Reorder installation names#19444
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docsdocker ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
aevesdocker
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Niice, thanks @doringeman. Just some minor quibbles
|
|
||
| Install the `yum-utils` package (which provides the `yum-config-manager` | ||
| utility) and set up the repository. | ||
|
|
||
| ```console | ||
| $ sudo yum install -y yum-utils | ||
| $ sudo yum-config-manager --add-repo {{% param "download-url-base" %}}/docker-ce.repo | ||
| $ sudo dnf config-manager --add-repo {{% param "download-url-base" %}}/docker-ce.repo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This page states that installation is supported on RHEL 7,8, and 9. I think RHEL 7 uses yum, and yum is aliased to dnf in RHEL 8 and 9 for backward compatibility. So would this change break RHEL 7 and is that a concern? @neersighted
Although RHEL 8 and RHEL 9 are based on DNF, they are compatible with YUM used in RHEL 7.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 will reach end of maintenance on June 30, 2024, but it is not reaching End of Life.
https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/linux-platforms/enterprise-linux/rhel-7-end-of-maintenance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, looking forward to RHEL and CentOS 7 reaching EOL, but still a couple of months out. Changing to dnf very likely would break users installing.
Also, I don't think we have packages already for RHEL on architectures other than s390x. I know @neersighted was looking into that, but they're not there yet (?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
RHEL 7 is not supported on x86_64 and aarch64, but RHEL 8 and 9 are. These are both distributions that include DNF.
dvdksn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
for RHEL on Docker Desktop, let's inline the steps to set up the repository for x86/arm in the DD installation guide rather than link out to the s390x guide for docker-ce, to avoid any confusion and/or compatibility concerns
dvdksn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM but should this be called out as an EAP or is it generally available for DD?
|
Merging now. In a follow up PR I'll add the EAP callout and remove the toc entry as per Bruno's request |
No description provided.