-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
fix(shim): rewrite cgroups v2 parsing logic #254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fff90b8
fix(shim): rewrite cgroups v2 parsing logic
Mossaka 7fe0325
fix: more gracefully handle multiple lines in the cgroups file
Mossaka 7972c9c
fix: make parse_cgroups_v2_path clearer
Mossaka 6e77318
cargo clippy
Mossaka 61e33b0
Update crates/shim/src/cgroup.rs
Mossaka File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there any concern about resolving symlinks or relative paths via canonicalize here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the go implementation the path is cleaned here https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/blob/1950892f69597aa844cbf000fbdf77610dda3a44/libcontainer/cgroups/fs2/defaultpath.go#L48
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Testing is harder if the actual path has to exist. Maybe we can just normalize it instead of canonicalizing it, although rust's stdlib doesnt have a normalize method, that would require a 3rd party crate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or do something like this:
https://github.com/containers/youki/blob/0b89e1d52089c8c328496dab02dcc2bcf5e1b53c/crates/libcontainer/src/utils.rs#L92
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand the Go's CleanPath correctly, it's like normalizing the path but without verifying it exists in the filesystem, unlick
fs::canonicalize()right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the key is:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Burning1020 @mxpv does this path need be cleaned? It is there in the go code but I am not sure if I completely understand why it is needed. If not we should be ok to merge this.