Add JSON Schema Definitions for Core Conductor Models

[v1r3n]

Pull Request type

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• WHOSUSING.md
• Other (please describe):

Changes in this PR

Added important schemas that are useful for automations and LLMs

This PR introduces comprehensive JSON Schema definitions for Conductor's four core data models, enabling validation, documentation generation, IDE support, code generation, and AI/LLM integration.

The schemas for Workflow and Task will be useful for anyone wanting to build a validation system for Conductor as well as LLMs to understand the schemas for the critical models in Conductor for them to be able to generate and manage workflow.

Motivation

JSON Schemas provide a standardized, machine-readable way to describe Conductor's data models, enabling:

• Validation: Validate workflow and task definitions before submitting them to Conductor, catching errors early
• IDE Integration: Enable autocomplete, inline documentation, and real-time validation in VS Code, IntelliJ, and other IDEs
• Code Generation: Generate strongly-typed client libraries in various programming languages
• Documentation: Auto-generate API documentation from schemas
• AI/LLM Integration: Allow AI systems to understand Conductor's data structures for workflow generation and management
• Contract Testing: Ensure API responses conform to expected formats

Benefits for the Community

1. Faster Development: Developers get instant feedback while writing workflows
2. Fewer Errors: Catch configuration mistakes before runtime
3. Better Documentation: Self-documenting schemas with descriptions for every field
4. Tool Ecosystem: Enable building of validation tools, linters, formatters, and generators
5. AI Integration: Make Conductor more accessible to AI-powered automation tools

Version Info

• Schema version: 1.0
• Based on: Conductor 3.x
• Specification: JSON Schema Draft 07

[nthmost-orkes]

Can you give this a better description 😆

Since there's no associated issue describing what this PR is for, the PR should have more of a description of the motivation and utility of what's inside it.

If you don't mind.

(You can use Claude to do it, this is for humans and to set good examples here.)

[v1r3n]

Can you give this a better description 😆

Since there's no associated issue describing what this PR is for, the PR should have more of a description of the motivation and utility of what's inside it.

If you don't mind.

(You can use Claude to do it, this is for humans and to set good examples here.)

Added more notes.

[nthmost-orkes]

Nice, this will be useful. thanks for updating the description.