Parallelize word processing in suggest command#63
Open
snomos wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Use par_iter() instead of a sequential for-loop when processing words in the suggest command, matching the approach used in the accuracy command. This gives a significant speedup when processing large word lists via stdin.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use
par_iter()from Rayon instead of a sequential for-loop when processing words in thesuggestcommand, matching the approach already used in theaccuracycommand.This gives a significant speedup when processing large word lists via stdin, e.g.:
Changes:
rayona required (non-optional) dependency for the CLIrun()function to usepar_iter().map().collect()for parallel processingSend + Syncto allow sharing across threads