makes sense; otherwise, consider whether separate subsections would improve clarity.

Also applies to: 103-104

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

source/instructors/admin/integration/lti1-3Canvas.rst (1)

80-85: Consider refining the alt text to reflect the broader scope of the section.

Line 84 provides alt text as "Canvas Link Selection placement," but the section is titled "Link Selection and Assignment Selection" (line 80), which encompasses two placement types. While "Link Selection placement" is not incorrect, the alt text could be more descriptive—for example, "Canvas Link Selection and Assignment Selection placements"—to fully reflect the section's purpose for users relying on screen readers.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c05b77 and 8b8e30f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• source/instructors/admin/integration/lti1-3Canvas.rst (3 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

**/*.rst

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

**/*.rst: Review files for:

• Consistent formatting (e.g., headings, lists, links).
• Clear and concise language.
• Correct grammar and spelling.
• Proper use of rst syntax (e.g., avoid broken links or invalid code blocks).
• Adherence to style guides (e.g., consistent tone, terminology).
  Suggest improvements to enhance readability and accessibility.

Files:

• source/instructors/admin/integration/lti1-3Canvas.rst

🔇 Additional comments (2)

source/instructors/admin/integration/lti1-3Canvas.rst (2)

107-109: Verify and correct the image filename—typo may prevent image rendering.

The filename canvascourseeditortselect.png on line 107 appears to contain a typo (extra 't' before 'select'). This was flagged in the previous review but remains unresolved. Confirm whether the file exists with this exact name; if not, correct it to canvascourseeditorselect.png to ensure the image renders properly.

The alt text on line 108 has been appropriately updated to match the section title—thank you for addressing that issue.

---

88-124: Clarify: Do different placement sections intentionally share identical endpoint URLs?

Both the "Link Selection and Assignment Selection" section (lines 88–100) and the "Course Navigation and Editor Button" section (lines 112–124) contain identical Target Link URI (https://apollo.codio.com/lti/resource_selection) and Icon URL values. If this is intentional because these placements share the same configuration, the documentation is correct. However, if each placement type should have distinct endpoints, please verify and update accordingly.