Skip to content

assign energy shift stats if atomic energies are assigned#1477

Merged
wanghan-iapcm merged 5 commits intodeepmodeling:develfrom
njzjz:atom_ener_stat
Feb 16, 2022
Merged

assign energy shift stats if atomic energies are assigned#1477
wanghan-iapcm merged 5 commits intodeepmodeling:develfrom
njzjz:atom_ener_stat

Conversation

@njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Feb 15, 2022

Atomic energies stats may be incorrect. Here, we use assigned atomic energies instead.
I am training a model against multiple systems, where some atoms should not contribute energies. Before this commit, the loss of my model could not decrease. After this commit, it decreased quickly.

Atomic energies stats may be incorrect. Here, we use assigned atomic energies instead.
I am training a model against multiple systems, where some atoms should not contribute energies. Before this commit, the loss of my model could not decrease. After this commit, it decreased quickly.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 15, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1477 (352a861) into devel (82c787d) will increase coverage by 0.33%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #1477      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.68%   76.01%   +0.33%     
==========================================
  Files          92       92              
  Lines        7671     7681      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         5806     5839      +33     
+ Misses       1865     1842      -23     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
deepmd/fit/ener.py 92.54% <100.00%> (+1.63%) ⬆️
deepmd/descriptor/se_a.py 94.82% <0.00%> (+0.64%) ⬆️
deepmd/train/trainer.py 74.53% <0.00%> (+2.08%) ⬆️
deepmd/utils/network.py 92.63% <0.00%> (+9.83%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 82c787d...352a861. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please add a UT for your update?
For example you may provide 1 atom_ener for a three component system, and see if the computed energy_shift exactly use the assigned atom_ener and fits the other two element from the data.
(I hope I understood your PR correctly..)

@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as draft February 15, 2022 16:52
@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as ready for review February 15, 2022 19:21
@njzjz njzjz requested a review from wanghan-iapcm February 15, 2022 19:22
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm merged commit b26ef18 into deepmodeling:devel Feb 16, 2022
@njzjz njzjz deleted the atom_ener_stat branch February 17, 2022 05:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants