Add CI compilation with clang++-3.8#4718
Conversation
|
@kroening @romainbrenguier @peterschrammel Could this be moved into a new CodeBuild job instead to be properly run in parallel? |
Yes, please move that into a new |
|
@peterschrammel @tautschnig I added a new buildspec-linux-clang-3.8.yml file but it looks like only buildspec.yml and buildspec-windows.yml are run on CI |
I'll add that to codebuild |
ef13e99 to
7b1280f
Compare
allredj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 7b1280f).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/113845577
872198f to
88abf60
Compare
allredj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PR failed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 872198f).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/113875367
Status will be re-evaluated on next push.
Common spurious failures include: the cbmc commit has disappeared in the mean time (e.g. in a force-push); the author is not in the list of contributors (e.g. first-time contributors); compatibility was already broken by an earlier merge.
allredj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 88abf60).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/113876083
allredj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 7ef487a).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/114072123
This uses CodeBuild to run in parallel
allredj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 45fc621).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/114079433
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #4718 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage ? 68.46%
==========================================
Files ? 1270
Lines ? 104777
Branches ? 0
==========================================
Hits ? 71740
Misses ? 33037
Partials ? 0Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This is to check that changes do not break compilation using
clang++-3.8, as happened with
#4699