golangci-lint: set go version to prevent fallback to go1.17, and fix copyloopvar linting issues #5594
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…opvar)
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
service/logs/parse_logs_test.go:50:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "tc" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
tc := tc
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
…opvar)
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
service/logs/parse_logs_test.go:50:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "tc" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
tc := tc
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
…pvar)
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
service/logs/parse_logs_test.go:50:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "tc" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
tc := tc
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
service/logs/parse_logs_test.go:50:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "tc" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
tc := tc
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
…oopvar)
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
service/logs/parse_logs_test.go:50:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "tc" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
tc := tc
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
…pvar)
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
service/logs/parse_logs_test.go:50:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "tc" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
tc := tc
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
service/logs/parse_logs_test.go:50:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "tc" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
tc := tc
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
service/logs/parse_logs_test.go:50:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "tc" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
tc := tc
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
…var)
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
service/logs/parse_logs_test.go:50:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "tc" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
tc := tc
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
cli/command/image/tree.go:59:4: The copy of the 'for' variable "im" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
im := im
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
…oopvar)
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
cli/command/container/opts.go:765:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "n" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
n := n
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
…var)
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
cli/compose/loader/merge.go:71:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "overrideService" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
overrideService := overrideService
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
…pvar)
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
cli/command/service/update.go:1061:3: The copy of the 'for' variable "entry" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
entry := entry
^
cli/command/service/update.go:1089:4: The copy of the 'for' variable "port" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
port := port
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
…pvar)
go1.22 and up now produce a unique variable in loops, tehrefore no longer
requiring to capture the variable manually;
cli-plugins/manager/cobra.go:55:4: The copy of the 'for' variable "p" can be deleted (Go 1.22+) (copyloopvar)
p := p
^
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
GolangCI-lint attempts to deduct the Go version to lint for through the
go version specified in go.mod, which we don't have, and therefore it
falls back to go1.17 semantics:
level=warning msg="[linters_context] copyloopvar: this linter is disabled because the Go version (1.17) of your project is lower than Go 1.22
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5594 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 59.63% 59.63% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 346 346
Lines 29214 29208 -6
==========================================
- Hits 17421 17417 -4
+ Misses 10824 10822 -2
Partials 969 969 |
vvoland
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2024
Benehiko
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2024
| return | ||
| } | ||
| for _, p := range plugins { | ||
| p := p |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just adding this here for future reference: https://go.dev/ref/spec#For_statements
Go 1.22 fixed iterations to use their own variables instead of sharing them. https://go.dev/ref/spec#Go_1.22
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for linking that! Yes, indeed, they fixed that situation. I know they had some back-and-forth on fixing it, because it could be a breaking change, but ultimately they decided that fixing the "footgun" part outweighed the "breaking change" part.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I realised we were also setting go: build-tags; not exactly sure if those would affect the behavior (i.e., if go would downgrade to go1.21 semantics, and thus disable the new behavior), but just in case it would, I opened a PR to update those;
This was referenced Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
GolangCI-lint attempts to deduct the Go version to lint for through the
go version specified in go.mod, which we don't have, and therefore it
falls back to go1.17 semantics:
- How to verify it
- Description for the changelog
- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)