Skip to content

Conversation

@JslYoon
Copy link

@JslYoon JslYoon commented Aug 4, 2025

…ng policies

What does this PR do?

Updating go version form 1.21 to 1.24

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

devfile/api#1708

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from elsony and thepetk August 4, 2025 21:01
@JslYoon JslYoon self-assigned this Aug 4, 2025
@JslYoon JslYoon force-pushed the JslYoon/UpdateGo1.24 branch from 65c625f to 4c30850 Compare August 6, 2025 18:57
Copy link
Contributor

@thepetk thepetk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking at this one and the failing tests, I'm just thinking is it even a requirement to run 4.11 to 4.15 tests anymore?

cc @michael-valdron wdyt?

@JslYoon
Copy link
Author

JslYoon commented Aug 7, 2025

looking at this one and the failing tests, I'm just thinking is it even a requirement to run 4.11 to 4.15 tests anymore?

cc @michael-valdron wdyt?

Yeah, looks like its something to do with the base image go version, so we'd have to change the base image?

…ng policies

Signed-off-by: Lucas Yoon <lyoon@lyoon-thinkpadp1gen7.boston.csb>
@JslYoon
Copy link
Author

JslYoon commented Aug 20, 2025

/retest

@michael-valdron
Copy link
Member

looking at this one and the failing tests, I'm just thinking is it even a requirement to run 4.11 to 4.15 tests anymore?

cc @michael-valdron wdyt?

@thepetk @JslYoon These are quite old yeah, I'd recommend changing the target OCP versions here to v4.16, v4.17, v4.18.

@michael-valdron
Copy link
Member

/test all

@michael-valdron
Copy link
Member

@johnmcollier We'll need to switch the required checks to the new checks here.

@JslYoon
Copy link
Author

JslYoon commented Aug 27, 2025

/retest

1 similar comment
@michael-valdron
Copy link
Member

/retest

@JslYoon
Copy link
Author

JslYoon commented Sep 1, 2025

/retest

@JslYoon JslYoon force-pushed the JslYoon/UpdateGo1.24 branch 2 times, most recently from 5e78cf3 to ef41785 Compare September 2, 2025 17:20
Copy link
Member

@michael-valdron michael-valdron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JslYoon Nice job, console testing is now passing!

Aside from my nit comment, I'll take a look at the odo piece before approving, I believe this check will need to be force merged.

Signed-off-by: Lucas Yoon <lyoon@lyoon-thinkpadp1gen7.boston.csb>
@JslYoon JslYoon force-pushed the JslYoon/UpdateGo1.24 branch from ef41785 to dfdece6 Compare September 2, 2025 17:46
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 2, 2025

@JslYoon: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/v4.12.odo-images bb42a0b link true /test v4.12.odo-images
ci/prow/v4.15.odo-images bb42a0b link true /test v4.15.odo-images
ci/prow/v4.11.odo-images bb42a0b link true /test v4.11.odo-images
ci/prow/v4.15.console-images bb42a0b link true /test v4.15.console-images
ci/prow/v4.12.console-images bb42a0b link true /test v4.12.console-images
ci/prow/v4.11.console-images bb42a0b link true /test v4.11.console-images
ci/prow/v4.16.odo-images dfdece6 link true /test v4.16.odo-images
ci/prow/v4.17.odo-images dfdece6 link true /test v4.17.odo-images
ci/prow/v4.18.odo-images dfdece6 link true /test v4.18.odo-images

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@michael-valdron michael-valdron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@johnmcollier It appears that the odo checks are checking out from main rather than the PR branch, we'll need to force merge to get past this, are you still able to do this?

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 2, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JslYoon, michael-valdron

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Sep 2, 2025
@johnmcollier johnmcollier merged commit 3a4877c into main Sep 4, 2025
6 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants