refactor: a bunch of trivial-ish headers improvements#6376
Merged
PastaPastaPasta merged 3 commits intoNov 12, 2024
Conversation
5 tasks
d99c14a to
047309f
Compare
2e73031 to
0c023f0
Compare
UdjinM6
reviewed
Nov 4, 2024
0c023f0 to
e9387ee
Compare
UdjinM6
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Split from #6375 and added some extra
What was done?
Tidy up headers of evo/ and llmq/:
How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit and functional tests
Compilation time in theory should be improved, in really it shaved just 2-5 seconds from 5 minutes by my benchmark.
Breaking Changes
N/A
Checklist: