-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 565
[ci] Upgrade on-prem macOS pool to macOS-14 Sonoma #9477
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
444affd
[ci] Upgrade on-prem macOS pool to macOS-14 Sonoma
pjcollins d193f55
Update arm64 agent demand
pjcollins 2a35c6d
Bump monodroid with cmake update
pjcollins e479dca
Try to run msbuild tests on shared pool
pjcollins 31f23a3
Set os param for 1espt
pjcollins 98411c0
Bump monodroid
pjcollins 88f3bee
Do not run msbuild tests on shared pool
pjcollins 9643443
Update msbuild test agent count
pjcollins afc8417
Revert agent count changes
pjcollins cc7a7f5
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into dev/pjc/pr-arm-sonoma
pjcollins File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume we are intentionally keeping the tests on
x64?Out of curiosity, did you try
arm64? Was there an issue? Were they faster/slower?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm planning to revisit this for the MSBuild and emulator test jobs on both our regular CI and nightly. I don't have the full set of issues I've ran into with different machines in the past but wanted to leave this unchanged for now and look at upgrading most of the test stages separately. The Apple silicon machines definitely seem to be faster, at least for our build stages.