Skip to content

chore: update docs of Network entries#499

Merged
xdustinface merged 1 commit into
v0.42-devfrom
chore/fix-network-docs
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

chore: update docs of Network entries#499
xdustinface merged 1 commit into
v0.42-devfrom
chore/fix-network-docs

Conversation

@xdustinface
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@xdustinface xdustinface commented Mar 7, 2026

Get rid of the "Bitcoin" and improve the others a bit.

Based on:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated internal documentation comments for improved code clarity.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 7, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 10f5c6df-fd47-4d0f-ba6f-0fa12bb28118

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 419df04 and 11c5fdb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • dash/src/network/constants.rs

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation comments for Network enum variants in the constants file have been updated. No functional changes, control flow modifications, or public signature alterations were made. The variant definitions remain identical.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Updates
dash/src/network/constants.rs
Updated documentation comments for Network enum variants without altering variant names, signatures, or behavior.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, hooray! The docs now gleam,
Network constants shine with commentary cream,
No code was changed, just words refined,
Clarity blooms for all to find!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: update docs of Network entries' accurately and clearly describes the main change—documentation updates to Network enum variants.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/fix-network-docs

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.84%. Comparing base (419df04) to head (11c5fdb).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on v0.42-dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           v0.42-dev     #499      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      63.09%   66.84%   +3.74%     
=============================================
  Files            313      313              
  Lines          64914    64944      +30     
=============================================
+ Hits           40955    43409    +2454     
+ Misses         23959    21535    -2424     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
core 74.93% <ø> (ø)
dash-network 74.92% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
dash-network-ffi 34.74% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
dash-spv 68.18% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
dash-spv-ffi 34.74% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
dashcore 74.92% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
dashcore-private 74.92% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
dashcore-rpc 19.92% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
dashcore-rpc-json 19.92% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
dashcore_hashes 74.92% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
ffi 35.98% <ø> (?)
key-wallet 65.58% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
key-wallet-ffi 34.74% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
key-wallet-manager 65.58% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 419df04
rpc 19.92% <ø> (ø)
spv 81.00% <ø> (?)
wallet 65.69% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
dash/src/network/constants.rs 87.43% <ø> (ø)

... and 54 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ZocoLini ZocoLini force-pushed the refactor/dash-network branch from 1ac4908 to 68e7a7d Compare March 9, 2026 15:40
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the merge-conflict The PR conflicts with the target branch. label Mar 9, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Mar 9, 2026

This PR has merge conflicts with the base branch. Please rebase or merge the base branch into your branch to resolve them.

@xdustinface xdustinface force-pushed the chore/fix-network-docs branch from b8a8fc5 to 11c5fdb Compare March 10, 2026 01:37
@xdustinface xdustinface changed the base branch from refactor/dash-network to v0.42-dev March 10, 2026 01:37
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the merge-conflict The PR conflicts with the target branch. label Mar 10, 2026
@xdustinface xdustinface marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2026 01:39
@xdustinface xdustinface reopened this Mar 10, 2026
@xdustinface xdustinface requested a review from ZocoLini March 10, 2026 01:46
@xdustinface xdustinface merged commit 8bca47d into v0.42-dev Mar 10, 2026
54 checks passed
@xdustinface xdustinface deleted the chore/fix-network-docs branch March 10, 2026 17:09
ZocoLini pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants