Skip to content

Conversation

@lodewiges
Copy link
Contributor

@lodewiges lodewiges commented Feb 20, 2025

fixes #428

The user archive job still failed due to restrictions in schema.rb so I. changed those to make an exception for the user with the id == 0. I also changed the model so when a form has been closed we can still archive the users response.

  • fix schema.rb

@lodewiges lodewiges marked this pull request as draft February 20, 2025 00:44
@lodewiges lodewiges changed the title Fix userArchiveJob Fix User_cleanup_Job Feb 20, 2025
@lodewiges lodewiges self-assigned this Feb 20, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.92%. Comparing base (488c3e8) to head (337a166).
Report is 1 commits behind head on staging.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging     #510   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.92%   99.92%           
========================================
  Files          203      203           
  Lines         2769     2769           
========================================
  Hits          2767     2767           
  Misses           2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lodewiges lodewiges marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 21:32
@lodewiges lodewiges enabled auto-merge March 3, 2025 22:34
@lodewiges lodewiges disabled auto-merge March 3, 2025 22:34
@lodewiges lodewiges merged commit 7f63d81 into staging Mar 3, 2025
1 check passed
@lodewiges lodewiges deleted the fix/userArchiveJob branch March 3, 2025 22:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

User_cleanup_Job doesn't run properly

2 participants