-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Fix #11438 MathLib error on user defined literals #5418
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
170e828
Fix #11438 MathLib error on user defined literals
chrchr-github f7f0250
Format
chrchr-github b2fd2d2
Don't handle non-standard literals
chrchr-github e1c2745
Adjust tests
chrchr-github 329d29b
Merge branch 'chr_Fix11438' of https://github.com/chrchr-github/cppch…
chrchr-github File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this logic might also exists in simplecpp. We need to keep that in sync or provide in function to get rid of the redundant code. I might be mistaken though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't see any code that is directly related.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
simplecpp::Token::flags()insimplecpp.h.There was talk about sharing this logic with some other dev but I guess that hasn't happened yet. Oops, the PR is actually still open: #4701. Also danmar/simplecpp#285.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see.
101010bwas also discussed in there. This is getting ugly.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ugh, that string-to-number stuff also plays into this. At least I got rid of the bogus calls and added a different conversion function but I haven't removed the code from the
MathLibconversion functions which does not apply to number literals yet.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm. It seems I didn't add anything which is not about number literals (my memory is a mess). If I did it must have been in #4611. But I don't think it make sense to review that.
We should simply get rid of code which makes invalid test cases pass.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you re-use any code from that other PR please credit Gerbo via
Co-authored-by:at the end of the commit message.