Clean up distributed license files#4010
Merged
yebblies merged 2 commits intodlang:masterfrom Sep 24, 2014
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
I'm good with this. |
src/win32.mak
Outdated
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Did a copy-pasto error here.
Contributor
|
You could just get rid of |
Member
Author
That would be a separate PR. :) |
Member
|
Being mentioned as author of ldfpu.asm, I'm fine with relicensing it under boost. |
Member
Author
|
@yebblies - PR raised. |
Contributor
|
I approve. |
Member
Member
Author
|
Fixed conflicts. |
Contributor
|
Auto-merge toggled on |
yebblies
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2014
Clean up distributed license files
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Noticed that the gpl.txt and artistic.txt files were still being distributed long after the switch to boost.
There are some remaining files that are still dual gpl/artistic licensed, so the first commit is re-licensing them as boost - so only @WalterBright or the original authors (@rainers @dheld) can sign these off.
The second commit is removing the gpl.txt and artistic.txt licenses, updating the readme.txt, and adding a new boostlicense.txt file which is included in the
install-copymake rule, which I assume is used for creating release tarballs/zips.