GPU-LCAO example has misleading comments

[QuantumMisaka]

Describe the Code Quality Issue

In examples/36_gpu/si16_lcao/INPUT :

INPUT_PARAMETERS
#Parameters (1.General)
suffix			autotest
calculation     scf
device          gpu
gamma_only      1  # GPU acceleration currently only support gamma_only set to 1. ### Abacus will generate/overwrite a KPT file when gamma_only is set to 1.
ks_solver		cusolver  # if not set, the default ks_solver is cusolver,
                          # you can also choose genelpa or scalapack_gvx.

#nbands			8
symmetry		1

#Parameters (2.Iteration)
ecutwfc			100 ###Energy cutoff needs to be tested to ensure your calculation is reliable.[1]
scf_thr		    1e-6
scf_nmax		100
cal_force       1
cal_stress      1

#Parameters (3.Basis)
basis_type		lcao

#Parameters (4.Smearing)
smearing_method		gauss
smearing_sigma		0.002

#Parameters (5.Mixing)
mixing_type		broyden
mixing_beta		0.3


### [1] Energy cutoff determines the quality of numerical quadratures in your calculations.
###     So it is strongly recommended to test whether your result (such as converged SCF energies) is
###     converged with respect to the energy cutoff.

But LCAO-GPU support multi k-points calculation, and also ks_solver should be one of cusolver, cusovlermp and elpa

Additional Context

No response

Task list for Issue attackers (only for developers)

• Identify the specific code file or section with the code quality issue.
• Investigate the issue and determine the root cause.
• Research best practices and potential solutions for the identified issue.
• Refactor the code to improve code quality, following the suggested solution.
• Ensure the refactored code adheres to the project's coding standards.
• Test the refactored code to ensure it functions as expected.
• Update any relevant documentation, if necessary.
• Submit a pull request with the refactored code and a description of the changes made.