Skip to content

Conversation

@wojiaohanliyang
Copy link

If a large number of CMA memory are configured in system (for example, the CMA memory accounts for 50% of the system memory), starting a virtual machine with device passthrough, it will
call pin_user_pages_remote(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to pin memory. Normally if a page is present and in CMA area, pin_user_pages_remote() will migrate the page from CMA area to non-CMA area because of FOLL_LONGTERM flag. But the current code will cause the migration failure due to unexpected page refcounts, and eventually cause the virtual machine fail to start.

During CSV3 virtual machine startup, it will also call pin_user_pages_fast(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to pin shared memory in #NPF handler. If pin_user_pages_remote() and pin_user_pages_fast() pin a same page concurrently, it may lead to unexpected page refcounts.

To solve the problem above, we use mmap_write_lock/unlock() to serialize the execution of pin_user_pages_remote() and pin_user_pages_fast().

…m pin

hygon inclusion
category: bugfix
CVE: NA

---------------------------

If a large number of CMA memory are configured in system (for example,
the CMA memory accounts for 50% of the system memory), starting a
virtual machine with device passthrough, it will
call pin_user_pages_remote(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to pin memory.
Normally if a page is present and in CMA area, pin_user_pages_remote()
will migrate the page from CMA area to non-CMA area because of
FOLL_LONGTERM flag. But the current code will cause the migration
failure due to unexpected page refcounts, and eventually cause the
virtual machine fail to start.

During CSV3 virtual machine startup, it will also call
pin_user_pages_fast(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to pin shared memory
in #NPF handler. If pin_user_pages_remote() and pin_user_pages_fast()
pin a same page concurrently, it may lead to unexpected page refcounts.

To solve the problem above, we use mmap_write_lock/unlock() to serialize
the execution of pin_user_pages_remote() and pin_user_pages_fast().

Signed-off-by: yangge <yangge@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: hanliyang <hanliyang@hygon.cn>
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @wojiaohanliyang. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a deepin-community member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign matrix-wsk for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@opsiff
Copy link
Member

opsiff commented Nov 15, 2024

/lgtm

@opsiff opsiff merged commit cba34bd into deepin-community:linux-6.6.y Nov 15, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
Cryolitia pushed a commit to Cryolitia-Forks/kernel that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2025
commit b07996c upstream.

While enabling and disabling a BPF scheduler, every task is iterated a
couple times by walking scx_tasks. Except for one, all iterations keep
holding scx_tasks_lock. On multi-socket systems under heavy rq lock
contention and high number of threads, this can can lead to RCU and other
stalls.

The following is triggered on a 2 x AMD EPYC 7642 system (192 logical CPUs)
running `stress-ng --workload 150 --workload-threads 10` with >400k idle
threads and RCU stall period reduced to 5s:

  rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
  rcu:     91-...!: (10 ticks this GP) idle=0754/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=18204/18206 fqs=17
  rcu:     186-...!: (17 ticks this GP) idle=ec54/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=25863/25866 fqs=17
  rcu:     (detected by 80, t=10042 jiffies, g=89305, q=33 ncpus=192)
  Sending NMI from CPU 80 to CPUs 91:
  NMI backtrace for cpu 91
  CPU: 91 UID: 0 PID: 284038 Comm: sched_ext_ops_h Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-work-g6bf5681f7ee2-dirty deepin-community#471
  Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11DSi, BIOS 2.8 12/14/2023
  Sched_ext: simple (disabling+all)
  RIP: 0010:queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x17b/0x2f0
  Code: 02 c0 10 03 00 83 79 08 00 75 08 f3 90 83 79 08 00 74 f8 48 8b 11 48 85 d2 74 09 0f 0d 0a eb 0a 31 d2 eb 06 31 d2 eb 02 f3 90 <8b> 07 66 85 c0 75 f7 39 d8 75 0d be 01 00 00 00 89 d8 f0 0f b1 37
  RSP: 0018:ffffc9000fadfcb8 EFLAGS: 00000002
  RAX: 0000000001700001 RBX: 0000000001700000 RCX: ffff88bfcaaf10c0
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000101 RDI: ffff88bfca8f0080
  RBP: 0000000001700000 R08: 0000000000000090 R09: ffffffffffffffff
  R10: ffff88a74761b268 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88a6b6765460
  R13: ffffc9000fadfd60 R14: ffff88bfca8f0080 R15: ffff88bfcaac0000
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88bfcaac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f5c55f526a0 CR3: 0000000afd474000 CR4: 0000000000350eb0
  Call Trace:
   <NMI>
   </NMI>
   <TASK>
   do_raw_spin_lock+0x9c/0xb0
   task_rq_lock+0x50/0x190
   scx_task_iter_next_locked+0x157/0x170
   scx_ops_disable_workfn+0x2c2/0xbf0
   kthread_worker_fn+0x108/0x2a0
   kthread+0xeb/0x110
   ret_from_fork+0x36/0x40
   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
   </TASK>
  Sending NMI from CPU 80 to CPUs 186:
  NMI backtrace for cpu 186
  CPU: 186 UID: 0 PID: 51248 Comm: fish Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-work-g6bf5681f7ee2-dirty deepin-community#471

scx_task_iter can safely drop locks while iterating. Make
scx_task_iter_next() drop scx_tasks_lock every 32 iterations to avoid
stalls.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuchun Shang <xuchun.shang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cryolitia pushed a commit to Cryolitia-Forks/kernel that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
commit b07996c upstream.

While enabling and disabling a BPF scheduler, every task is iterated a
couple times by walking scx_tasks. Except for one, all iterations keep
holding scx_tasks_lock. On multi-socket systems under heavy rq lock
contention and high number of threads, this can can lead to RCU and other
stalls.

The following is triggered on a 2 x AMD EPYC 7642 system (192 logical CPUs)
running `stress-ng --workload 150 --workload-threads 10` with >400k idle
threads and RCU stall period reduced to 5s:

  rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
  rcu:     91-...!: (10 ticks this GP) idle=0754/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=18204/18206 fqs=17
  rcu:     186-...!: (17 ticks this GP) idle=ec54/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=25863/25866 fqs=17
  rcu:     (detected by 80, t=10042 jiffies, g=89305, q=33 ncpus=192)
  Sending NMI from CPU 80 to CPUs 91:
  NMI backtrace for cpu 91
  CPU: 91 UID: 0 PID: 284038 Comm: sched_ext_ops_h Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-work-g6bf5681f7ee2-dirty deepin-community#471
  Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11DSi, BIOS 2.8 12/14/2023
  Sched_ext: simple (disabling+all)
  RIP: 0010:queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x17b/0x2f0
  Code: 02 c0 10 03 00 83 79 08 00 75 08 f3 90 83 79 08 00 74 f8 48 8b 11 48 85 d2 74 09 0f 0d 0a eb 0a 31 d2 eb 06 31 d2 eb 02 f3 90 <8b> 07 66 85 c0 75 f7 39 d8 75 0d be 01 00 00 00 89 d8 f0 0f b1 37
  RSP: 0018:ffffc9000fadfcb8 EFLAGS: 00000002
  RAX: 0000000001700001 RBX: 0000000001700000 RCX: ffff88bfcaaf10c0
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000101 RDI: ffff88bfca8f0080
  RBP: 0000000001700000 R08: 0000000000000090 R09: ffffffffffffffff
  R10: ffff88a74761b268 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88a6b6765460
  R13: ffffc9000fadfd60 R14: ffff88bfca8f0080 R15: ffff88bfcaac0000
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88bfcaac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f5c55f526a0 CR3: 0000000afd474000 CR4: 0000000000350eb0
  Call Trace:
   <NMI>
   </NMI>
   <TASK>
   do_raw_spin_lock+0x9c/0xb0
   task_rq_lock+0x50/0x190
   scx_task_iter_next_locked+0x157/0x170
   scx_ops_disable_workfn+0x2c2/0xbf0
   kthread_worker_fn+0x108/0x2a0
   kthread+0xeb/0x110
   ret_from_fork+0x36/0x40
   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
   </TASK>
  Sending NMI from CPU 80 to CPUs 186:
  NMI backtrace for cpu 186
  CPU: 186 UID: 0 PID: 51248 Comm: fish Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-work-g6bf5681f7ee2-dirty deepin-community#471

scx_task_iter can safely drop locks while iterating. Make
scx_task_iter_next() drop scx_tasks_lock every 32 iterations to avoid
stalls.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuchun Shang <xuchun.shang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cryolitia pushed a commit to Cryolitia-Forks/kernel that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
commit b07996c upstream.

While enabling and disabling a BPF scheduler, every task is iterated a
couple times by walking scx_tasks. Except for one, all iterations keep
holding scx_tasks_lock. On multi-socket systems under heavy rq lock
contention and high number of threads, this can can lead to RCU and other
stalls.

The following is triggered on a 2 x AMD EPYC 7642 system (192 logical CPUs)
running `stress-ng --workload 150 --workload-threads 10` with >400k idle
threads and RCU stall period reduced to 5s:

  rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
  rcu:     91-...!: (10 ticks this GP) idle=0754/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=18204/18206 fqs=17
  rcu:     186-...!: (17 ticks this GP) idle=ec54/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=25863/25866 fqs=17
  rcu:     (detected by 80, t=10042 jiffies, g=89305, q=33 ncpus=192)
  Sending NMI from CPU 80 to CPUs 91:
  NMI backtrace for cpu 91
  CPU: 91 UID: 0 PID: 284038 Comm: sched_ext_ops_h Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-work-g6bf5681f7ee2-dirty deepin-community#471
  Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11DSi, BIOS 2.8 12/14/2023
  Sched_ext: simple (disabling+all)
  RIP: 0010:queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x17b/0x2f0
  Code: 02 c0 10 03 00 83 79 08 00 75 08 f3 90 83 79 08 00 74 f8 48 8b 11 48 85 d2 74 09 0f 0d 0a eb 0a 31 d2 eb 06 31 d2 eb 02 f3 90 <8b> 07 66 85 c0 75 f7 39 d8 75 0d be 01 00 00 00 89 d8 f0 0f b1 37
  RSP: 0018:ffffc9000fadfcb8 EFLAGS: 00000002
  RAX: 0000000001700001 RBX: 0000000001700000 RCX: ffff88bfcaaf10c0
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000101 RDI: ffff88bfca8f0080
  RBP: 0000000001700000 R08: 0000000000000090 R09: ffffffffffffffff
  R10: ffff88a74761b268 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88a6b6765460
  R13: ffffc9000fadfd60 R14: ffff88bfca8f0080 R15: ffff88bfcaac0000
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88bfcaac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f5c55f526a0 CR3: 0000000afd474000 CR4: 0000000000350eb0
  Call Trace:
   <NMI>
   </NMI>
   <TASK>
   do_raw_spin_lock+0x9c/0xb0
   task_rq_lock+0x50/0x190
   scx_task_iter_next_locked+0x157/0x170
   scx_ops_disable_workfn+0x2c2/0xbf0
   kthread_worker_fn+0x108/0x2a0
   kthread+0xeb/0x110
   ret_from_fork+0x36/0x40
   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
   </TASK>
  Sending NMI from CPU 80 to CPUs 186:
  NMI backtrace for cpu 186
  CPU: 186 UID: 0 PID: 51248 Comm: fish Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-work-g6bf5681f7ee2-dirty deepin-community#471

scx_task_iter can safely drop locks while iterating. Make
scx_task_iter_next() drop scx_tasks_lock every 32 iterations to avoid
stalls.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuchun Shang <xuchun.shang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cryolitia pushed a commit to Cryolitia-Forks/kernel that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
commit b07996c upstream.

While enabling and disabling a BPF scheduler, every task is iterated a
couple times by walking scx_tasks. Except for one, all iterations keep
holding scx_tasks_lock. On multi-socket systems under heavy rq lock
contention and high number of threads, this can can lead to RCU and other
stalls.

The following is triggered on a 2 x AMD EPYC 7642 system (192 logical CPUs)
running `stress-ng --workload 150 --workload-threads 10` with >400k idle
threads and RCU stall period reduced to 5s:

  rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
  rcu:     91-...!: (10 ticks this GP) idle=0754/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=18204/18206 fqs=17
  rcu:     186-...!: (17 ticks this GP) idle=ec54/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=25863/25866 fqs=17
  rcu:     (detected by 80, t=10042 jiffies, g=89305, q=33 ncpus=192)
  Sending NMI from CPU 80 to CPUs 91:
  NMI backtrace for cpu 91
  CPU: 91 UID: 0 PID: 284038 Comm: sched_ext_ops_h Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-work-g6bf5681f7ee2-dirty deepin-community#471
  Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11DSi, BIOS 2.8 12/14/2023
  Sched_ext: simple (disabling+all)
  RIP: 0010:queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x17b/0x2f0
  Code: 02 c0 10 03 00 83 79 08 00 75 08 f3 90 83 79 08 00 74 f8 48 8b 11 48 85 d2 74 09 0f 0d 0a eb 0a 31 d2 eb 06 31 d2 eb 02 f3 90 <8b> 07 66 85 c0 75 f7 39 d8 75 0d be 01 00 00 00 89 d8 f0 0f b1 37
  RSP: 0018:ffffc9000fadfcb8 EFLAGS: 00000002
  RAX: 0000000001700001 RBX: 0000000001700000 RCX: ffff88bfcaaf10c0
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000101 RDI: ffff88bfca8f0080
  RBP: 0000000001700000 R08: 0000000000000090 R09: ffffffffffffffff
  R10: ffff88a74761b268 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88a6b6765460
  R13: ffffc9000fadfd60 R14: ffff88bfca8f0080 R15: ffff88bfcaac0000
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88bfcaac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f5c55f526a0 CR3: 0000000afd474000 CR4: 0000000000350eb0
  Call Trace:
   <NMI>
   </NMI>
   <TASK>
   do_raw_spin_lock+0x9c/0xb0
   task_rq_lock+0x50/0x190
   scx_task_iter_next_locked+0x157/0x170
   scx_ops_disable_workfn+0x2c2/0xbf0
   kthread_worker_fn+0x108/0x2a0
   kthread+0xeb/0x110
   ret_from_fork+0x36/0x40
   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
   </TASK>
  Sending NMI from CPU 80 to CPUs 186:
  NMI backtrace for cpu 186
  CPU: 186 UID: 0 PID: 51248 Comm: fish Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-work-g6bf5681f7ee2-dirty deepin-community#471

scx_task_iter can safely drop locks while iterating. Make
scx_task_iter_next() drop scx_tasks_lock every 32 iterations to avoid
stalls.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuchun Shang <xuchun.shang@linux.alibaba.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants