Feat/change prompt

[coditamar]

PR Type:

Documentation

---

PR Description:

This PR updates the instructions for the PR review prompt in the 'pr_description_prompts.toml' file. The changes include:

• Clarification on the interpretation of '+' lines in the PR diff code.
• Removal of a redundant 'extra_instructions' check.

---

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

• pr_agent/settings/pr_description_prompts.toml: Updated the instructions for PR review prompt. Clarified the interpretation of '+' lines in the PR diff code and removed a redundant 'extra_instructions' check.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis (updated)

• 🎯 Main theme: This PR primarily focuses on updating the instructions in the 'pr_description_prompts.toml' file.
• 📝 PR summary: The PR updates the instructions for the PR review prompt in the 'pr_description_prompts.toml' file. The changes include clarification on the interpretation of '+' lines in the PR diff code and the removal of a redundant 'extra_instructions' check.
• 📌 Type of PR: Documentation
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• Insights from user's answer: The user has confirmed that the main purpose of this PR is to update the instructions in the 'pr_description_prompts.toml' file. The user has clarified that the '+' lines in the PR diff code are the new lines that should be checked while considering the removed '-' lines.
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 1, as the PR is straightforward and involves changes to the documentation only.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are clearly explained. However, it would be beneficial to include a brief explanation of why these changes were necessary in the PR description. This would provide more context to the reviewers and other contributors.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: pr_agent/settings/pr_description_prompts.toml
    suggestion: Consider using a more explicit phrase instead of "Lines with '+' are the new code you should check while considering the removed lines '-'.". Something like "Lines starting with '+' indicate new code added in the PR, while lines starting with '-' indicate code that has been removed. Focus your review on the '+' lines, but also consider the impact of the '-' lines." [medium]
    relevant line: - Make sure not to focus the new PR code (the '+' lines). Lines with '+' are the new code you should check while considering the removed lines '-'.

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[coditamar]

/review

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Update PR review instructions
• 📝 PR summary: This PR updates the instructions for the PR review prompt in the 'pr_description_prompts.toml' file. The changes include clarification on the interpretation of '+' lines in the PR diff code and removal of a redundant 'extra_instructions' check.
• 📌 Type of PR: Documentation
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 1, because the PR only involves changes in the documentation and does not affect the functionality of the code.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR is straightforward and the changes made are clear. However, it would be beneficial to provide more context or reasoning behind the changes in the PR description.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: pr_agent/settings/pr_description_prompts.toml
    suggestion: It would be helpful to add an example of how to interpret '+' and '-' lines in the PR diff code. This can provide a clearer understanding for users who are not familiar with git diff syntax. [medium]
    relevant line: "+- Make sure not to focus the new PR code (the '+' lines). Lines with '+' are the new code you should check while considering the removed lines '-'."

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

[coditamar]

/review --pr_reviewer.inline_code_comments=true

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

Consider adding examples to illustrate the interpretation of '+' and '-' lines in the PR diff code. [medium]

[coditamar]

/review_and_reflect --pr_reviewer.inline_code_comments=true

[coditamar]

/reflect_and_review --pr_reviewer.inline_code_comments=true

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

Questions to better understand the PR:

1. Can you confirm that the main purpose of this PR is to update the instructions in the 'pr_description_prompts.toml' file?
2. The PR description mentions the removal of a redundant 'extra_instructions' check, but the diff does not seem to reflect this. Could you clarify where this change was made?
3. Could you explain the rationale behind the decision to clarify the interpretation of '+' lines in the PR diff code?

Please respond to the questions above in the following format:

/answer

1. ...
2. ...
   ...

[coditamar]

/answer

1. confirm
2. you are right
3. I want to make sure that the AI is focused on lines that were added

[coditamar]

/answer

1. confirm
2. you are right
3. I want to make sure that the AI is focused on lines that were added

[QodoAI-Agent]

Preparing PR description...

[QodoAI-Agent]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ No key issues to review