Any possibility of this being resurrected?

[Inaughenth]

I know this has been ignored for a couple of years and minecraft has moved on. However, this is something I think could be really interesting / useful.

I'd be happy to update the easy things, like the block id's & packet definitions for the communication protocol. But some of the other stuff is probably beyond my abilities right now, to be honest. So I hope that if I was able to do the repetitive stuff, you'd be able to update the rest rather quickly.

Cheers!

[crazy2be]

Sure, I'll see what I can do. It's crazy to think that I wrote this almost two years ago! Send me pull requests as you come up with them.

[Inaughenth]

Excellent! The first thing I did when I got the code was run fmt & fix on it. This left one compiler error:
./main.go:191: cannot use int64(amount * 1000 * 1000 * 1000) (type int64) as type time.Duration in function argument

I have not yet worked out the best way to resolve that, as far as I understand time.Duration should take an int64. Next up, I will add all the current blocks, then begin to add all the current packets in the protocol.

[crazy2be]

You may have to add an explicit cast to time.Duration (I.e. change the
argument to time.Duration(oldarg)).
On Oct 15, 2012 4:21 AM, "Inaughenth" notifications@github.com wrote:

Excellent! The first thing I did when I got the code was run fmt & fix on
it. This left one compiler error:
./main.go:191: cannot use int64(amount * 1000 * 1000 * 1000) (type int64)
as type time.Duration in function argument

I have not yet worked out the best way to resolve that, as far as I
understand time.Duration should take an int64. Next up, I will add all the
current blocks, then begin to add all the current packets in the protocol.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1#issuecomment-9437482.

[Inaughenth]

well... I'm not sure if I did this correctly but at least it compiles now. I'm not going to send you a pull request until I update a few of the protocol packets to current (so at least talks a little bit to the server). I am not sure which server you used when you first did this... but I've tried it as is with 1.1 and it didn't work.

Cheers!