refactor: Fix warnings from cppcheck#4625
Merged
Merged
Conversation
PastaPastaPasta
force-pushed
the
fix-stuff
branch
from
f767a33 to
ad220a4
Compare
PastaPastaPasta
force-pushed
the
fix-stuff
branch
from
ed21c6c to
13d0657
Compare
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
…hich may have desired side effects: 'IsClean'. [assertWithSideEffect]
src/llmq/quorums.cpp:635:37: warning: Either the condition 'pFrom==nullptr' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: pFrom. [nullPointerRedundantCheck] src/llmq/quorums.cpp:636:81: note: Assuming that condition 'pFrom==nullptr' is not redundant
…red ones.
ignored
```
"Consider using std::transform algorithm instead of a raw loop."
"Consider using std::accumulate algorithm instead of a raw loop."
```
cppcheck 2.6 is latest, however causes issues ``` src/spork.cpp:135:51: warning: Analysis failed. If the code is valid then please report this failure. [cppcheckError] ``` cppcheck 2.5 appears to get into an infinite loop
PastaPastaPasta
force-pushed
the
fix-stuff
branch
from
13d0657 to
b0e28e6
Compare
gades
pushed a commit
to cosanta/cosanta-core
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2023
* src/evo/evodb.cpp:57:29: warning: Assert statement calls a function which may have desired side effects: 'IsClean'. [assertWithSideEffect]
* src/llmq/quorums.cpp:635:37: note: Null pointer dereference
src/llmq/quorums.cpp:635:37: warning: Either the condition 'pFrom==nullptr' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: pFrom. [nullPointerRedundantCheck]
src/llmq/quorums.cpp:636:81: note: Assuming that condition 'pFrom==nullptr' is not redundant
* fix a bunch of cppcheck warnings
* cppcheck: run on many more files. Enable all checks except a few ignored ones.
ignored
```
"Consider using std::transform algorithm instead of a raw loop."
"Consider using std::accumulate algorithm instead of a raw loop."
```
* ci: build specific version of cppcheck instead of install from apt
* ci: use cppcheck 2.4, remove commented out line, fix symlink
cppcheck 2.6 is latest, however causes issues
```
src/spork.cpp:135:51: warning: Analysis failed. If the code is valid then please report this failure. [cppcheckError]
```
cppcheck 2.5 appears to get into an infinite loop
* no need to check presence before insertion
* use if-init, remove redundant check
* remove redundant check
* don't remove cmake? fix macOs depends build?
* cppcheck: one per line, alphabetize
* remove duplicate cmake install
gades
pushed a commit
to piratecash/pirate
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2023
* src/evo/evodb.cpp:57:29: warning: Assert statement calls a function which may have desired side effects: 'IsClean'. [assertWithSideEffect]
* src/llmq/quorums.cpp:635:37: note: Null pointer dereference
src/llmq/quorums.cpp:635:37: warning: Either the condition 'pFrom==nullptr' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: pFrom. [nullPointerRedundantCheck]
src/llmq/quorums.cpp:636:81: note: Assuming that condition 'pFrom==nullptr' is not redundant
* fix a bunch of cppcheck warnings
* cppcheck: run on many more files. Enable all checks except a few ignored ones.
ignored
```
"Consider using std::transform algorithm instead of a raw loop."
"Consider using std::accumulate algorithm instead of a raw loop."
```
* ci: build specific version of cppcheck instead of install from apt
* ci: use cppcheck 2.4, remove commented out line, fix symlink
cppcheck 2.6 is latest, however causes issues
```
src/spork.cpp:135:51: warning: Analysis failed. If the code is valid then please report this failure. [cppcheckError]
```
cppcheck 2.5 appears to get into an infinite loop
* no need to check presence before insertion
* use if-init, remove redundant check
* remove redundant check
* don't remove cmake? fix macOs depends build?
* cppcheck: one per line, alphabetize
* remove duplicate cmake install
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.