Simply the docs of std.format.unformatValue#5191
Merged
dlang-bot merged 1 commit intodlang:masterfrom Feb 26, 2017
Merged
Conversation
wilzbach
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2017
Contributor
wilzbach
left a comment
wilzbach
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah this makes the docs a lot friendlier to the user :)
Contributor
|
@JackStouffer I assume |
Contributor
Author
|
Eventually |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR brings
unformatValuedocs to the same style as the docs forstd.conv.to. The user doesn't need to know the exact overloads that they can use, it's covered in the docs. And if they get it wrong, the compiler still prints out the overloads ofunformatValueImpl.