Skip to content

Conversation

@AnshSinghSonkhia
Copy link
Contributor

Double check these details before you open a PR

  • PR does not match another non-stale PR currently opened
  • PR name matches the format new icon: Icon name (versions separated by comma). More details here
  • PR's base is the develop branch.
  • Your icons are inside a folder as seen here
  • SVG matches the standards laid out here
  • A new object is added in the devicon.json file as seen here

This PR fixes #2158

Link to prove your SVG is correct and up-to-date.

Home page: https://glitch.me/
Icon (on Simple Icons): https://simpleicons.org/icons/glitch.svg

SVGs

plain-svg original-svg

@Kaamkiya
Copy link

Kaamkiya commented Mar 9, 2024

Thanks for fixing my issue :)

@AnshSinghSonkhia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for fixing my issue :)

@Kaamkiya Thanks for raising it, I'm glad to help you :)

@Snailedlt Snailedlt added the feature:icon PR when a new icon is ready to be added to the collection label Jul 1, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hi!

I'm the check-bot and we have some issues with your PR:

devicon.json is not sorted correctly.
Please make sure that your icon is added in the `devicon.json` file at the correct alphabetic position
as seen here: https://github.com/devicons/devicon/wiki/Updating-%60devicon.json%60


Check our CONTRIBUTING guide for more details regarding these errors.

Please address these issues. When you update this PR, I will check your SVGs again.

Thanks for your help,
SVG-Checker Bot 😄

@canaleal canaleal dismissed their stale review February 23, 2025 06:41

Issues resolved

@canaleal canaleal merged commit c2f7a46 into devicons:develop Feb 23, 2025
5 checks passed
@canaleal canaleal mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feature:icon PR when a new icon is ready to be added to the collection

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants