Using older base container. Reduces dependency on newest version of GCLIB #454
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Cool. Seems to work. Could you:
|
… common version of GLIBC.
Now works out of the box on Debian wheezy, centos:centos6 and other stable
Of course it works on new distributions. Tested with:
debian:jessie and
ubuntu:14.04
Signed-off-by: Alexander Holbreich <alexander@holbreich.org>
Author
|
Done |
Author
|
could you merge it? |
This was referenced Sep 25, 2014
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using older (but stable) distribution reduced dependency on newer (not everwhere awailable) GCLIB version.
So now works on new test distributuon e.g. debian:jessie or ubuntu:14.04 but also on debian:wheezy or centos:centos6.