Skip to content

Contribution standards and process #31

@sembrat

Description

@sembrat

I think it may be valuable to understand the code review, commit, and contribution process for DCC repo work.

For example:

  1. Do DCC members have a representative with write access for each organization?
  2. Who should review PRs?
  3. Who should merge and close PRs?

Selfishly, I'd love an example of how best to contribute to DCC repositories and projects and reach out to DCC folks for feedback, review, and next steps.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

spit shineEpic for improving documentation/communication

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done (Deployed/Closed)

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions