Conversation
33fbd12 to
11f196f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Model Fallback Implementation Review
✅ No issues found - This is a well-implemented feature with comprehensive testing and proper safeguards.
What Was Reviewed
This PR adds a robust model fallback system with:
- Retry logic with exponential backoff for retryable errors (5xx, timeouts)
- Immediate fallback switching for non-retryable errors (429, 4xx)
- Cooldown mechanism to stick with successful fallbacks
- Configurable retry counts and cooldown durations
- Comprehensive test coverage (779 lines of tests)
Code Quality Highlights
Strengths:
- ✅ Thread-safe cooldown state management with proper mutex usage
- ✅ Proper resource cleanup (stream.Close() via defer)
- ✅ Comprehensive error classification (retryable vs non-retryable)
- ✅ Context cancellation handling throughout
- ✅ Extensive test coverage including edge cases
- ✅ Well-documented configuration with sensible defaults
Architecture:
- Clean separation of concerns (fallback logic in dedicated file)
- Proper use of Go idioms (defer for cleanup, mutex for thread safety)
- Good error wrapping and logging
Verification Process
I analyzed the implementation for common bug patterns:
- ✅ Resource leaks - None found (proper defer usage)
- ✅ Race conditions - None found (local variables + mutex protection)
- ✅ Bounds checking - Properly validated
- ✅ Nil pointer dereferences - Properly guarded
- ✅ Off-by-one errors - Calculations are correct
Conclusion
This feature adds significant value by making cagent more resilient to provider outages. The implementation is solid with proper safeguards and comprehensive testing.
b4399bc to
4bb5ac8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
I've reviewed the model fallback implementation and found no bugs in the changed code. The implementation demonstrates solid engineering practices:
✅ Proper concurrency control - Mutex protection for cooldown state access
✅ Defensive programming - Nil checks and bounds validation throughout
✅ Error handling - Clear classification of retryable vs non-retryable errors
✅ Context handling - Proper cancellation checks in retry loops
✅ Code organization - Clean separation of concerns between fallback logic and model switching
The feature adds robust failover capabilities with sensible defaults. Good work!
Allows users to define fallback models per agent in the yaml config. If something goes wrong calling a model, retry a few times with exp backoff + jitter or fallback to the next model in the list based on the type of error encountered Signed-off-by: Christopher Petito <chrisjpetito@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Petito <chrisjpetito@gmail.com>
4bb5ac8 to
ee4a7e2
Compare
Allows users to define fallback models per agent in the yaml config.
If something goes wrong calling a model, retry a few times with exp backoff + jitter or fallback to the next model in the list based on the type of error encountered
Makes
cagenta more reliable platform for users, avoiding much pain and frustration and blocking workflows when an inference provider goes downHas sane defaults to keep user configs minimal while still getting big advantages
Covers title generation as well
Minimal example