Skip to content

Conversation

@bnaul
Copy link
Contributor

@bnaul bnaul commented May 5, 2023

Fixes #45.

Followed the same pattern pointed out by @j-bennet here.

@bnaul
Copy link
Contributor Author

bnaul commented May 5, 2023

Oops let me re-push to my fork and re-open

@bnaul bnaul closed this May 5, 2023
@bnaul bnaul deleted the arrow_options branch May 5, 2023 14:54
@jrbourbeau
Copy link
Contributor

I think repo secrets are used here in CI, so PRing from a branch and not a fork is the right way to go 👍

@bnaul bnaul restored the arrow_options branch May 5, 2023 14:59
@bnaul
Copy link
Contributor Author

bnaul commented May 5, 2023

oh heh. well neither one is working right now, I thought maybe the error I was seeing was bc I didn't have the right permissions to create CI jobs on this repo but it seems to be something else....
image

@bnaul bnaul reopened this May 5, 2023
@jrbourbeau jrbourbeau mentioned this pull request May 5, 2023
@bnaul bnaul force-pushed the arrow_options branch from 172e7fe to a4bf625 Compare May 5, 2023 19:50
@bnaul bnaul force-pushed the arrow_options branch from a4bf625 to 2633fee Compare May 5, 2023 21:13
@bnaul
Copy link
Contributor Author

bnaul commented May 8, 2023

@j-bennet @jrbourbeau CI is happy now post-#48 if you would like to take a look 🙂

read_kwargs: dict
kwargs to pass to read_rows()
arrow_options: dict
kwargs to pass to record_batch.to_pandas() when converting from pyarrow to pandas
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good idea, added!

Copy link
Contributor

@j-bennet j-bennet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @bnaul.

@bnaul bnaul merged commit bab9e94 into main May 8, 2023
@bnaul bnaul deleted the arrow_options branch May 8, 2023 19:47
@bnaul bnaul mentioned this pull request May 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support configuring types_mapper in read_gbq

4 participants