-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
3.11.0 #577
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
3.11.0 #577
Conversation
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
|
@conda-forge-admin, rerender |
|
Looks like the downstreams tests are failing |
|
Upgrade to rc2? https://www.python.org/download/pre-releases/ |
| vc: # [win] | ||
| - 14.1 # [win] | ||
| MACOSX_SDK_VERSION: # [osx and x86_64] | ||
| - 11.0 # [osx and x86_64] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this intended? We can built it pretty nicely with 10.14 SDK on osx-64
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it's intended. Building with 10.14 will give you a python interpreter that's broken on 11.0. For eg: #575
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
However, using 11.0 doesn't build for intel 64 macos here. It was ok when building python 3.10.4 but not python 3.11. We're having a look at why, if you have any insights that would be great.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
However, using 11.0 doesn't build for intel 64 macos here.
I don't understand what you are saying here. Details please.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we use macOS SDK version 11.0, we can't build python 3.11 for the osx-64 target. (which is 64-bit intel CPU Mac). However, for previous versions of Python (we're on 3.10.4 at the moment), we successfully used SDK version 11.0 to build for all targets (both ARM and Intel mac).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the error when you use SDK 11.0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/var/folders/sy/f16zz6x50xz3113nwtb9bvq00000gp/T/abs_2092500kee/croots/recipe/python-split_1663247373378/work/Objects/longobject.c:5693:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'static_assert' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
The only change between a package that builds successfully, and one which fails with this message, is changing the SDK version from 10.14 to 11.0. This is when building Python v3.11 rc 1, for osx-64. When building the same feedstock for osx-arm64, using SDK version 11.0, the build completes successfully.
The static_assert call in question was added somewhere between Python v3.10.4 and v3.11.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That topic is also discussed quite extensively in python/cpython#91731
chrisburr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've made a 3.10 branch based on the current master and am about to re-target the existing PRs.
|
Guess the next step is starting a migration, added a draft PR ( conda-forge/conda-forge-pinning-feedstock#3573 ) to get this started. Feedback welcome 🙂 |
|
I've also updated |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.