Skip to content

kernel-rolling: Sync Patches from linux-6.6.y #165

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
MingcongBai wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

kernel-rolling: Sync Patches from linux-6.6.y #165

MingcongBai wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

@MingcongBai
Copy link
Contributor

@MingcongBai MingcongBai commented May 21, 2024

Sync patches from the linux-6.6.y branch:

  • Include all vendor-submitted patches.
  • Exclude all upstream backports (i.e., Intel NPU backport from v6.9, etc.).

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin-ci-robot commented May 21, 2024

Hi @MingcongBai. Thanks for your PR. 😃

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin-ci-robot commented May 21, 2024

Hi @MingcongBai. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a deepin-community member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@MingcongBai MingcongBai changed the title Sync Patches from linux-6.6.y kernel-rolling: Sync Patches from linux-6.6.y May 21, 2024
@MingcongBai
Copy link
Contributor Author

MingcongBai commented May 21, 2024

Currently failing patches:

  • JM9100: Needs porting to gpu >= 6.7.
  • 2K0500 IPMI: Needs porting for ipmi_si_sim_setup.

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin-ci-robot commented May 22, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@MingcongBai
Copy link
Contributor Author

MingcongBai commented May 22, 2024

To handle in separate PRs, matching that of the original ones.

MingcongBai pushed a commit to MingcongBai/deepin-kernel that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
@chleroy @gregkh
powerpc/bpf/32: Fix failing test_bpf tests
0d5c132 
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ]

Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module
exhibits the following failures:

  test_bpf: deepin-community#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: deepin-community#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: deepin-community#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: deepin-community#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: deepin-community#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: deepin-community#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: deepin-community#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: deepin-community#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)
  test_bpf: deepin-community#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: deepin-community#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

  test_bpf: deepin-community#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 301 PASS
  test_bpf: deepin-community#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 555 PASS
  test_bpf: deepin-community#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 268 PASS
  test_bpf: deepin-community#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 269 PASS
  test_bpf: deepin-community#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 460 PASS
  test_bpf: deepin-community#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 320 PASS
  test_bpf: deepin-community#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 222 PASS
  test_bpf: deepin-community#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476
  eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
  jited:0 273 PASS

  test_bpf: deepin-community#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B
  eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 432 PASS
  test_bpf: deepin-community#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H
  eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 381 PASS
  test_bpf: deepin-community#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W
  eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported
  jited:0 505 PASS

  test_bpf: deepin-community#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1
  eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported
  jited:0 261 PASS

  test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed]

Fix them by adding missing processing.

Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Avenger-285714 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add a cgroup prog bpf_get_ns_current_pid_tgid() test
7334766 
[ Upstream commit 87ade6c ]

Add a cgroup bpf program test where the bpf program is running
in a pid namespace. The test is successfully:
  #165/3   ns_current_pid_tgid/new_ns_cgrp:OK

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240315184910.2976522-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Stable-dep-of: 21f0b0a ("selftests/bpf: Fix include of <sys/fcntl.h>")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@justforlxz justforlxz Awaiting requested review from justforlxz

@tsic404 tsic404 Awaiting requested review from tsic404

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

needs-ok-to-test

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MingcongBai @deepin-ci-robot