Skip to content

refactor: renamed amd64 to x86_64 in release#61

Merged
QuantumExplorer merged 1 commit into
v0.3-devfrom
refactor/rename_amd_x86_64
Nov 17, 2024
Merged

refactor: renamed amd64 to x86_64 in release#61
QuantumExplorer merged 1 commit into
v0.3-devfrom
refactor/rename_amd_x86_64

Conversation

@ogabrielides
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ogabrielides ogabrielides commented Nov 14, 2024

Addressed issue: #57

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated naming conventions for architecture identifiers in the release workflow, enhancing consistency across Linux and macOS platforms.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the workflow configuration for the "Release Dash Evo Tool" by standardizing architecture identifiers from "amd64" to "x86_64" across various job definitions for Linux and macOS. This includes updates to job matrix entries and platform specifications, ensuring consistency without altering the overall structure or functionality of the workflow. The job definitions for building and releasing the tool remain unchanged, and the Windows job continues to target "x86_64-pc-windows-gnu."

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/release.yml Renamed architecture identifiers from "amd64" to "x86_64" for Linux and macOS job definitions. Updated job matrix entries and platform specifications accordingly.

Possibly related PRs

  • release: provide zip for release #19: The changes in both PRs involve updates to the .github/workflows/release.yml file, specifically modifying platform identifiers from "amd64" to "x86_64" and enhancing the job matrix for various operating systems, indicating a direct connection in the workflow configuration.

Suggested reviewers

  • ktechmidas

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
We’ve changed some names, hip-hip-hooray!
From "amd64" to "x86_64,"
Our workflow's neat, we’ll code some more!
With hops of joy, we build and cheer,
For every change, a new frontier! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

Line range hint 150-180: Critical: Update artifact names in the release job to match the new x86_64 naming.

The release job is still trying to download and publish artifacts with the old "amd64" naming, but the build job is now uploading them with "x86_64" naming. This mismatch will cause the release job to fail.

Apply this diff to fix the artifact names:

       - name: Download Linux AMD64 Artifact
         uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
         with:
-          name: dash-evo-tool-amd64-linux.zip
+          name: dash-evo-tool-x86_64-linux.zip
       - name: Download MacOS AMD64 Artifact
         uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
         with:
-          name: dash-evo-tool-amd64-mac.zip
+          name: dash-evo-tool-x86_64-mac.zip

       - name: Publish release
         uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v1
         env:
           GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
         with:
           tag_name: ${{ github.event.inputs.tag }}
           files: |
-            ./dash-evo-tool-amd64-linux.zip
+            ./dash-evo-tool-x86_64-linux.zip
             ./dash-evo-tool-arm64-linux.zip
-            ./dash-evo-tool-amd64-mac.zip
+            ./dash-evo-tool-x86_64-mac.zip
             ./dash-evo-tool-arm64-mac.zip
             ./dash-evo-tool-windows.zip
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9648901 and 5254b8e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

28-31: LGTM! Architecture naming standardization looks good.

The renaming from "amd64" to "x86_64" in the matrix configuration follows industry standards while maintaining compatibility with the build system.

Also applies to: 36-40

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer changed the base branch from master to v0.3-dev November 17, 2024 03:55
@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer merged commit 4b99918 into v0.3-dev Nov 17, 2024
@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer deleted the refactor/rename_amd_x86_64 branch November 17, 2024 03:55
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants