Skip to content

fix(rpc)!: require proTxHash to be unspecified when not asking for ENCRYPTED_CONTRIBUTIONS in quorum getdata rpc #5772

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
UdjinM6 wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

fix(rpc)!: require proTxHash to be unspecified when not asking for ENCRYPTED_CONTRIBUTIONS in quorum getdata rpc #5772

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ecfc325
rpc: require `proTxHash` to be unspecified when not asking for `ENCRY…
UdjinM6 Dec 17, 2023
703a783
doc: add partial release notes
UdjinM6 Dec 18, 2023
1db548f
test: expect `Should not specify proTxHash` error when flag is `0x01`
UdjinM6 Sep 23, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions doc/release-notes-5772.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
RPC changes
-----------

`quorum getdata` RPC will no longer allow `proTxHash` to be specified when `dataMask` is set to `1`.
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion src/rpc/quorums.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -813,8 +813,8 @@ static RPCHelpMan quorum_getdata()
uint16_t nDataMask = static_cast<uint16_t>(ParseInt32V(request.params[3], "dataMask"));
uint256 proTxHash;

// Check if request wants ENCRYPTED_CONTRIBUTIONS data
if (nDataMask & llmq::CQuorumDataRequest::ENCRYPTED_CONTRIBUTIONS) {
// Require proTxHash if request wants ENCRYPTED_CONTRIBUTIONS data
if (!request.params[4].isNull()) {
proTxHash = ParseHashV(request.params[4], "proTxHash");
if (proTxHash.IsNull()) {
Expand All @@ -823,6 +823,9 @@ static RPCHelpMan quorum_getdata()
} else {
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "proTxHash missing");
}
} else if (!request.params[4].isNull()) {
// Require no proTxHash otherwise
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Should not specify proTxHash");
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@knst knst Dec 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is it easy to make functional test for this case? 🤔

}

const auto quorum = llmq_ctx.qman->GetQuorum(llmqType, quorumHash);
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions test/functional/p2p_quorum_data.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -395,6 +395,8 @@ def test_watchquorums():

def test_rpc_quorum_getdata_protx_hash():
self.log.info("Test optional proTxHash of `quorum getdata`")
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Should not specify proTxHash",
mn1.get_node(self).quorum, "getdata", 0, 100, quorum_hash, 0x01, mn1.proTxHash)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "proTxHash missing",
mn1.get_node(self).quorum, "getdata", 0, 100, quorum_hash, 0x02)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "proTxHash invalid",
Expand Down
Loading