Improve the e2tomoseg_convnet.py and make training faster#570
Open
ZhenHuangLab wants to merge 1 commit intocryoem:masterfrom
Open
Improve the e2tomoseg_convnet.py and make training faster#570ZhenHuangLab wants to merge 1 commit intocryoem:masterfrom
ZhenHuangLab wants to merge 1 commit intocryoem:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I found out that the
e2tomoseg_convnet.pycould be improved by usingmodel.fit. Training will be six times faster.For example, when I ran the following command:
time e2tomoseg_convnet_test.py --trainset=particles/GCB_001_bin6_SIRT_preproc__good_2_trainset.hdf --nettag=convnet_iter100 --learnrate=0.0001 --niter=100 --ncopy=1 --batch=16 --nkernel=40,40,1 --ksize=15,15,15 --poolsz=2,1,1 --trainout --training --device=gpuI could get the output as follows:
When using the
model.fit, the training will be much faster, and I can get almost the same results (like the loss, the network...)I can even set the
callbackparameter inmodel.fit()to set up some learning rate scheduler to improve the training process. So I think it is better to usemodel.fitinstead of the cycle ofmodel.train_on_batch.