Skip to content

docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md#6552

Merged
PastaPastaPasta merged 1 commit into
dashpay:developfrom
kwvg:secdoc_v22.1
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md#6552
PastaPastaPasta merged 1 commit into
dashpay:developfrom
kwvg:secdoc_v22.1

Conversation

@kwvg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@kwvg kwvg commented Feb 4, 2025

Additional Information

Updates the supported versions list in SECURITY.md

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code (note: N/A)
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas (note: N/A)
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests (note: N/A)
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@kwvg kwvg added this to the 23 milestone Feb 4, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the SECURITY.md file by modifying the supported versions table. Specifically, the entry for version 22 has been changed to 22.x, indicating that all minor versions within the 22 series are now supported. Versions below 22 remain marked as unsupported. This change clarifies the versioning policy by encompassing a broader range of versions under support.

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57026b3f370e88c6ac7c47dcd987490a6053bea8 and f8811df.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • SECURITY.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • SECURITY.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 modified the milestones: 23, 22.1 Feb 4, 2025
Comment thread SECURITY.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK f8811df

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit c880f82 into dashpay:develop Feb 4, 2025
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
f8811df docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)

Pull request description:

  ## Additional Information

  Updates the supported versions list in `SECURITY.md`

  ## Checklist:

  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK f8811df

Tree-SHA512: 3b10dd8ea49ea63d94b9a7df0cc95f5ae0d8fe8a6e8455d09478082bb397f63025953f2786e021730a4951763295c882b9b26a61ca691fccc44072c12da52072
PastaPastaPasta added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
e62b4eb Merge #6555: backport: Merge bitcoin#24263: doc: Fix gen-manpages, rewrite in Python (pasta)
53d0ff1 Merge #6552: docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (pasta)
4571d89 Merge #6554: docs: update man pages for 22.1 (pasta)
bc91a83 Merge #6553: chore: bump assume valid / checkpoints for v22.1 (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Backports from develop to 22.1

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK e62b4eb

Tree-SHA512: 9f88c1a77ec1adc453b023b764f91760e13064c86d109c29bb7856f2588c6450e518c9479f8c3e245f7eeaf5ef6d28aa85f00b4b5e94ef5a4d80cb5b3d7fdff2
PastaPastaPasta added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
774a018 chore: set release to true (pasta)
e62b4eb Merge #6555: backport: Merge bitcoin#24263: doc: Fix gen-manpages, rewrite in Python (pasta)
53d0ff1 Merge #6552: docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (pasta)
4571d89 Merge #6554: docs: update man pages for 22.1 (pasta)
bc91a83 Merge #6553: chore: bump assume valid / checkpoints for v22.1 (pasta)
c11ec40 docs: add release notes for 22.1.0 (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Manually suppressed configure.ac changes

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK fd51512
  kwvg:
    utACK fd51512

Tree-SHA512: 41f08e1879596c0dd339209f869f2e4c7497f275df1928154ed8dfd2df1ff66c0618792afbff8313a818ac4d14ed8aa04f00e0fa96468adcc494042a7a28cc2b
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants