Conversation
|
Thanks for your pull request, @RazvanN7! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon. Some tips to help speed things up:
Bear in mind that large or tricky changes may require multiple rounds of review and revision. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information. Bugzilla referencesYour PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue. If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog. |
|
@andralex all the other true/false occurrences are highlighted with $D. Anyway, it's not important... |
|
Yah, most of the docs predate the introduction of the backticks feature. This gave me the idea of dlang/phobos#5801. |
|
|
||
| $(P Takes one argument. It returns `true` if the argument is a symbol | ||
| marked with the `@future` keyword, otherwise `false`. Currently, only | ||
| functions and variable declarations have support for the `@future` keyword.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's worth noting that this is an experimental feature. To the point that it's not even @future yet, but @__future (IIRC). Also, I think we should strongly state that this is not intended for user code yet, and link to the DIP.
I think this feature is having too much visibility and too little clarity for an experimental feature...
After [1] is merged and @future is documented, this addition should be the next step.
[1] dlang/dmd#7232