Skip to content

Conversation

@crusaderky
Copy link
Collaborator

#5983 (comment) adds a new method to SchedulerPlugin and concerns were raised about breaking potential duck-type plugins.

The existing documentation is ambiguous, as it may be interpreted that a partial duck-type is fine - it doesn't; if the plugin misses any methods it will fail.

@crusaderky crusaderky mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2022
3 tasks
@crusaderky crusaderky self-assigned this Mar 28, 2022
@sjperkins sjperkins self-requested a review March 28, 2022 12:30
Copy link
Member

@sjperkins sjperkins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results

       11 files  ±  0         11 suites  ±0   5h 58m 13s ⏱️ + 11m 49s
  2 673 tests ±  0    2 590 ✔️  -   1    83 💤 +  1  0 ±0 
14 479 runs  +20  13 703 ✔️ +33  776 💤  - 13  0 ±0 

Results for commit e1e6dff. ± Comparison against base commit 06170d5.

@crusaderky crusaderky merged commit 119021a into dask:main Mar 28, 2022
@crusaderky crusaderky deleted the scheduler_plugin branch March 28, 2022 14:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants