Release 0.8#4
Conversation
主要更改: - install.sh: 添加更多交互式确认提示(uninstall/删除重下载/git pull) - install.sh: Step 3 项目配置可选跳过 - ralph_reset.sh: 增加删除 root my_requirements.md、logs、src、tests、test-debug、.git 的选项 - planning.sh: 注释掉 ralph-enable 块 - 删除空的 init.sh - 修复 ralph-claude-code/install.sh 使用完整版 setup.sh
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 87bf891b7a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| if ! (cd "$PROJECT_DIR" && claude "$(cat <<'EOF' | ||
| 项目路径:$PROJECT_DIR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Allow PROJECT_DIR to expand in brainstorm prompt
The heredoc for the Step 1 prompt is now single‑quoted, so $PROJECT_DIR is passed literally to Claude rather than the actual path. That removes the only explicit project location from the prompt, which can cause the CLI to misinterpret which directory it should inspect when asked to “判断这是不是一个新项目.” If the path is needed for correct context, this regression will lead to incorrect project detection.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| if ! (cd "$PROJECT_DIR" && claude "$(cat <<'EOF' | ||
| 请使用 superpowers 的 /write-plan 功能调取最新生成的design.md生成待办清单。 | ||
| 设计文档路径:$LATEST_DESIGN_FILE |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Expand LATEST_DESIGN_FILE in /write-plan prompt
The Step 2 prompt is also using a single‑quoted heredoc, so $LATEST_DESIGN_FILE is not expanded. This means Claude receives a literal placeholder instead of the actual design.md path, which defeats the instruction to read the latest design file and can cause /write-plan to use the wrong (or no) input.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Merge v0.7 changes into 0.8 and prepare for main.