Conversation
- Inilne text based files instead of using dedicated file api for now - Don't strip placeholders in msg text, they can be useul when referencing multiple files - Fix double @@ when using the file picker for an @ attachment Signed-off-by: Christopher Petito <chrisjpetito@gmail.com>
ec524e9 to
4efe40d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review Summary
I've reviewed the changes for better file attachment handling. The implementation looks solid overall - the shift to inlining text files directly instead of using provider-specific file APIs is a good approach for cross-provider compatibility.
Key Changes Verified
✅ Text files are now inlined with XML-like tags for context
✅ Binary files (images, PDFs) remain as file references
✅ Comprehensive test coverage added
✅ Proper error handling for file operations
✅ Size limits enforced (5MB for inline text files)
Minor Note
There's a theoretical TOCTOU (Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use) race condition where a file could grow between the size check and the actual read operation. However, this has minimal practical impact because:
- The application is a local TUI/CLI tool operating on user-provided files
- Error handling properly catches file access failures
- The exploit window is microseconds and requires filesystem write access
- Size checks prevent most DOS scenarios
The code is well-structured with good error handling and user warnings. Nice work!
Fixes these issues seen in the screenshots below: