Skip to content

Conversation

@siteshwar
Copy link
Member

... instead of "defect" in the reports.

Resolves: #193

@siteshwar siteshwar force-pushed the github-193 branch 2 times, most recently from 0275d0a to e2c24bb Compare July 25, 2024 13:30
... instead of "defect" in the reports.

Resolves: csutils#193

Signed-off-by: Siteshwar Vashisht <svashisht@redhat.com>
@siteshwar siteshwar marked this pull request as ready for review July 25, 2024 13:47
@kdudka kdudka self-requested a review July 25, 2024 13:53
Copy link
Member

@kdudka kdudka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I would also rename the newDefect CSS class to newFinding for consistency.

... to `newFinding` for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Siteshwar Vashisht <svashisht@redhat.com>
@siteshwar
Copy link
Member Author

siteshwar commented Jul 25, 2024

There is also the use of #def in the reports. Shall that be fixed too?

EDIT: My interpretation of #def used to be "definition" and not "defect", so we may skip it unless somebody objects.

@kdudka
Copy link
Member

kdudka commented Jul 25, 2024

Yep, I would keep #def to avoid unnecessary changes in URLs to scan results.

@siteshwar siteshwar merged commit e482bd7 into csutils:main Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Shall we use other term than "defects" in the reports?

2 participants