Conversation
devleejb
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2024
devleejb
deleted the
25-migrate-code-from-python-to-rust-for-improved-performance-and-dependency-management-in-cli-tool
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?:
enhancement
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR involves migrating the existing Python codebase to Rust to improve overall performance and enhance dependency management within the CLI tool. By transitioning to Rust, we aim to leverage its efficiency and robustness to optimize the tool's functionality.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #25
Special notes for your reviewer:
The decision to migrate from Python to Rust was driven by the need to address performance bottlenecks and streamline dependency management in the CLI tool. Rust's performance capabilities and modern tooling make it an ideal choice for this migration, ensuring a more stable and efficient tool operation.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation: