fix Issue 17499 - with -betterC switch, call C's assert failure function rather than druntime's#6901
Merged
dlang-bot merged 1 commit intodlang:masterfrom Jun 18, 2017
Merged
Conversation
8150d90 to
0bb9d9e
Compare
0bb9d9e to
d11482c
Compare
Member
|
Makes sense. I have bigger plans for assert, but this doesn't stand in their ways. |
Contributor
|
(closing and reopening to rekick Travis and Jenkins) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The idea is that if the
-betterCswitch is thrown, the C standard library assert is used rather than the druntime one, so that (at least for this) druntime is not necessary.