replace old versions SDK with latest released /1

[Rick-Anderson]

Fixes #35199

---

Internal previews

📄 File	🔗 Preview link
aspnetcore/data/ef-rp/intro.md	aspnetcore/data/ef-rp/intro

[tdykstra]

Test Sent from iPhone

…

________________________________ From: Rick Anderson ***@***.***> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2025 3:29:10 PM To: dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs ***@***.***> Cc: Tom Dykstra ***@***.***>; Review requested ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs] replace old versions SDK with latest released /1 (PR #35269) @Rick-Anderson<https://github.com/Rick-Anderson> requested your review on: #35269<#35269> replace old versions SDK with latest released /1. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#35269 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAL7GY5ULXYDHZTVIHPRPC322F4DNAVCNFSM6AAAAAB3NXH6BSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJXGMZDKNJXHA4DCNA>. You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[tdykstra]

Correct me if I'm missing something, but I think the options here are to say:

1. Version x is required. (This is what we have currently -- x is the actual version the tutorial was tested with.
2. Version x or later is required. (x is still the actual version the tutorial was tested with but we're not implicitly excluding later versions, as we are in no.1).
3. The latest released version is required. (This is the proposed change in this PR. Can leave people who actually have the correct version for the tutorial thinking they can't use it.)

I prefer no.2 as the most accurate statement of what is required. No.2 could be made more comprehensive by adding "Changes may be required if you use a version later than x."