Skip to content

docs(nap): add archiveDecisions() contract comment#59

Closed
diberry wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
squad/37-nap-jsdoc
Closed

docs(nap): add archiveDecisions() contract comment#59
diberry wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
squad/37-nap-jsdoc

Conversation

@diberry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@diberry diberry commented Mar 27, 2026

Minimal JSDoc contract for archiveDecisions() documenting entry format, invariants, thresholds, and return behavior.

Closes #37

Co-authored-by: Copilot 223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@diberry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

diberry commented Mar 27, 2026

✅ APPROVED

Minimal and correct:

  • Single commit: docs(nap): add archiveDecisions() contract comment
  • Only JSDoc comment added to archiveDecisions() in nap.ts (lines 311-336)
  • No code changes, no unrelated files
  • Comment accurately documents the function's contract, invariants, threshold behavior, and archival strategy

All criteria met for issue #37.

@diberry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

diberry commented Mar 27, 2026

APPROVED

Quality gate verification for PR #59 (docs(nap): add archiveDecisions() contract comment):

  • ✅ Exactly 1 commit on branch (squad/37-nap-jsdoc)
  • ✅ Only 3 files changed (expected scribe charter + template + nap.ts)
  • ✅ Comment-only change to nap.ts — zero functional changes
  • ✅ JSDoc contract for \�rchiveDecisions()\ is thorough (invariants, threshold, strategy, parameters, return value all documented)
  • ✅ No junk files

Ready to merge.

@diberry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

diberry commented Mar 27, 2026

Retargeted to bradygaster#648

@diberry diberry closed this Mar 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants